Supreme Court Backs Religious Challenge to NY Virus Shutdown Order buff.ly/3m8fRvt
Gorsuch: "there is no world in which the Constitution tolerates color-coded executive edicts that reopen liquor stores & bike shops but shutter churches, synagogues and mosques,”
"The constitutionality of the bans turns on the science of how the pathogen spreads & the best available scientific evidence supports the mass gathering bans."
In addition, people in stores generally try to minimize their interactions as much as possible, a feat made easier by the ability to constantly move around.
In contrast, the point of in-person religious services is to commune with one’s fellow worshippers.
Even when social distancing, congregants are still often in a crowded room, perhaps with questionable ventilation, filled with people all around them.
Moreover, the fellow worshippers surrounding them are speaking and even singing for an extended period of time.
You don't have to take my word for it that shopping at a store and attending a worship service are NOT AT ALL the same in terms of risk.
The school of public health at John Hopkins rated the contact intensity of shopping as low that of places of worship as high.
As most people realize, #SCOTUS declared that the right to abortion was a fundamental right in Roe v. Wade, and that any infringement was subject to strict scrutiny. Just about any restriction in the first trimester (when most abortions occur) would be unconstitutional.
What many do not realize is that the Supreme Court dialed back the level of protection in Casey. Abortion was still a constitutional right, but it became a lot easier to regulate. As long as a law did not impose an “undue burden” on women seeking an abortion, it was fine.
Here's the problem: 12 out of 13 participating private schools were religious schools, and the Montana Constitution bans the State of Montana from funding, either directly or indirectly, any religious schools.