There was huge publication and dissemination of Priya Ramani's tweet and the subsequent Vogue article: Luthra #PriyaRamani#MJAkbar#MeToo
Even Ramani realised that what she tweeted tarnished Akbar's reputation, Luthra #PriyaRamani#MJAkbar#MeToo
Her statements were per se defamatory, lowered his reputation, and were disseminated widely. #PriyaRamani#MJAkbar#MeToo
On defences of truth and public interest made by Ramani: The burden of proving these is on the accused, who has not discharged this burden, Luthra #PriyaRamani#MJAkbar#MeToo
Luthra reading out judgments on burden of proof for exceptions in defamation cases #PriyaRamani#MJAkbar#MeToo
Luthra points out that Ramani did not recall whether or not she wrote an article titled 'Sorry Boss, We Found our Voice' in 2013. Questions her selective memory. #PriyaRamani#MJAkbar#MeToo
It is not sufficient for only a part of the libel to be proved to be true. Truth must extend to the entire statement that is published, Luthra says, referring to judgments. #PriyaRamani#MJAkbar#MeToo
Luthra refers to Ramani's Vogue article clearly addressed to 'Dear Male Boss'. She has referred to him as a 'predator' without due care or caution. #PriyaRamani#MJAkbar#MeToo
On defence that parts of article referred to different people: There is no clarification of that, so the statements made are incorrect, Luthra #PriyaRamani#MJAkbar#MeToo
Ramani did something incorrect by deleting her Twitter account, so that no one could understand her statements. Luthra questions credibility of Ramani for making statements without due care and caution. #PriyaRamani#MJAkbar#MeToo
Delhi High Court begins hearing Future Retail's suit against Amazon in relation to the emergency arbitrator award stalling its deal with Reliance Retail.
I want to deal with a point the court discussed before closing the hearing yesterday. What is the cognizablity of the award. They have not challenged the award for whatever reasons : Subrmanium
[VACATION BENCH HEARING: Arnab Goswami vs State of Maharashtra]
Supreme Court bench led by Justice DY Chandrachud to begin hearing appeal against Bombay HC order denying #ArnabGoswami interim bail in 2018 abetment to suicide case at 10.30 am
The plea by Goswami in SC states that his arrest was "illegal, mala-fide and politically motivated as evident from the multifarious proceedings initiated against him, his news channels, @republic and @RepublicBhart
at the behest of the
political dispensation."
Shortly after #ArnabGoswami plea was listed for today, Senior Adv Dushyant Dave raised questions on the selective listing of cases by SC Registry. In a rebuttal of sorts, Goswami's wife, Samyabrata stated why did Dave keep silent during @VinodDua7 & @pbhushan1 urgent hearings
TN Govt informs #MadrasHighCourt that permission to conduct #VelYatra by @BJP4TamilNadu was rejected against citing various reasons including that they have not respected rule of law
HC has granted liberty to challenge the rejection of permission and kept the main matter pending
AG Vijay Narayan submitted that processions were carried out in violation of COVID-19 norms despite a ban on processions. A COVID-19 GO places a ban on processions till Nov 30. He is prepared to argue on the validity of the GO, AG added.