The @ImohW decision has been condemned by environmentalists as a "massive missed opportunity".
Heavy fuel oil (HFO) is widely used to power commercial ships. HFO's have been banned in Antarctic waters since 2011 over fears that oil spills could cause pollution.
Dr @Sian_Prior9 , from @CleanArctic Alliance, said @IMOHQ & its member states "must take collective responsibility for failing to put in place true protection of
Arctic, indigenous communities & wildlife from threat of heavy fuel oil". bbc.com/news/science-e…@BBCScienceNews
And John Maggs, senior policy advisor at @SeasAtRisk: "A 'ban' that affects just a quarter of ships is not a ban at all." A coalition of green groups [US!] had proposed a much tougher set of restrictions but they were rejected by @IMOHQ delegates. bbc.com/news/science-e…
HFO produces emissions of harmful pollutants, including sulphur oxide, nitrogen oxides, and black carbon. Furthermore, an accident which resulted in an HFO spill from a ship could wreak havoc on the Arctic's fragile ecosystem. bbc.com/news/science-e…@BBCScienceNews@IMOHQ
The new restrictions, which will come into force in July 2024, aim to reduce the number of ships that can use and transport HFO in the Arctic. bbc.com/news/science-e…@BBCScienceNews@IMOHQ
But included are a whole string of exclusions and waivers for ships that carry the flag of the five central Arctic coastal countries (Russia, Norway, Denmark (Greenland), Canada and the US) until July 2029. bbc.com/news/science-e…
Earlier this month, Norway announced its own proposed HFO ban from all the waters around the Arctic island archipelago of Svalbard. bbc.com/news/science-e…@BBCScienceNews@IMOHQ
"The Arctic environment is threatened from all sides, from climate change, toxic contamination, plastic pollution, oil exploration and other extractive industries. What the Arctic needs now is better protection and bold politicians." bbc.com/news/science-e…@BBCScienceNews@IMOHQ
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On Friday, "an IMO sub-committee approved proposed Arctic heavy fuel oil ban. Environmental advocates & indigenous peoples’ groups criticized the ban as insufficient & called on Arctic states to pass stronger regulation on their own. " @malte_humpert@IMOHQ@ArcticCouncil#mepc75
The @IMOHQ regulation, however, has repeatedly been criticized by environmental organizations @CleanArctic as too weak due to a number of loopholes, which will allow #Arctic states to continue using HFO until mid-2029.
Antarctic waters are protected by stringent regulations, including a ban on heavy oil fuel (HFO) adopted in 2011, even though no cargo moves through the turbulent southern waters. For the Arctic, the rules have been looser. reuters.com/article/shippi…
In a virtual session of its Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) the UN’s International Maritime Organization (IMO) approved a ban on the use of HFO and its carriage for use by ships in Arctic waters after July 1, 2024. reuters.com/article/shippi…
"Ships will be banned from burning or using heavy fuel oil (HFO) in Arctic waters under a newly agreed regulation, but with loopholes giving most polluters a pass until 2029." climatechangenews.com/2020/11/20/un-…
#Breaking: @IMOHQ & Arctic States Slammed for Endorsing Continued Arctic Pollution by approving "outrageous" weak heavy fuel oil ban bit.ly/38ZP40s#mepc75
.@CleanArctic slammed the decision by @IMOHQ to approve a ban ridden with of loopholes on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic (HFO), saying that it would leave the Arctic, its Indigenous communities and its wildlife facing risk of a HFO spill for another decade
The ban was approved during a virtual meeting of the @iMo’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (#MEPC 75), despite widespread opposition from Indigenous groups, NGOs and in a statement release this week, the Catholic Church. bit.ly/38ZP40s