Analysis of how margin of error could have affected all 16 VAR offside decisions in the Prem.
- 5 of 14 disallowed count
- Of the 5, 3 are Liverpool
- Three could have changed result (2 Liverpool)
- Only goal allowed would be ruled out on "Umpire's Call"
A thread.
To start with, if you missed it, here's yesterday's thread explaining how the Eredivisie uses margin of error on VAR offside.
We need a thread about West Ham v Aston Villa and offside.
The Dutch "margin of error" is suddenly getting traction in the UK media. Which of course you'd have known about two months ago if you followed the Monday VAR thread.
This ain't a silver bullet, but it would be better.
There are a couple important things to debunk.
- "Thicker lines" is misleading
- Players will still be offside by an inch
Which feeds into this discussion between @GNev2 and @Carra23 on MNF, specifically to Gary Neville's point.
Here's your Monday VAR thread. Not too long this week because there's not much to talk about, and one incident is related to a few others. So it's just:
- Why Mo Salah could only be given offside
- Brighton's penalty vs. Liverpool
If there's any others unrelated, do ask.
Let's preface this by saying we all hate the marginal offside decisions. There are clear issues with overall accuracy due to a number of factors.
But FIFA says this is the system we must use. So I'm setting out how it's used.
The Mo Salah offside caused a lot of misplaced anger. The whole debate is getting a little tiresome. We have been with Hawkeye offside for almost 16 months now, we know what to expect.
Offsides like Patrick Bamford deserve anger, but this was a standard marginal offside.
Just in from the crucial IFAB meeting to decide any clarifications in the 2021-22 laws.
In relation to the handball Law, given that the interpretation of handball incidents has not always been consistent, further clarification is supported.
Notwithstanding the revised 2019-20 wording, it was re-emphasised that the final judgment remains with the referee and not every touch of a player’s hand/arm with the ball is an offence.
For the definition of “unnaturally bigger”, referees should judge the position of the arm in relation to the player’s movement.
While the handball law is not going to be rewritten, it should now be tidied up and clarified from the mess it is in the written laws.
It's the Monday VAR thread. A busy one today for some reason.... including:
- Bamford offside
- Handball!
- Barkley offside
Starting with the worst of the weekend, the Patrick Bamford disallowed goal for Leeds at Palace.
There's no point going over the general flaws again, you can read about that in detail in the attached thread, but I'll cover the specifics of this decision.
First a reminder that you can now play the ball with the top of your arm after the law changed in the summer. It's why Mane was offside against Everton too.
And you can score with it; Gabriel already has for Arsenal against Fulham.