As @SenFeinstein notes, President Trump has promised to nominate a Supreme Court Justice who would dismantle the Affordable Care Act and health care rights for millions of people across the country.
This is exactly why he nominated Amy Coney Barrett.
The Senate should NOT be prioritizing confirming an anti-health care Supreme Court Justice DURING A GLOBAL PANDEMIC (or ever). It should, if anything, be passing #COVID19 relief.
Thank you @SenatorLeahy for stating what we thought was the obvious.
Imagine being so dead set on getting an anti-health care Justice onto the Supreme Court that you go to her hearing in person without a mask on 10 days after testing positive for #COVID19. 🙃
"Your faith is none of the government's business."
@BenSasse spending a lot of time arguing about courts not being political bodies and religious views not being instilled in law, and yet that's what this nomination would do. 🤔
.@ChrisCoons: "Obergefell v. Hodges, which made marriage equality the law of this land, could be overruled. Just a day after we celebrated #ComingOutDay nationally, stripping #LGBTQ individuals of what Justice Kennedy called 'equal dignity in the eyes of the law.'"
Striking down the ACA would deprive 20 million+ people of health insurance, jeopardize the health of 130 million+ people with preexisting conditions (including millions of #COVID19 survivors), and hinder efforts to end this public health crisis.
"Instead of doing anything to help people who are struggling right now, we are here." —@CoryBooker
The fact that a hearing for an anti-health care nominee is being prioritized DURING A PANDEMIC is a horrific betrayal of the trust we put in our elected officials.
.@CoryBooker: "Nothing about this today is normal. This is not normal. What is going on in America today — in the midst of a deadly pandemic and an ongoing election — having a rushed Supreme Court nomination hearing is not normal."
.@KamalaHarris: "Over 9 million Americans have already voted and millions more will vote while this illegitimate committee process is underway."
Ramming through Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination is indefensible. It jeopardizes the integrity of the Court. #BlockBarrett
"Obergefell v Hodges, which recognized that love is love & marriage equality is the law of the land. The US Supreme Court is often the last refuge for equal justice when our Constitutional rights are being violated."
Just some things Amy Coney Barrett has done/said because she believes in Originalism:
➡️ Refused to acknowledge marriage equality as legal precedent
➡️ Ruled in favor of abortion restrictions
➡️ Noted it would require reversing Brown v. Board
Graham asks Barrett to define her philosophy as an Originalist: “I interpret the Constitution['s ...] text as text, I understand it to have the meaning that it had at the time people ratified it.”
The Constitution's "text" codifies slavery (among other things). 🙃
Judge Barrett joined a letter in 2015 supporting the position that “marriage and family is founded on the indissoluble commitment of a man and a woman” and the “significance of sexual difference and the complementarity of men and women.”
Judge Barrett refused to respond to questions posed regarding whether she believes the Supreme Court's marriage equality decision qualifies as “superprecedent” (aka that no Justice would overrule).
#BREAKING: News outlets are reporting that Donald Trump will nominate Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. If confirmed, Judge Barrett will unleash a Court majority that is hostile to basic civil rights. The impact will be felt for decades. nytimes.com/2020/09/25/us/…
Judge Barrett’s personal belief is that marriage is between a man and a woman, and has been unwilling to affirm that the Supreme Court’s decision making marriage equality the law of the land is settled law.
Her cramped so-called “originalist” view of the Constitution also threatens the civil rights of not just LGBTQ people but a host of others, including women and people of color, who have relied on the courts to make progress in the fight for equality and justice.
HAPPENING NOW: @SharonMcGowanDC is testifying in front of a subcommittee of the US House of Representatives about the Trump administration’s (many) civil rights abuses over the past 3+ years.
Before she joined our team, @SharonMcGowanDC was an attorney in the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice. She left when President Trump nominated Jeff Sessions to lead the department.
.@SharonMcGowanDC: "I have found it exasperating to see how the Civil Rights Division’s scarce and valuable resources have been deployed to undermine rather than advance civil rights."
The military is waging war on servicemembers living with HIV, citing outdated science and fear-based reasoning. But HIV treatment has advanced to where it’s not relevant to whether someone can deploy.
Some background: Since 2018, we've filed three cases against the military on behalf of servicemembers who were denied the opportunity to enlist, deploy, or commission as officers due to their HIV-positive status.
The cases:
Harrison v. Esper: On behalf of Nick Harrison, a sergeant in the D.C. Army National Guard who was denied the opportunity to serve as an officer and a position in the Judge Advocate General (JAG) Corps. lambdalegal.org/in-court/cases…