Facebook sends its attack dogs against the NYU Ad Observatory for its essential work studying effects of ad targeting on the political process. This is disgusting, especially knowing there are actual data abusers out there actually selling Facebook data to political operatives.
Why isn’t Facebook going after Bridgetree!? They’ve been flagrantly *selling* scraped Facebook profiles for years! Is it because Bridgetree services the GOP and Facebook is afraid to give Joel Kaplan heartburn? Better attack the academics instead. Facebook is a malign force.
Here is head of Bridgetree boasting to Cambridge Analytica of its “very large scraping capabilities” and this a month after Facebook’s Allison Hendrix asked Alexander Nix to delete the Kogan data. So they went shopping for Facebook data elsewhere! But Facebook will do nothing.
Here is Facebook’s Allison Hendrix politely nudging Cambridge Analytica to delete their illicit data *and its derivations*. Would you be so kind to check the backup directory oh sure I’ll just rm -rf that for you — next month they called Bridgetree for fresh Facebook data.
From the now-famed ICO letter (often mistakenly referred to as a final report) which indicates that Cambridge Analytica bungled the data deletion that Facebook politely requested. Then, in 2016 Facebook worked side-by-side with Cambridge Analytica, embedded in the Trump campaign.
Bridgetree boasts about its data scraping on its website. When is Facebook going to sue them out of existence? And get a load of their privacy statement! Bridgetree clients get privacy. The rest of us can fuck right off.
So when Fb says its going after NYU Ad Observatory to protect the privacy of its users, now you know it’s full of shit.
We will stand up to Facebook’s double-standard where data brokers scrape and sell Facebook profiles to the GOP and get away with it while rigorous academics legitimately recruit volunteers to study ad targeting get bullied because they help reveal to the public how Facebook works
It’s a faustian bargain anyway. Facebook is clearly hostile to political advertising research and friendly to political operatives who sell scraped data. Academia should flat-out boycott Facebook funding until they prove otherwise.
I’d wager Bridgetree has supplied scraped Facebook data to the 2020 Trump campaign. My sources tell me Matt Oczkowski and Tom Boschwitz are tight and until last week, Bridgetree was not on anyone’s radar. archive.org/details/ca-doc…
I’d wager Facebook will take no action against Bridgetree. Thiel and/or Kaplan call the shots on this one.
Facebook was cozy with Kogan until bad press. They asked CA to kindly delete. Then they worked side-by-side with CA for Trump in ‘16. Did they help with the *effective* campaign to deter Black voters from participating? Why did Zuck dodge Senator Cantwell? miamiherald.com/news/politics-…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Couched in language to appease skeptics and address controversies around the efficacy of political advertising more broadly, there is some basic evidence here in the C4 leak that is difficult to dismiss as “snake oil” —again, CA/SCL was not *magical* but it was also not nothing.
1. Against better judgement, I tap “Show more replies” 2. Account name has more random digits than the president’s looming debt 3. Scroll thru the sketchy AF TL 4. Gain first hand understanding why the Twitter algo marked this garbage account in the “Show more replies”
We did not have this feature in the lead-up to the last election!
*presidential elections in 2016 which was awash in poisonous digital toxicity with no remediation whatsoever, not the 2018 midterms, but you knew what I was talking about
Enjoy this uncritical and glossy coverage of Matt Oczkowski that doesn’t mention:
–Channel4 News exposé on CA’s voter deterrence
–AP’s alleged illegal campaign coordination story
–Oz & Bossie are in SSCI report
–FOIA redactions indicate FBI investigation politi.co/3jmcpex
Whatever happened to Oczkowski’s Data Propria and why make another company called HuMn Behavior to receive payments from Trump campaign? Clever of him to deny using psychographics for Trump campaign when he did use it for Mercer PACs, NRA, etc. wired.com/story/congress…
Is anyone going to ask Oz for a comment on @Channel4News coverage of the deterrence campaign in a clever weasel worded denial? Or do we just him let him go with the “no comment” strategy and hope for the best? channel4.com/news/revealed-…
One for more time folks! It doesn’t matter if you think Cambridge Analytica wasn’t “effective” but it really does matter if they were an illegal operation. And @CampaignLegal now alleges serious illegal coordination in ‘16 via @garanceburke apnews.com/article/electi…
The new document trove that supports these stunning campaign violation allegations is available here. The Cambridge Analytica saga is not over yet even though so many really wish it would be over. It just isn’t. archive.org/details/ca-doc…
Guardian editorial sharply criticizes those who have almost hysterically downplayed the ICO’s letter about the Cambridge Analytica investigation, distorting the key findings to suit a particular narrative. I will add a detail… theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
The ICO is now re-analyzing the servers after I sent the data given to me on camera by @Channel4News which was much more expansive than what SCL provided and yet matches descriptions of Cambridge Analytica data perfectly, including exact data broker sources and other aspects.
Key reminder by Info Commish: “Cambridge Analytica has since collapsed; if it hadn’t, it would probably have attracted further regulatory action, she added.”
Because SCL committed mass data abuse against all US voters but it escaped liability thru insolvency/bankruptcy!