On safety:
“no new serious safety concerns have been identified”
most common adverse reactions:
injection site pain
fatigue
myalgia
arthralgia
headache
redness at injection site
Usual caveats of “vaccine data by press release Mondays” apply:
This is a company press release, not scientific paper
There is a lot of additional data I want to see to understand how robust results are
We don’t know how long immunity lasts
and whether vaccine stops transmission
And of course:
We need to produce billions of doses
And then we need to actually vaccinate people
And it is not just going to be about how fast we produce vaccine and vaccinate people, but also in what order we vaccinate people, both nationally and globally.
But - and I’ve said this before - if this data pans out this is an unprecedented achievement:
Highly efficacious vaccines will start being rolled out to fight a virus that was discovered THAT SAME YEAR.
Here we go. Moderna and Biontech/Pfizer have today submitted the data on their #covid19 vaccines to the EMA to request a conditional market authorisation. EMA spokesperson told me they think a decision could come “by the end of this year at the earliest”.
If data submitted on Biontech vaccine is robust enough, “EMA’s scientific committee for human medicines (CHMP) will conclude its assessment during an extraordinary meeting scheduled for 29 December at the latest”
If data on Moderna vaccine is robust “EMA’s scientific committee for human medicines (CHMP) will conclude its assessment during an extraordinary meeting scheduled for 12 January at the latest”.
“Last week saw the first decline in newly-reported #covid19 cases globally since September, due to a decrease in cases in Europe”, says @DrTedros at @WHO presser. Says it’s "thanks to the effectiveness of difficult but necessary measures put in place in recent weeks”.
@DrTedros@WHO#covid19 cases are still increasing inmost other regions, says @DrTedros and warns that gains can easily be lost, especially with the holiday season coming up. "This is no time for complacency."
@DrTedros@WHO "We all need to consider whose life we might be gambling with in the decisions we make”, says @DrTedros. “We all want to be together with the people we love during festive periods. But being with family and friends is not worth putting them or yourself at risk."
Interesting piece by @mattapuzzo and others at @nytimes looking at the list of seven demands Trump conveyed to @WHO before he announced withdrawal. No clear strategy apparent. “It was all about my country, my politics, my election”, says @LawrenceGostin. nytimes.com/2020/11/27/wor…
“The third item asked Dr. Tedros to say that countries were right to consider travel restrictions during the pandemic ... Dr. Tedros was wary of being drawn into the American presidential campaign, where travel restrictions were a rallying cry for the Trump campaign.”
“The American requests also called for the W.H.O. to pre-qualify coronavirus drugs and vaccines for use around the world once they were authorized by major regulators in the United States, Canada, Europe or Japan.”
“#Covid19 is an uneven pandemic”, says @DrTedros at @WHO press conference on #sarscov2. “70% of cases and deaths are in just four countries.”
(Number seems wrong to me, though general point is true of course. Will check.)
@DrTedros@WHO So, according to @WHO’s own numbers US, India, Brazil and Russia account for about 30 million cases, pretty exactly half the global total of now more than 60 million cases.
On deaths: about 660,000 are US, Brazil, India and Mexico, less than half the 1,4 million global deaths.
@DrTedros@WHO Many countries have shown #covid19 can be controlled with existing tools, says @DrTedros. "One of the things all these countries have in common is an emphasis on testing."
This (German) article by @hfeldwisch raises important questions about the Gangelt publication by @hendrikstreeck et al, that I've been wondering about. It argues that the study underestimates how deadly #sarscov2 is because not all the deaths were counted. medwatch.de/2020/11/26/die…
1. We know that deaths lag cases and studies like this Princess Diamond one (eurosurveillance.org/content/10.280…) take that into account when calculating IFR 2. @hfeldwisch and others had warned before that the Gangelt study was not doing that
This new paper on #sarscov2 transmission delves into the data from Hunan province and it is really interesting and the kind of data I would love to see more of. So a short thread science.sciencemag.org/content/early/…
The authors used a dataset of 1,178 infected individuals and their 15,648 close contacts identified in Hunan province between January 16 and April 3 and reconstructed most likely transmission chains.
Superspreading:
The paper confirms previous work showing high overdispersion (so small minority of people leading to most onward transmission): “We find that 80% of secondary infections can be traced back to 15% of #SARSCoV2 infected individuals”.
Estimate k at 0.3