Antarctic waters are protected by stringent regulations, including a ban on heavy oil fuel (HFO) adopted in 2011, even though no cargo moves through the turbulent southern waters. For the Arctic, the rules have been looser. reuters.com/article/shippi…
In a virtual session of its Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) the UN’s International Maritime Organization (IMO) approved a ban on the use of HFO and its carriage for use by ships in Arctic waters after July 1, 2024. reuters.com/article/shippi…
The Clean Arctic Alliance coalition described the regulations as “outrageous” as it included exemptions and waivers, which would mean a complete HFO ban would only come into effect in mid-2029. reuters.com/article/shippi…
“In its current form, the ban will achieve only a minimal reduction in HFO use and carriage by ships in the Arctic in mid-2024,” said @Sian_Prior9 Prior, lead advisor to the @CleanArctic Alliance. reuters.com/article/shippi…
.@IMOHQ said there would be exemption for ships with oil fuel tanks located inside double hull. There would also be provision allowing countries with coastlines bordering #Arctic waters to issue waivers to ships flying their flag while they operate there til July 1, 2029.
The #Arctic has warmed at least twice as quickly as the rest of the world over the last three decades and shipping traffic has expanded. The Arctic has warmed at least twice as quickly as the rest of the world over the last three decades and shipping traffic has expanded.
Environmentalists @CleanArctic say HFO produces higher emissions of harmful pollutants, including sulphur oxide, nitrogen oxides & black carbon. In addition, a possible oil spill involving HFO from a ship could have devastating impact on #Arctic ecosystem. reuters.com/article/shippi…
The next MEPC session, scheduled for June 2021, is expected to formally adopt the measures. reuters.com/article/shippi…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On Friday, "an IMO sub-committee approved proposed Arctic heavy fuel oil ban. Environmental advocates & indigenous peoples’ groups criticized the ban as insufficient & called on Arctic states to pass stronger regulation on their own. " @malte_humpert@IMOHQ@ArcticCouncil#mepc75
The @IMOHQ regulation, however, has repeatedly been criticized by environmental organizations @CleanArctic as too weak due to a number of loopholes, which will allow #Arctic states to continue using HFO until mid-2029.
The @ImohW decision has been condemned by environmentalists as a "massive missed opportunity".
Heavy fuel oil (HFO) is widely used to power commercial ships. HFO's have been banned in Antarctic waters since 2011 over fears that oil spills could cause pollution.
Dr @Sian_Prior9 , from @CleanArctic Alliance, said @IMOHQ & its member states "must take collective responsibility for failing to put in place true protection of
Arctic, indigenous communities & wildlife from threat of heavy fuel oil". bbc.com/news/science-e…@BBCScienceNews
"Ships will be banned from burning or using heavy fuel oil (HFO) in Arctic waters under a newly agreed regulation, but with loopholes giving most polluters a pass until 2029." climatechangenews.com/2020/11/20/un-…
#Breaking: @IMOHQ & Arctic States Slammed for Endorsing Continued Arctic Pollution by approving "outrageous" weak heavy fuel oil ban bit.ly/38ZP40s#mepc75
.@CleanArctic slammed the decision by @IMOHQ to approve a ban ridden with of loopholes on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic (HFO), saying that it would leave the Arctic, its Indigenous communities and its wildlife facing risk of a HFO spill for another decade
The ban was approved during a virtual meeting of the @iMo’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (#MEPC 75), despite widespread opposition from Indigenous groups, NGOs and in a statement release this week, the Catholic Church. bit.ly/38ZP40s