#FunFact: I've been an expert witness in 2 civil cases. The second time, I was originally supposed to testify the 1st day fo the trial but kept being rescheduled; I finally testified on the 5th day...but I had to sit in the courtroom for ~8 hours each day...at $150/hour.
The case involved both sides being clueless in different ways. A web developer working as a "volunteer deputy" at the Macomb County Sheriff's Dept. developed & maintained an elaborate website for them for free for 3 yrs...then demanded to be paid for his work, including back pay.
The plaintiff (the web developer) claimed that he was owed $300,000. He & his expert witnesses went on & on about how incredibly impressive/sophisticated the code was; all the nifty database tools he had implemented; etc etc.
I explained in my testimony that NONE OF THAT WAS REMOTELY RELEVANT...because not only was there no contract, the plaintiff had openly admitted that he had never asked for a dime for working on the site for the first 3 years.
If you offer to paint my ceiling for free, and I say "um...sure", it doesn't matter if you're the greatest painter in the world and you make my ceiling look like the Sistine Chapel...if I never agreed to pay you anything, either in writing or even verbally, I don't owe you squat.
HOWEVER...the Macomb County Sheriff's Dept. also screwed up by tacitly accepting the plaintiff's *unofficial* website as their *official* website, to the point of slapping the domain name on their squad cars, business cards, pamphlets, etc etc.
The domain name THEY DIDN'T OWN.
That's right: They never bothered to secure the domain itself *or* the hosting of the site, which meant he tried to blackmail them into paying up.
Which led to them bursting into his apartment & impounding his computer equpiment.
It got kind of weird after that.
Here's an article about the case from the first day of testimony...
In the end, the Macomb County Sheriff's Dept. got their domain & website back under their ownership; the web developer didn't get a dime; and I got paid upwards of $10K (expert witnesses also get paid for their time explaining details to the lawyers to help prep the case).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's how "Healthy Michigan" (#ACA expansion) enrollment has grown since it was launched in April 2014. It ramped up & hovered between 650K - 700K until February 2020...after which enrollment has taken off again.
That's a 23% increase since February. If the #ACA is struck down by the Trump/GOP lawsuit, *830,000 Michiganders* would be screwed.
#HR584, introduced by @RepTerriSewell & @RepVeasey last year, is very simple but would have a huge impact. Right now, if Georgia decided to expand Medicaid under the #ACA, they would have to pay 10% of the cost out of the gate. 2/
In Georgia, expanding Medicaid via the #ACA would provide healthcare coverage to up to 474,000 Georgians. Assuming $6,000/yr apiece total, Georgia would have to contribute $280 million/year.
Under #HR584, Georgia wouldn't pay anything for the first 3 years. 3/
📣 OK, I delayed doing this long enough; as promised, I've finally started running my full analysis of the ~$5.9 million* I raised for Democratic candidates throughout the 2019-2020 Election Cycle.
*(still raising $ for the GA Senate runoffs)
First up: The U.S. Senate:
The grey rows are Dem Senate candidates who either dropped out or lost in the primary. A total of $36,824.95 was donated to these candidates. I debated how to categorize Adrian Perkins/Antoine Pierce since neither one was technically the Democratic nominee--there WAS none in LA.
The orange rows are for Undecided (Ossoff / Warnock / 3rd Party Orgs for the Georgia Senate Runoffs). I've raised a total of $628,784.57 for these two races combined so far; I could see hitting perhaps $700K total by Jan. 5th.
This is something I've caught some heat from other healthcare advocates over.
I *hate* #ShortAssPlans & would prefer to ban them...but only *after* we #KillTheCliff & beef up the APTC formula. Until then they're a necessary evil, though they should be strongly discouraged.
ACA plans are affordable for those earning up to 200% FPL & for most earning 200-400% FPL, but are unaffordable for many earning >400% FPL due to the subsidy cut-off.
#ShortAssPlans suck, but until the 400% cut-off is removed, they're a kinda/sorta viable option for those folks.
The ACTUAL solution is to #KillTheCliff, which @HouseDemocrats did in July & which is a core provision of #BidenCare...@dylanlscott's point is that if killing the 400% cut-off isn't doable, #ShortAssPlans may continue to be a necessary evil for some people.
To be honest, w/a 50/50 Senate & the filibuster staying in place, even if weakened (most likely), the more likely bet would be to pass the Incentivizing Medicaid Expansion Act: acasignups.net/19/01/16/reps-…
#HR584 (the Incentivizing Medicaid Expansion Act of 2019) would extend the 3-year 100% FMAP rate for #ACA Medicaid expansion so that *any* state which expands the program gets 100% federal funding for the first 3 years regardless of when they implement it.
Under the ACA, the feds covered 100% of the cost for 3 yrs, but *only* if the state implemented expansion starting in 2014. If Georgia did so today, they'd have to pay 10% of the cost right out of the gate. This bill would take away the only legit excuse not to do so.