#DelhiHighCourt says that hearing in Mohit Saraf v. Luthra is not possible today because of an administrative meeting.
Asks Senior Advocate Parag Tripathi (for Saraf) if he can argue tomorrow. Tripathi asks if it can be taken up on Thursday.
Adv Raghvendra Singh asks if written submissions can be filed by both sides so that time taken to make submissions can be cut down.
Court: If time limit is fixed, and supplemented by written submissions, should be no problem.
Senior Adv NK Kaul (for Luthra): We, Mr Singhvi and I, will take some time, because the nature of prayers being asked for will have a deep impact.
Tripathi: Written submissions on both sides will only shorten the hearing.
Court suggests that written submissions can be submitted in addition to oral arguments: Whatever time Tripathi has taken, you (lawyers for Luthra) can take that time...
Tripathi submits (without interim relief): Every day I am suffering.
Court says it will hear the matter on Thursday.
Justice Kameswar Rao: We will have it on Thursday. We'll work it out
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Delhi High Court begins hearing Future Retail's suit against Amazon in relation to the emergency arbitrator award stalling its deal with Reliance Retail.
I want to deal with a point the court discussed before closing the hearing yesterday. What is the cognizablity of the award. They have not challenged the award for whatever reasons : Subrmanium
[VACATION BENCH HEARING: Arnab Goswami vs State of Maharashtra]
Supreme Court bench led by Justice DY Chandrachud to begin hearing appeal against Bombay HC order denying #ArnabGoswami interim bail in 2018 abetment to suicide case at 10.30 am
The plea by Goswami in SC states that his arrest was "illegal, mala-fide and politically motivated as evident from the multifarious proceedings initiated against him, his news channels, @republic and @RepublicBhart
at the behest of the
political dispensation."
Shortly after #ArnabGoswami plea was listed for today, Senior Adv Dushyant Dave raised questions on the selective listing of cases by SC Registry. In a rebuttal of sorts, Goswami's wife, Samyabrata stated why did Dave keep silent during @VinodDua7 & @pbhushan1 urgent hearings
TN Govt informs #MadrasHighCourt that permission to conduct #VelYatra by @BJP4TamilNadu was rejected against citing various reasons including that they have not respected rule of law
HC has granted liberty to challenge the rejection of permission and kept the main matter pending
AG Vijay Narayan submitted that processions were carried out in violation of COVID-19 norms despite a ban on processions. A COVID-19 GO places a ban on processions till Nov 30. He is prepared to argue on the validity of the GO, AG added.