Thread by @VasaviNarayanan

Ji... what u say s right. Sound could be represented in any form. But there are also some sound, which can't be written in any form... Ex : We're writing the sound of OM/AUM like this. But the real one is a pure vibration, which creates to feel such sound.

https://twitter.com/naturaize/status/1313770369644453888

This I will say stubbornly only bcz I experienced it. Our writing of om can't at all come near that.

Next, u know that in the beginning there were only manthras, shlokas and sound vibrations of many types in sanskrit. I told you it is named as Shravya... language of sounds.

It got passed to lakhs of years by teaching only through oral/vocal. There was no scripts. Bcz, some sounds can't be written anyhow...

But Tamizh is named as Dhrushyaa... language of seeing; i.e., which we can speak at the same time learn through writing and seeing that.

This can and will only be developed through written. If not so, then why the previous creations of Tam. even vanishes now? U can u.stand and develop this by reading.

At the same time you can't do this in Sans. It is still remaining only because of the vocal teach & recitation.

In Ramayana period of Threthayug, lord shiva blessed our Agasthyar the Gnyanam to bring Sans. in a writing form. He wrote it by the instruction of lord shiva and then blessed his student Paanini to write the grammar. Of course, by veda puranaas, we can u.stand that the great

Sage Valmiki and Agasthyar were on same period.

I think u know well, there are some letters in Sans. which isn't n Tam. Also in that some are used only in mathraas. So only they told that this should be learnt only through a Guru.

But Tam. is not so. If you learn the basic

letters of Uyir, Mei & Uyirmei... u can learn urself with the support of a grammar book and referring texts. But you can't at all in sans. Bcz it has meanings for a word more than 10 times seen in Tam.

U pls see, scientists they themselves accepted that Sans. is a

scientific lang. which can used for the code method more easily than Eng. But Tam. can't be.

I don't say Tam. is not good... bcz, I myself is a Tam. lover and a poet & writer. At the same time, the detail & reason I would like to explain what the diff. between the both is.

Okay...

If we dig just a small layer of this scientifically, u know well all the sounds from oral/vocal has its own vibration effect in the world. Likewise Tam. also have. But in this, if you examine properly, u can u.stand sans. is having an excellent reach of sound vib.

than Tam. San. mathraas is used to observe the cosmic energy or create the energy to observe the cosmic rays in our physic. The sound vib. is directly connected with cosmic energies in sans.

Paasuraas and poems are also there in Tam. But they are only the outcome of devotion and

love on god. Also they've cured diseases; it was also only bcz of the soul energy and they passed the messaage through Tam. Apart from that, the sound of those words has no super natural effects.

But in Sans. the sound effects of the manthras & shlokas create soul energy,

increases it, makes it to link with the cosmic energy and absorb the energy which we need from there. Also, it teaches to create the vib. energy of om sound without opening our mouth, but through our praana shakthi.

These all are possible only through the San.

So, pls see this post with broad view of fact which we got from our sages instead lang. ego.

Learn San. and practice in proper way, by knowing the science in that. Learn Tam. and love it for the sweetness. But keep in mind the dif. btn Shravya & Dhrushya🙏

🍁Vasavi Narayanan🍁

@naturaize ji
@Malathi95800275 ji
@Santhosh0309M ji
@Bhairavinachiya ji
@iamSri_Sri ji.
@wataboutery ji

@threader_app compile