Tweet

Ticker

12 Dec, 9 tweets, 2 min read

Indians say plebiscite in Kashmir couldn't be held due to non-withdrawal of Pak Army. UN Resolution of 13 Aug 48 says Pak start withdrawal process Ist & while its army WAS BEING WITHDRAWN, bulk of Indian Army was to start withdrawal. India refused to share withdrawal plan with UN

While Pakistan shared its Army's withdrawal plan with UN Mission, it were the Indians who refused to share their withdrawal plan with UN. It clearly meant, they had no intention of withdrawing their forces from Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir. Indian farce is exposed.

UNSC 1952 Kashmir Resolution No 98 stated that at the end of period of demilitarization, 3000-6000 forces could stay on Pakistan side of cease-fire line & 12000-18000 forces could stay on Indian side. India never withdrew majority of its army, forcing Pak Army to pend withdrawal.

It is very clear that it were the Indians who deliberately did not withdraw their army from Kashmir & created a hurdle in UN sponsored plebiscite. It was never due to non-withdrawal of Pakistan Army, who were ready to withdraw, if Indians would also withdraw as per UN resolution.

"Towards the end of 1948, it became clear to me then that we would never get the conditions which were necessary for a plebiscite [in Kashmir], so I ruled out the plebiscite for all practical purposes."

Selected Works of Jawaharlal Nehru: volume 19, page 323

“It just does not matter what your Constitution says; if the people of Kashmir do not want it, it will not go there. If the plebiscite went against India, we would accept the verdict and we would change our Constitution about it”.

Nehru's speech in the Lok Sabha on June 26, 1952

Early 1954, Nehru met Pakistani Prime Minister & in a joint statement agreed to announce date of plebiscite in Kashmir before Apr 1954. Nehru later refused citing US-Pak agreement saying that it has disturbed the regional balance of power & plebiscite in Kashmir cannot be held.

In the 1901 Census of the British Indian Empire, the population of princely state of Jammu and Kashmir was 2,905,578. Of these:

2,154,695 (74.16%) were Muslims
689,073 (23.72%) Hindus
25,828 (0.89%) Sikhs
35,047 (1.21%) Buddhists
0.032% Others

Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir is a United Nation Security Council designated disputed territory which is acknowledged internationally, and is not part of Republic of India.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @hannan021

Ticker

@hannan021

11 Dec

Invasion of Kashmir by Indian Sikh Jathas & Hindus began in Jul 1947 in Jammu region, much before Pathan tribesmen entered Kashmir to protect Muslims. It happend after Jammu massacre by Indian Sikhs & Hindus till Oct 1947, killing well over 250,000 & ethnic cleansing of Muslims.

Indian Sikh Plan for invasion of Jammu & Kashmir was conceived in 1945. Its outlines started emerging in early 1947. Indian Sikh Jathas & Hindus invaded Jammu first, killing over 250,000 Muslims & ethnically cleansed over 500,000 into Pakistan to change Jammu region's demography.

Sikh jathas were “working under some centralised control” said British commander of Boundary Force in 1947. Surrounding Muslim villages, waves of Sikhs hurled grenades, set fire to houses & swordsmen hacked down those trying to flee. Over 120 Muslim villages in Jammu were burnt.

Read 15 tweets

Ticker

@hannan021

10 Dec

Around 6000 years ago, an enhanced socio-cultural interaction between various regions of urbanised phase of Indus Valley of Pakistan commenced. Gradually, a geographically unified entity was transforming into a socio-cultural & civilisational unitary order, called Pakistan.

Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC) did not consist of City States like Mesopotamia. More similarities than differences attribute to IVC like governance, weight measurements, size of bricks, similar pottery/terracotta, city grids, construction standards, trade practices & a lot more.

The precursor of Indus Valley Civilisation of Pakistan has been acknowledged to be 7000 BC Mehrgarh in Balochistan, Pakistan. It was excavated by a French team of archaeologists in 1974 and scientifically proven to be a 7000 BC (9000 years old) archaeological site.

Read 11 tweets

Ticker

@hannan021

30 Jun

Pakistan is Land of Indus. Also called Abaseen, Father of Rivers. In Rig Veda, written in Pakistan (1500 BC), Indus has been identified as the only male river in area. Tributaries of Indus have been identified as female rivers.

Pakistan thus, is the Fatherland & not Motherland.

In Tibet Indus is called as god river & in Pashto, Father of Rivers. Rig Veda applies feminine gender to all rivers, except Sindhu with a masculine gender. Sindhu is seen as a strong warrior amongst other rivers seen as goddesses & compared to cows & mares yielding milk & butter.

"Pakistan, the Indus land, is the child of the Indus in the same way as Egypt is the gift of Nile. The Indus has provided unity, fertility, communication, direction and the entire landscape to the country".

Professor Dr. Ahmad Hasan Dani

Read 11 tweets

Ticker

@hannan021

13 Jun

Many people in Pakistan believe that Raja Porus who fought the Battle of Hydaspes (326 BCE) against Alexander of Macedon was a Hindu. Raja Porus was not a Hindu but a Buddhist and this has been confirmed by many well known Numismatic scholars.

Indian religious scripture Satapatha Brahmana (500BC) calls Puru tribe Rakshasas & Asuras (Demons). Also used for Buddhists. Hindus say Porus (fought Alexander of Macedon) was a Puru & thus Hindu. Can Asura or Rakshasas be Hindus. Porus was Buddhist. Numismatics confirm this fact

As stated in the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Volume 6, the coins of Porus' era prove unmistakably that he was a Buddhist and not a Hindu as is famously believed.

Read 13 tweets

Ticker

@hannan021

8 Jun

There were two theatres of 71 war, western theatre & eastern theatre. Though Pakistanis fought bravely, they lost battle of eastern theatre. Indians did not succeed in western theatre. Pakistan did not lose 1971 war; it retained its original territory, sovereignty & independence.

1940 Pakistan Resolution at Lahore, stated formation of soverign state(s) from contiguous Muslim majority areas. Only Punjab, Afghania (KP), Kashmir, Sindh = PAKISTAN, were contiguous Muslim majority areas. Bengal was not contiguous to Pakistan and as such its B was not added.

Bengali Muslim leaders struggled for an independent Bengal. When they felt that they could not gain independence, they requested Mr Jinnah to become part of Pakistan movement & in 1946 Delhi Resolution was passed in which East Bengal was added.

Read 13 tweets

Ticker

@hannan021

14 May

In her book "In Freedom's Shade", Anis Kidwai clearly states that Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel was directly involved in and encouraged the massacre of Muslims in 1947, including the Muslim villages around Delhi. She also says that Mahatama Gandhi was in knowledge of this fact.

Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel - The monster and a mass murderer from Republic of India, who ordered and followed up the mass murders of over two million Muslims and ethnic cleansing of tens of millions of Muslims in 1947. He was responsible for committing crimes against humanity.

During 1947 planned ethnic cleansing & massacre of Muslims in east Punjab, Maharajas of Patiala, Alwar, Dholpur, Faridkot, Bikaner & Bharatpur supplied arms, ammunition & explosives to Sikh & Hindu Jathas. Over 2 million Muslims massacred & over 10 million ethnically cleansed.

Read 15 tweets

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!