Senior Advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul appears for @whitehatjunior .
Adv Yadunath Bhargava for @malpani: We received the plaint last night.
Kaul: There is complete disparaging tweeting and reporting on our business model.
Court : Don't you think it's happening everywhere.
Kaul : The kind of debate on Times now.. I can't hear it .. the nature of debate has now become street like.
Disparagement has become a business model : Kaul
It should be discouraged. What is the law : Court
No one is denying free speech. Problem is when you cross the laxman rekha of fair criticism: Kaul
There is a difference between what is of interest to public and in public interest: Kaul
This is an angel investors investing in rival business model which is into animation, website development: Kaul
He is talking about false advertising. We are dealing with a person whose license was suspended by Maharashtra Medical Council for false advertisement: Kaul
You are not making a fair comment from arm's length. You can't use the kind of words that you are using: Kaul
There is something which is per se defamatory. Then there is libel .. there are cases of parties who don't have skin in the game and make comments from arm's length: Kaul
In the third case also, the person has to show bona fide: Kaul
They may say that the kind of companies they're investing in are more hardware link things.. how do you stop the twitter rampage (after filing of suit ): Kaul
You call the person a liar, a cheater.. pig : Kaul
The examples are endless but I'll stick to 6-7: Kaul
Kaul shows comments on "Deconstructing #WhiteHatJr .. strategy to cheat parents", refrence to WhiteHat Jr as a pig, a racket
Everything ends with a racket : Kaul
They associate me with a man who is involved in an education scam : Kaul
Kaul shows more screenshots of the comments made by @malpani.
You say we are shameless and stealing when we have a business arrangement : Kaul
Kaul reads comment on #WhiteHatJr teachers being zero skilled.
Now he's criticising us for coming to court also.. : Kaul
Please have the next page where we are shown as Ravaan : Kaul
Court is informed that Ram in the picture was the defendant from yesterday ie Pradeep Poonia.
Fair criticism is the heart and soul of the democratic society .. does free speech support disparagement? .. is this free speech that the framers of the constitution envisaged ? : Kaul
Some form of injunction will have to be granted : Kaul
These are different rival models. The target and end game is the same. Your endeavour is you bring down a business model: Kaul
This person can't tell tell what bad or good advertising is. Can this person be permitted to malign a rival business model : Kaul
Even if he was not investing in rival business model, can any journalist, NGO, paper use the kind of language.. I may have a different opinion. I haven't seen anyone use words like pigs, liars in the name of fair criticism: Kaul
Per se defamation of this nature is something where nothing more needs to be shown : Kaul
Even where you come and say this was bona fide, still the person is required to take sufficient care to test its veracity: Kaul
Reputation is a protected right : Kaul
It is part of Art 21, right to privacy.. every case will turn of its own facts. It is not fair criticism. You are doing a great disservice to the cause of fair speech : Kaul
May I cite some judgements: Kaul
You are on Puttaswamy : Court
Yes: Kaul
Kaul lists more judgements.
There has to be some basis to what you are saying.. these are people with global reputation. There are academic, debatable issues- whether kids should spend so much time before computer.. I can understand fair criticism: Kaul
Kaul presses for interim injunction.
Majumdar seeks to show the tweets by @malpani last night.
There is some sanctity to court proceedings: Adv Rajashekar Rao.
Rao shows the tweets made by @malpani on yesterday's order in Poonia's case.
Attempt is being made to show we are in contempt but we are not: Bhargava
One doesn't know the order: Bhargava
What are you saying. It was in open court. You can find the order verbatim in tweets: Court
There is an earlier tying up. You don't find everyone's legal fee right.. but this is not going to affect your order. As judges, we know how to filter : Court
The court did dictate the order. It was reported in media.. : Rao
This tweet is against you.. He wants parity in amount of he is being sued for : Court
Prima facie, there was material to say that some tweets were to be take down : Rao
Conscious of the fact that his matter is tomorrow, he encourages all to retweet the tweets.. Mr Malpani has to be restrained completely. This conduct is malafide : Rao
Rao shows the tweets that were made in the last couple of nights by @malpani and Poonia.
I don't force or bully parents (unlike what is claimed) : Rao
He is soliciting support after there is an injunction by the court: Rao
Rao reads Poonia's reaction to the HC's order.
Rao reads more tweets.
There is pre filing conduct.. still creates a group, roast #whiteHatJrScam . Then once you are already before court, you must hold back and say whatever you have to say (before court) : Rao
Bhargava asserts that @malpani's educational credentials.
How does it matter? The most illiterate person can be the most well mannered: Court
I deal with everybody.. for me everyone is the same : Court
Allegation was made that his license is suspended: Bhargava
That's not the scope of the suit : Court
Everything goes back to fact that he is malicious because he is an investor: Bhargava
But is he an investor or not in edu start ups. Yes or no: Court
Non competitors, he has some relationship but I don't know. I'll have to take instructions. He is not an investor in competitive start ups : Bhargava
But it may be planning to enter the domain : Court
Please tell me your statement and I'll record: Court
He usually invests in healthcare start ups. He has invested in education start ups : Bhargava
We intend to make an application .. plaintiffs are resident in Mumbai. Defendant is in Mumbai. It is affirmed in Mumbai : Bhargava
The suit is for defamation and trademark infringement: Bhargava
Bhargava asserts that the Delhi High Court doens't have the territorial jurisdiction to hear the same.
Defamation law is wherever defamation happens, suit can be filed : Court
Bhargava says there is a judgement by Justice C Hari Shankar.
Judgement deals with social media defamation and where the suit can be filed against it.
