🚨PREPRINT🚨 How many and who are willing to receive an approved COVID-19 vaccine? Our findings (psyarxiv.com/8kn5f) raise concerns: Willingness is (1) below needed levels; (2) driven by mistrust, which hinders effective health communication; & (3) may weaken. Thread 👇[1/7]
Method: We rely on quota-sampled survey data from 8 Western countries: Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Sweden, Italy, the UK & the US (total N = 9,889). Data was collected in the weeks prior to recent vaccine announcements and is funded by @Carlsbergfondet. [2/7]
Estimates are that 82% vaccinated are needed to reach herd immunity. In none of the observed countries do we reach this level in planned willingness. There is high intra- and international variation, with willingness in some countries as low as ~40%. [3/7]
Our full model model to explain individual variation (pooled across countries) is here. Vaccine hesistancy reflect (1) lack of concern for the self and ... [4/7]
...(2) a web of anti-systemic beliefs organized around mistrust of health authorities but also involving concerns about rights, lack of compliance and outright conspiracy beliefs. Interestingly, pandemic fatigue also makes you *less* willing to accept vaccines. [5/7]
These factors, especially trust in health authorities, also explain the cross-national variation, suggesting that some countries face severe problems in mobilizing their publics in favor of a COVID-19 vaccine. [6/7]
The findings are a 3-fold cause of concern: (1) Vaccine acceptance is low; (2) the role of mistrust blocks effective communication: if you don't trust the source, you won't trust the message; and (3) some factors (e.g., fatigue) will worsen before the vaccine is here. [7/7]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Vi står i den alvorligste situation ift. #covid19dk siden foråret. Borgernes adfærd afgør smittekurven, og adfærden hviler på tiltagenes legitimitet, som er under pres. Og smittesæsonen er kun lige startet. En tråd om udfordringerne, faren og løsningerne. [1/14]
@regeringDK bør indføre *legitimitet* som eksplicit pejlemærke under #covid19 udover smitte og økonomi. Dermed sikres en bedre smitteforebyggelse & relationen mellem borger og stat efter krisen. En tråd om hvorfor og hvordan. [1/11]
En grundlæggende præmis er, at adfærden er afgørende for smitteudviklingen. Og befolkningen er handleparate. Når smitten stiger (rød kurve) skærpes opmærksomheden på afstand (grøn kurve) - også inden restriktionerne indtræder (stiplede linjer). [3/11]
🚨New in @PsychScience 🚨How to encourage distancing and mask use? We show that induction of empathy towards vulnerable groups is effective: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09…. Due to the skewed risk-profile of #covid19, empathy may be a behavioral key to hinder infection spread. [1/6]
First, we demonstrate that observed empathy for vulnerable groups predict adherence to physical distancing across countries (the US, the UK and Germany). [2/6]
Second, we show that materials that induce empathy towards vulnerable groups increase motivation to adhere to physical distancing. Non-emotional information was not itself enough to increase this motivation, only when coupled with the empathy induction. [3/6]
Problemstillingen: En frygt i både DK (nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2020-0…) og udlandet (bmj.com/content/370/bm…) er, at mundbind medfører "falsk tryghed", og at folk derfor slækker på andre råd. Hvad viser de danske data? [2/9]
Metode: HOPE-projektet (hope-project.dk) indsamler dagligt 500 repræsentative interviews. Siden 20. juli har vi spurgt til mundbind. Vi spørger også om en række psykologisk og adfærdsmæssige forhold. Derudover undersøger vi effekten af de nye anbefalinger og påbud. [3/9]
Smittetallene stiger og nye restriktioner sættes igang.
Hvad ved vi om danskernes adfærd under coronakrisen; hvad lærte vi under første nedlukning; og hvad er implikationerne for regeringens håndtering, så vi undgår en ny nedlukning? [1/16]
Danskernes bekymring steg henover sommeren, og er på et af de højeste niveauer i mange måneder. Bekymring steg før udmeldinger om nye tiltag. Det viser, at danskerne tager situationen alvorligt. [2/16]
Danskernes opmærksomhed på sundhedsrådene har været konstant henover sommeren. Alligevel steg kontakten til andre i samme periode. Det tyder på, at adfærden kan skride, selvom man gerne vil holde fast, og selvom man er bekymret. [3/16]
For me, the basis for science & democracy is Popper's doctrine of "critical rationalism". Twitter is not a place of reflection, yet reflection is important these days. So, forgive me for this thread on whether the elements of this doctrine is today under strain - or not. [1/9]
"Critical rationalism" is critical because it accepts that the belief in rationalism cannot itself be proven. It is rationalism because it contains a commitment to reason, i.e., "I may be wrong and you may be right, and, by an effort, we may get nearer to the truth" [2/9]
The commitment to reason entails the belief that I and, especially, you are rational. This includes, in part, that arguments are produced not as a means of self-expression but to convey information and that arguments are evaluated independently of the person. [3/9]