Dear @AOC: For someone who prides herself on being able to empathize with the poor & downtrodden, this statement is incredibly tone deaf and tunnel-visioned.

Yes, there are serious flaws w/the #ACA which need to be addressed...but it's a MASSIVE improvement over the pre-ACA era.
To be clear: You voted for #HR1425 this summer (essentially ACA 2.0), for which I applaud you.

But think about what you just said: You think it failed *in general* because it didn't work *for you and your immediate circle of co-workers*.

That doesn't mean it failed for others.
The ACA vastly improved life for tens of millions of people.

It failed to improve life for other people, apparently including yourself. Fair enough. But making a blanket "it failed" statement because you don't feel it helped YOU specifically? Think about that stance a moment.
Did you or any of your co-workers have a pre-existing condition which caused them to be denied coverage or to be charged 10x the average premium to receive it?

Did you or any of your co-workers have their policy *retroactively* terminated the moment they filed a claim?
Perhaps you're thinking of the several million people caught in the Medicaid Gap in states which refused to expand the program. That's not part of the ACA, which required EVERY state to expand Medicaid; that's because of the SCOTUS and a bunch of GOP Governors & legislators.
Perhaps you mean the Public Option not being included. Well, it was...in the House version. Then Ted Kennedy died, Scott Brown won, and the Senate Dems had to scramble to get as much of it through w/out 60 votes as possible. The PO didn't make the cut, which sucks I agree.
The larger problem w/@AOC's mindset is it assumes the #ACA was the end of the road, when it was simply the latest phase in a series of steps. If she was a member of Congress in 1975, would she have said that Medicare (originally for 65+) "failed" because it "failed her"?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Charles Ghoul-ba

Charles Ghoul-ba Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @charles_gaba

31 Oct
Just received the strangest voter intimidation/harassment call I've ever gotten.

Guy from Lakeland, Florida calls me up, starts asking about the election. I assume it's a standard phone banker. I explain I've already voted so he can move on to someone else. 1/
Instead, he starts asking *me* for info about Biden & Harris. He's supposedly "undecided" and wants to know why he should vote for Biden v. Trump.

I ask how he got my number (again, assuming it's part of a phone banking database), he says that my number was "on the internet". 2/
At this point I know for sure something's up. I probe him a bit further--he claims he "just googled it" and my number came up because I'm "the chair of the Democrat Party".

I'm the chair of a *local* Democratic *club* (and even then, my phone number isn't on our website). 3/
Read 10 tweets
30 Oct
📣 OH, YEAH: #ACA Open Enrollment starts Sunday! Here's 7 important things to remember:
acasignups.net/20/10/30/oh-ye…
1. DON'T MISS THE DEADLINE!
In most states you have until 12/15 to #GetCovered, but 9 states + DC have longer deadlines to sign up (though your coverage may start later).
2. MAKE SURE YOU ENROLL IN AN ACTUAL ACA PLAN!
There's lots of scam sites out there, plus sites which are legal but still mix ACA plans with junk plans. Stick to either the official ACA exchange sites *or* to authorized partner sites which *only* sell fully ACA-compliant plans.
Read 11 tweets
29 Oct
📣 UPDATE: @JohnJamesMI *again* tries explaining his position on healthcare policy and it...doesn't go well. Again (see updates at bottom):
acasignups.net/20/10/29/updat…
James seems to have finally realized that "tort reform" has nothing to do with mandating coverage of pre-existing conditions, anyway. He's still touting "selling across state lines", "association plans" and "patient-centered, market-based" solutions, however.
A new bullet is to criticize the fact that several carriers have dropped out of the Michigan #ACA exchange. That's true, but he doesn't mention the REASONS they did so: acasignups.net/17/09/15/michi…
Read 4 tweets
29 Oct
YESTERDAY, the awesome @cynthiaccox posted this thread which explained the tradeoffs involved in healthcare coverage & affordability. 1/
Read her thread, and then read this post of mine from nearly a year ago about the Catch-22 "solution" which the state of Louisiana has come up with as a contingency plan in the event the #ACA is indeed struck down by the Trump/GOP lawsuit: 2/
acasignups.net/19/11/14/louis…
Louisiana has a Democratic Governor but is solidly GOP otherwise...including their Attorney General, @JeffLandry, who's also one of the *plaintiffs* in the #TexasFoldEm lawsuit to strike down the #ACA completely. 3/
Read 17 tweets
29 Oct
Since @ggreenwald is getting some buzz today after resigning from The Intercept, here's the time that he tried to claim that my story about being harassed and attacked by Bernie Bros somehow meant that I was *defending* Bernie Bros:
theintercept.com/2016/01/31/the…
Here's the post that Greenwald was referring to. @paulkrugman referenced it in a piece about the Bros, and I added an update noting that I didn't like the *label* "Bros" simply because it suggested that *all* his supporters were dudes.
acasignups.net/20/10/29/updat…
My objection was purely a semantic one. It had nothing to do with defending the BEHAVIOR of certain die-hard Bernie supporters, which was reprehensible...just the specific label. I would've been fine with "Berniacs" or whatever. Since then, however, I stopped caring about that.
Read 4 tweets
29 Oct
Standing outside the clerks office with a first-time voter! She’s taking advantage of Michigan’s Proposal 3 which allows her to register and vote absentee all at once just 4 days before Election Day! #VOTE Image
Bloomfield Township, MI early vote turnout: Around 22,000 have voted absentee so far out of around 37,000 registered voters. cc: @ElectProject
Correction: 18,000 turned in so far out of 22,000 sent out. Still nearly 50% so far!
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!