I'm willing to agree that Twitter is an utterly dishonest company with a clownish Orwellian Truth Ministry that censors information in an obvious attempt to sway the election, if you will agree this is 100% perfectly legal.
I'd have a shit-ton more respect for Jack Dorsey if he just said, yes, Twitter is completely biased against Trump, and will continue to block information, true or not, that would help re-elect him, and the First Amendment means there's not a fucking thing you can do about it
These "but Section 230" replies are something else.
Yes, go ahead and repeal 230, this will totally make it illegal for Twitter to censor your Hunter Biden memes.
Yes, go ahead and repeal 230, this will totally make it illegal for Twitter to censor your Hunter Biden memes.
After that, you can go to the comments section at MegaMAGAPatriot dot com and post some anti-Trump links, and then sue them after they kick you out
Back when I had a blog I solved this conundrum by never having a comments section in the first place
Here's a social media regulation I could live with: an anti-trust rule that limits any single social media property to no more than 1 million accounts. Otherwise they are free to ban/block any information, or people, they wish.
I recommend switching to decaf, Cliff
https://twitter.com/bulldog1875/status/1321513185594220549
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
