"The specificity of the test was recorded as 99.68% - the overall false positive rate was 0.32%, although this was lowered to 0.06% in a lab setting."
"It has an overall sensitivity of 76.8% for all PCR positive individuals but detects over 95% of individuals with high viral loads, and minimal difference between the ability of the test to pick up viral antigens in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals."
These LFD tests are not as good at picking up cases as PCR tests.
In the case of the Innova results, it would pick up around 76.8% of those that would test positive using PCR tests (the ones we have been using)
These were the papers considered by SAGE on mass testing
Consensus statement prepared by the Multidisciplinary Task and Finish Group on Mass Testing (TFMS) for the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE).
Here is my thread showing my new heatmaps for detected cases, positivity, hospital and ICU admissions.
We have reached the grim milestone of over 200 cases per 100,000 in the over-80s. There were 8 cases per 100,000 in this age group in August.
Not all cases are detected.
Monochrome version
Positivity of tests for males in Pillar 2. Positivity is the number of people testing positive divided by the number of people tested. Greater than 5% means that not enough testing is being done.
This does not appear to be due to cases being disproportionately added in Liverpool due to Lateral Flow Device testing - ( table below based on that from )
* This does not appear to be due to cases being disproportionately added in Liverpool due to Lateral Flow Device testing - ( table below based on that from @avds )
Guidance for universities / students for returning home:
- what lateral flow device (LFD) tests are being used
- what is the sensitivity of these tests
- how is the risk of testing negative being communicated
- what are the results of the Liverpool pilot
The guidance discussed the high specificity of the tests but is silent on the sensitivity.
The guidance says
"This will provide additional assurances that where tests are negative, there is a reduced risk in students travelling home, and a reduced risk of transmission to their family and home community."
But this does *not* mean you will not be infectious.
The updated SPI-M slides - a short thread on what's changed.
On 31 September, in a hastily arranged press conference, the Chief Scientific Adviser presented these two slides, showing projections for hospital admissions and deaths.
These were subsequently revised
The first slide shows a *projection* for hopsital admissions. On the left, the oringial slide, on the right, the amended slide.
These slides present a *range* of the projection (the shaded blue area), and a central projection (the dark blue line).
The upper level for the range of the projection has changed but *the central projection* (the dark blue line) *has not changed*