I am going to rant about taxes for a bit because that 2018 FOX interview with Cori Bush has me pissed, at her for not doing her homework and at FOX, Mitt Romney, and all the other tax propagandists who focus solely on federal taxes. Remember Romney's 47% who pay no taxes? A lie.
But it's a lie that goes over well as it comforts and flatters the wealthy by portraying them as the people grossly bearing the burden of paying for everything while 47% are freeloaders. Well, first off, everybody pays into Social Security and Medicare, even the undocumented.
and they will never receive those benefits they pay for. There is a small exception for those who work but earn so little all their taxes are refunded as an Earned Income Tax Credit. They way Republicans scream about EITC you would never know it was originally a GOP plan (Nixon)
But the big lie is how states and local governments tax people. In 45 of the 50 states, poor people pay more of their income in taxes than the wealthy. In some states as much as six times more, so let's look at those states.
Here, by the way is the average state and local effective tax rate for the US as a whole.
Here are the states ranked from the worst to the best. Please note that oh-so-progressive Washington state is the worst state in the entire country. They have no income tax and rely heavily on sales taxes
Here is #Washington - what a mess.
The busboy pays 17.8% and Bill Gates pays 3%
Such progressive values.
Here is #Texas but don't you really expect Texas to have a horseshit government with a horseshit tax system?
And #Florida, another state with awful government that no one expects to be anything other than bottom of the swamp. I mean, they elected Rick Scott AFTER he defrauded Medicare.
And #SouthDakota is almost as bad a shit sandwich on taxes as it is on COVID
Then #Nevada isn't far behind in the coddle the billionaires game
#Tennessee another not the least bit surprising entry in the stick it to the poor states
#Pennsylvania disappoints me, but it's not the first time.
#Illinois has no excuse for being one of the 10 worst states. None.
#Wyoming brings up the rear, the 10th of 10 shitty states who tax the poor significantly more than they tax the rich or the middle class.
But here's the kicker - almost every state does!
Even #Oregon where there is no sales tax at all and is just shy of being in the top 10 for best tax systems taxes the poor more than any other quintile. 41 and still taxing the poor more.
#Maryland is the first state that does not tax the poor more than everybody else. More than the rich, yes. But less than the middle class. 42 on the list
and at 43 #Montana - dang the poor pay more again, but overall, more equal but not at all progressive.
44 #NewYork The poor pay a higher effective rate than the richest 1% but the middle that gets the bite.
45 #Maine is getting close to flat, but again, the lowest effective rate is that top 1%
46 #NewJersey is the first that has a fairly progressive effective tax rate overall but the highest taxed are the middle class
47 #Minnesota is the first state taxing the top 1% the highest rate and it's 47 out of 51.
48 #Deleware - the corporate haven but look at their taxes. The first truly progressive (a very thin margin) but it actually goes up each step of the way.
49 is #Vermont Do you notice how when it's progressive, it's still close to flat but in the terrible ten, it's not even close to flat.
50 is #DistrictofColumbia which is the only reason Oregon is not one of the ten best.
51 and the unequal tax system is #California though the poor pay more than the middle class, but at least there is a real bump for the top 1%
If your state was in the middle 31 - you can find it here. @ITEPtweets releases this report every year and has for as long as I can remember. My org often relied on ITEP when fighting attempts to reduce Oregon's income tax by adding a sales tax. itep.org/whopays/
And while we're at it, let's dispense with the "You can't tax the rich enough to fix budget shortfalls, there are not that many of them." George Will said that once on some show and I found myself nodding my head and my Mom snapped, it's not a head tax, it's an income tax
And remember that. It's not how many wealthy there are, it's how much do they make and how much wealth do they have.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nearly every day, I realize how lucky I was to have my parents. Poor, yes, but I never had a moment of doubt in their love for me or each other. My dad wad the soft thwarted one but my mom was so wise. Here's an example:
Out of nowhere one day, Hildie, A family friend, opined on interracial marriage, saying she's no racist and has no objection, but think of the kids...how racists will make their lives difficult. I am sure everyone has heard a version of this.
So, my mom said, of course, you're not racist, but if two people are in love and want to marry, what's the difference to them between you opposing their marriage because of other people's racism and the people who oppose their marriage because of racism?
When I was a canvasser, I would employ different strategies in different neighborhoods. For example, in Weiser, Idaho, I wanted to avoid wasting time with conservatives who opposed health care reform, so I said we're working for single-payer national health care like Canada has.
That meant they would slam to the door in my face and I could move on. With folks who seemed more likely to support, I would use less polarizing language in order to have the conversation. We're working to make health care accessible and affordable for all.
But this is the kind of retail, one-on-one conversation that allows for judgment calls and persuasion. It's not mass marketing. In mass-market messaging, you do not want to polarize, because that means you lose the chance of persuasion.
I decided not to retweet the "radical feminist" indulging in transphobic mourning the loss of lesbians and deleted the tweets. Here is my perspective. No ideology that oppresses and limits a person from expressing their gender honestly is radical nor is it liberating.
My nephew's child was born a woman. Right now, their public face is female and lesbian, but that is not who they are. Sadly, their parents are transphobic. They can accept a lesbian daughter, not a trans man. This is sad.
However, my nephew and wife could open their fucking eyes. They don't, to their discredit. When I asked this young one what pronoun they would prefer, they cried.
"That's the first time anyone asked me. If feels like no one can see me."
Ted Hawkins is one of my favorite singers. Sadly, he died before most of his recordings were published. He had more success in Europe and in the US supported himself busking. The explanation is he was "difficult" but what does that mean in racist America?
He didn't want to change his song arrangements to something more commercial, is that difficult or integrity? What does difficult mean in white supremacy?
Whatever, don't let racist erasure win, listen to Ted Hawkins.
Think of The Lost Ones" which was too real for America
Mama is dyin' and Daddy is gone
I'd call the doctor but there's no telephone
Sister is cryin' and the medicine is gone
We are the lost ones livin' all alone
One difference between the class-reductionist progressive & the human-rights-centered liberal is the former believe a policy that benefits everyone lifts all boats while the latter recognizes that people drown whether they are 3 inches or 10 feet underwater.
This has led me to think about what policies a truly anti-racist agenda would promote. Yes, of course, there are the obvious ones such as reparations, police accountability, etc., but let's dig deeper. Take healthcare. M4All won't cure racism, what will address it, though?
The FDA could require that research trials include diverse populations so we don't learn 10 years down the road that a drug that helps white men actually harms Black or Asian men. Ditto, include women since drugs also work differently for them. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…