We analyzed #COVID19 incidence and mortality data for residents of nearly all of Ontario's 623 nursing homes from March 29-May 20, 2020.
As of March 29th there were 78,607 residents in these homes, with 36.9%, 37.3%, and 25.8% in single, double, and quadruple-bedded rooms.
2/9
As of May 20th, 5218 (6.6%) residents developed #COVID19 infection, and 1452 (1.8%) died of #COVID19 (case fatality rate = 27.8%).
#COVID19 infection was distributed unequally across Ontario's nursing homes, with 4496 infections (86%) occurring in just 63 homes (10%).
3/9
Compared to homes with low crowding, home with high crowding had higher #COVID19 incidence (9.7% vs. 4.5%) and mortality (2.7% vs. 1.3%).
Outbreaks in crowded nursing homes were also larger; there were 9 outbreaks involving more than 100 residents in high crowding homes.
4/9
Regression models also showed that compared to nursing homes with low crowding, those with high crowding had significantly increased risk of #COVID19 incidence and mortality.
Importantly, crowding was not associated with the probability of #COVID19 introduction into a home.
5/9
Simulation analyses suggested that 998 infections (19.1%) and 263 deaths (18.1%) may have been prevented if 4-bed rooms had been converted to 2-bed rooms. In this scenario, an additional 5070 new 2-bed rooms would have been needed to maintain capacity across the province.
6/9
Our results suggest that cohorting as an infection control strategy may be ineffective in crowded homes with many shared rooms.
However, as @jessiecatherine reported in @QPbriefing, Ontario's nursing homes were facing pressure at the onset of the second wave to readmit residents to multi-occupancy rooms to clear "Alternate Level of Care" patients from hospitals waiting for nursing home placement.
8/9
Overall, our findings underscore the urgency of securing temporary locations to decrowd nursing homes (e.g. underoccupied hotels or field hospitals).
In the long-term, crowded homes must be upgraded or rebuilt entirely, to convert all remaining rooms to single occupancy.
9/9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yesterday, despite rising #COVID19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in LTC, Ontario released a framework to "keep the province safe and open": news.ontario.ca/en/release/590…
This is nothing more than an ageist, ableist & unethical "shielding" or "focused protection" strategy.
1/12
A "shielding" or "focused protection" strategy (the latter was popularized by the Great Barrington Declaration: gbdeclaration.org) segments the oldest and most vulnerable to #COVID19, while allowing everyone else to resume life as normal with simple hygiene measures.
2/12
As many have already highlighted, the #Ontario framework establishes a very high threshold for closures and lockdowns: cbc.ca/news/canada/to…
Specifically, the 10% test positivity and incidence rate ≥100/100,000 thresholds for return to a modified stage 2 are very high.
Let's review the escalating #COVID19 catastrophe in the province's care homes.
There are 14 active #LTC home outbreaks and 38 cumulative resident deaths. Today the @redcrosscanada was called into Parkview Place and Maples, the two hardest hit homes: cbc.ca/news/canada/ma…
2/9
Earlier this year, @LTCcovid published international examples of measures to prevent and manage #COVID19 outbreaks in residential care and nursing home settings: ltccovid.org/wp-content/upl…
#Manitoba is failing miserably on almost every key measure.
There remain 22 active Ontario #LTC home outbreaks (see figure).
@ASPphysician has challenged me to say what must be done to get this under control.
Here it is (a thread).
1/8
We need swift action to control community transmission of #COVID19 which is getting out of control.
In our @CMAJ study, the prevalence of #COVID19 in the community surrounding a home was strongly associated with the odds of an outbreak (aOR = 1.91): cmaj.ca/content/192/33…
2/8
Controlling community transmission is imperative, as staff neighborhood characteristics are also significant predictors of outbreaks: medrxiv.org/content/medrxi…
The nonsensical requirement for potential visitors to test negative for #COVID19 within the previous two weeks holds visitors to a higher testing standard than healthcare workers!
As @drlesleybarron writes "I'm a HCW but my first #COVID19 test will be so I can visit my mom"
2/8
The biweekly testing requirement for a weekly visit is ridiculously onerous.
Many visitors will themselves be frail older adults with mobility issues, they're being asked to travel to and from #COVID19 assessment centres, often standing outside in the heat to await testing.
3/8
The approach to "reopening" nursing and retirement homes in Ontario is 1) misinformed, 2) overly restrictive, 3) prone to abuse, 4) not evidence-based, 5) inequitable, and 6) stinks of ageism.
Misinformed: the reopening policies still fail to recognize that many of these so-called "visitors" are family caregivers, essential partners in care who provide hands-on care and support to residents: medium.com/in-this-time-o…
Overly restrictive: for frail older nursing home residents with limited life expectancies, restricting them to one outdoor visit a week by one visitor is not enough: files.ontario.ca/mltc-resuming-…
We are robbing residents and their family and friends of precious limited time.
2/7 The tool determines the max daily number of incident #COVIDー19 cases where the rate of #COVIDー19 patients being admitted to acute care, critical care or requiring mechanical ventilation ("patients in") equals the max daily turnover rate of those resources ("patients out").
3/7 Data from the @CDCgov@CDCMMWR on age-based case distribution and severity (cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/6…) are used to estimate the population-weighted proportion of #COVIDー19 patients requiring acute and critical care resources ("patients in").