As we get to the home stretch of #Brexit negotiations, the UK side is questioning whether the FTA deal on offer from the EU is really worth signing.
The complaint: EU isn't giving the same level of market access as other FTAs it's signed, for instance with Canada and Japan.
So what people will be keenly watching from the #EUCO tomorrow is whether EU27 prime ministers and presidents flesh out the meat on the bone in terms of what's actually on offer.
But EU says it's already spelled out what's on offer quite clearly.
The big question: Will Johnson stick to his 15 October deal-or-no-deal deadline?
Probably not, it appears. UK side now saying it will assess whether there's been sufficient progress to continue talks.
But practical reality is a deal needed now to be ratified in time for 31 Dec.
"We need to get substance settled and not having a common text to work from has made progress doubly difficult" a UK spokesperson said today
Says they still don't know exactly what's on offer in terms of EU market access. If this isn't clear by #EUCO's end, Johnson may walk away
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Even countries most exposed to #NoDealBrexit dangers are saying EU shouldn't back down on #Brexit.
Belgium is the 2nd most exposed, but PM @alexanderdecroo says in late-night presser that "it would be crazy not to have a deal but it would be even more crazy to have a bad deal".
De Croo says this resolve is hardening "more and more" on EU side.
"Granting access of the UK to the European market, if you want to that, then we need assurances on the way the UK is going to play the game".
Because trust is low (especially after UK made plans to renege on withdrawal treaty), a sanctions mechanism need to be in place if UK violates FTA.
The UK could “possibly have some predatory behaviour which could be very negative for the European economy"
This morning EU ministers formally adopted an EU-wide colour coding scheme for #COVID19 travel restrictions.
But this EU map has been out there for 2 weeks, and and member states still aren’t using it or coordinating.
Europe’s airlines say this agreement will do little to improve coordination.
They wanted the EU to create windows of certainty for travellers, replace quarantines with testing, allow travel between red zones, and forbid entry bans between EU countries. aci-europe.org/media-room/278…
German Europe minister Michael Roth, asked after today's ministerial why the EU didn't go further to give more certainty to passengers, notes that this is only an EU recommendation because "member states have the powers in this area".
The deal requiring a customs border between Northern Ireland and rest of the UK was not an "unforeseen consequence". It was a consequence foreseen by May, which is why she wouldn't agree to it
The cave-in on this by Johnson was what got him a deal where May didn't
Making Northern Ireland part of the EU's customs zone was the *raison d'etre* of Boris's deal, and the key difference from May's deal.
It was what necessitated an election to get rid of the government's reliance on the DUP, who could never support severing NI from GB.
BREAKING: Now official, Americans remain banned from EU.
By majority vote, EU countries just agreed to allow only these citizens in starting tomorrow: 🇯🇵🇰🇷🇨🇦🇦🇺🇳🇿🇷🇼🇷🇸🇲🇪🇬🇪🇺🇾🇹🇭🇲🇦🇩🇿🇹🇳
Borders in theory open between countries in EU single market (🇪🇺27+🇨🇭🇳🇴🇮🇸🇱🇮🇬🇧)
🇺🇸🇷🇺🇧🇷 banned.
Official adoption will come later today but there's already a qualified majority for this list - nobody can veto.
It will be updated every two weeks. China may be added if it grants reciprocal access to EU citizens.
An important caveat - these are countries that individual EU member states *can* allow in, it doesn't mean they have to. It will be up to each government.
But the fact that this list took so long to agree suggests every country intends to follow it.