When plaintiff and defendant reside in Mumbai and the suit can be filed in Mumbai, the suit is filed in Delhi. Same applies to trademark act. It cannot be Delhi HC: Bhargava
I agree that free speech has to be upheld which is being muzzled. Every tweet has to be sene in context: Bhargava
12 billion dollar start is on one hand and an IIT grad on the other: Bhargava claims that people wanted to start a public funding to support the litigation against Poonia.
Is something that is posted online always true?, Court asks
You yourself don't know if it is right or wrong: Court
It's happening day in and day out.. I'm responsible for myself and not third party : Court
What is being sold by #WhiteHatJr is that if you enroll, you will become Elon Musk. But they had to take it down. Same thing happened with Wolf Gupta: Bhargava
They are selling it to middle class people.. I'm a middle class person : Bhargava
You need someone who is very well at doing so .. that's where teachers come in .. we have something to show that they have a one mon teacher interview: Bhargava
Are you saying that someone's capability can't be judged in minute? Who are you to judge: Court
In a min the court can judge if an injunction has to be granted in a case : Court
On social media, people are encouraged to speak unsubstantiated.. you retweet it thinking it is a gospel truth: Court
This is twitter.. that is how twitter functions. One has to examine and if it is wrong. Social media allows crowd sourcing of information: Bhargava
Here is a 12 billion dollor start up saying I will not take dissent: Bhargava
He's saying I'm open to fair criticism but you can't call people cheats, pigs.. : Court
I cannot get out of the fact that he is right when he's retweeting posts of a person he doesn't know.. and still stake claim that I'm right : Court
I don't have Twitter account, Facebook.. Ny social media account. I don't watch TV: Court
That's a matter of trial.. or time might show that I was right : Bhargava
Alright I've to form a prima facie view here : Court
Kaul refutes the claim that Delhi HC doesn't have jurisdiction.
Kaul cites judgements to show that Delhi High Court does have jurisdiction.
Court starts dictating the order.
Court allows #WhiteHatJr to place evidence in a CD/pendrive.
Court issues summons to @malpani in the suit and the application.
Written statement be filed within 30 days.
Court says that the suit be listed on the same day as Poonia.
Court records some of the tweets made by @malpani in the order.
Considering that some of the averments in the plaint are denied by @malpani and that as per him, the suit is not maintainable, defendant having not caused any harm, for which the defendant has to file his affidavit..: Court
A limited ad interim injunction is to be passed .. Malpani is restrained from making any comment against #WhiteHatJr which is defamatory in nature: Court
Court also directs that Malpani take down certain defamatory tweets as noted on the order.
These tweets pertain to calling #WhiteHatJr a "racket", pig and accusing it of being shameless and stealing from code .org etc.
I don't see any material to show trademark infringement .. unlike the previous case (against Poonia) who was using WhiteHatSnr : Court
Court takes note of more tweets to add to the order.
I will just ask you to take down. I'm not here to teach you what is defamation of suit : Court
Kaul presses for inclusion of a tweet on " bullying parents".
Let us see.. if we still insists and tomorrow he's not able to prove it, he will pay you compensation. This is not the end. Some facts need an affidavit: Court
We've been calling him Mr Bhargava. He's actually Mr Bhargavan : Rao
Hearing adjourned.
Delhi High Court restrains Aniruddha Malpani from making defamatory comments against WhiteHat Jr
Karnataka High Court begins hearing a batch of petitions challenging the induction of three MLCs into council of ministers. These MLCs are R. Shankar, A.H. Vishwanath, and N. Nagaraj (MTB)
Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appears in plea filed by Adv Harisha AS.
Bhushan submits that one of the respondents should not be inducted to council of ministers and another respondent should not be allowed to continue as an MLC.
Inaugural Session of the Global Virtual Conference on "Reimagining & Transforming the Future of Law Schools & Legal Education”, by Jindal Global Law School of OP Jindal Global University commences
Founding Vice-Chancellor, Prof. (Dr.) C. Raj Kumar commences welcome address.
He thanks RS Prasad and Cyril Shroff, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas for gracing the event.
The event can be watched live here:
Union Law Minister RS Prasad commences his address.
Prasad: I am very sorry I am not able to participate in this interaction... because of a cabinet meeting which is going to take place around the same time which I am obliged to attend.
Supreme Court to hear appeal by Andhra Pradesh govt assailing the gag order passed by the Andhra Pradesh HC in relation to an FIR registered against a former Advocate General & probe into the #AmravatiLandScamCase
High Court had stayed the investigation in relation to the Amravati land scam case, in which the FIR registered by the State’s Anti Corruption Bureau named daughters of a sitting Supreme Court judge.
The Jagan Mohan Reddy government has mounted a challenge against this order, primarily stating that the order came to be passed in relation to an FIR which itself was not questioned. @ysjagan @YSRCParty #amravatilandscam
It proposes that religious conversion by force, or by giving inducement or by facilitating conversion through marriages, should be included in the category of crime. @myogiadityanath
Under this law, religious conversion is allowed, but conversion by force or through any kind of inducement is not.
If a person wants to perform marriage after converting into any other religion, they will need to take permission from District Magistrate 2 months before marriage
The ordinance provides for a jail term of 1-5 years with Rs 15,000 penalty for forceful religious conversion.
For conversions of minors and women of SC/ST community, there will be jail term of 3-10 years with Rs 25,000 penalty. .#UttarPradesh
Court: There was an application moved by Sharjeel, what has happened to his belongings?
Jail Superintendent: As per the statement of officers, he has not handed over anything. Only Rs 1000 was recovered which has been deposited with the Govt treasury