The lawyers on behalf of accused defended the remand order passed by the Magitrate at Alibaug.
Ponda further requested that the verdict on the revision application and bail application may be given together.
#AlibaugSessionsCourt will decide on the request after the revision application subissions are over.
Lawyer for Feroze Shaikh submits that the request of the informant (wife of Anvay Naik) to re-open investigation is unfair.
Lawyer submits that whatever information could be submitted during the previous investigation, has been submitted already.
In support of the submission lawyer stated that the wife of the victim did not take any action against alleged omission of the police to conduct investigation properly for so long and has approached the authorities only now.
Lawyer for Feroze Shaikh, Adv. Neha Raut concluded her arguments by stating that the police has been given right to interrogate the accused everyday, which essentially serves their purpose of investigation.
Raut also requested the Court to hear the bail application at the earliest as Shaikh had not filed for interim bail before the High Court.
He added that the remand order was passed with proper application of mind.
"It is evident as the order was passed at 11.30 after thorough hearing." He contended.
Aggarwal concluded his submissions vehemently opposing the revision application.
Spcl. PP P. Gharat begins his submissions in support of the revision application staating that the application was challening the correctness and propriety of the order.
Gharat added that the arrest was required as there was a suicide note recovered.
He stated that of the arrest was not required then the Magistrate would not have granted permission to interrogate in judicial custody.
Gharat: why is police chstody required then, arrest and put in judicial custody straightaway.
Gharat: Suicide is not offence but abetment is. And the accused bave been charged with driving a person to commit suicide.
Gharat: There is specific mention in his note, that these three are cause of finishing my life.
Gharat refers to the High Ciurt to point out the observations of the court.
Lawyer for Nitesh Sarda intervenes that the HC specifically clarifies that the Sessions Court should not be influenced by observations of the High Court.
Gharat: Assuming the contention of accused that Naik murdered his motheris correct, it is important to note that Anvay Naik must be under such stress that he was compelled to kill her and then himself.
Gharat: some police custody is necessary, considering the support to the accused from the political party and considering his influence.
Magistrate was duty bound to grant police custody and not get swayed away.
Adv. K. Kadam appearing with Vijay Aggarwal interjects Gharat's submissions that he is not arguing on law and going into facts. That he is deliverately also delaying the bail hearing.
Sessions judge directs him to stick to arguments on law.
Gharat refers to the High Court's order of yesterday rejecting the interim bail to point out how the court had recorded that the victim's family was not aware of the investigation till May 2020 this year.
Gharat concludes his arguments requesting the Sessions Court to set aside the remand order given on "flimsy" grounds and to grant police custody.
Aggarwal gives a rejoinder to Gharat's submissions
States that he (Sarda) is kot politically connected.
Accused lawyers state that if the interrogation has not yet begun deapite custody then the permission was sought only for the purpose of submitting that as an argument.
Delhi High Court begins hearing Future Retail's suit against Amazon in relation to the emergency arbitrator award stalling its deal with Reliance Retail.
I want to deal with a point the court discussed before closing the hearing yesterday. What is the cognizablity of the award. They have not challenged the award for whatever reasons : Subrmanium
[VACATION BENCH HEARING: Arnab Goswami vs State of Maharashtra]
Supreme Court bench led by Justice DY Chandrachud to begin hearing appeal against Bombay HC order denying #ArnabGoswami interim bail in 2018 abetment to suicide case at 10.30 am
The plea by Goswami in SC states that his arrest was "illegal, mala-fide and politically motivated as evident from the multifarious proceedings initiated against him, his news channels, @republic and @RepublicBhart
at the behest of the
political dispensation."
Shortly after #ArnabGoswami plea was listed for today, Senior Adv Dushyant Dave raised questions on the selective listing of cases by SC Registry. In a rebuttal of sorts, Goswami's wife, Samyabrata stated why did Dave keep silent during @VinodDua7 & @pbhushan1 urgent hearings
TN Govt informs #MadrasHighCourt that permission to conduct #VelYatra by @BJP4TamilNadu was rejected against citing various reasons including that they have not respected rule of law
HC has granted liberty to challenge the rejection of permission and kept the main matter pending
AG Vijay Narayan submitted that processions were carried out in violation of COVID-19 norms despite a ban on processions. A COVID-19 GO places a ban on processions till Nov 30. He is prepared to argue on the validity of the GO, AG added.