Bar & Bench Profile picture
14 Dec, 109 tweets, 12 min read
Hearing in MJ Akbar's criminal defamation case against Priya Ramani to begin before Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Ravindra K Pandey.

After the transfer of Judge Vishal Pahuja, parties are making arguments afresh.

#MeToo #PriyaRamani #MJAkbar #Metooindia

@mjakbar
Senior Advocate Rebecca John for Priya Ramani begins.
John sums up the submissions made by her in the previous hearings.
It is my truth, made in public interest and good faith: John

#PriyaRamani
Third limb of section 499 IPC is reputation. Their case is based on reputation. That his reputation was impeccable and it was harmed because of my disclosure: John
I will quickly read that they have said: John as she asks the court to see the complaint made by @mjakbar against Priya Ramani.
John refers to the notice framed against Ramani in the case.
Notice is predicated on the fact that I harmed the reputation of MJ Akbar: John
John reads Akbar's testimony on his reputation being harmed.
They use the word per se. I will argue on this as well. There is nothing like per se defamation: John
I put several things to him during his cross examination to prove that his reputation was not stellar: John

I confronted him with the FirstPost article on several women making sexual harassment allegations against him. I put the article written by Pallavi Gogoi as well : John
John now comes to the testimony of Joyeeta Basu, Akbar's witness.
John reads her statement.
John reads her cross examination.
What is the credibility of this witness who was ready to be a witness for Akbar even before legal action was taken. She said that she read the allegations by other women as well but only found Priya Ramani's allegation defamatory: John
John reads the statement by witness Sunil Gujral.
John reads his cross examination.
This man is a friend. The families know each other. He extended a loan to @mjakbar. It is strange that when so many women made allegations against Akbar, he only saw Ramani's tweets. What is his credibility?: John
John reads the testimony of Veenu Sandal.
John reads her cross examination.
John highlights that Sandal writes on the paranormal.
As far as she is concerned, my comments will be reserved when I read Ghazala Wahab's painful testimony. She selectively decided that it was only Ramani's tweet that harmed Akbar's reputation: John
John reads Tapan Chaki's statement.

He was the punisher of Asian Age: John
Publisher*
John reads his cross examination.
He says he only read Ramani's tweet but was told about the allegations by others: John
It is my duty to show that this reputation was not that reputation. I showed the allegations made by 15 women. I showed Pallavi Gogoi's allegation. They accepted that Akbar was in a consensual relationship with a junior : John
The witnesses have either not read other tweets or have only found Ramani's defamatory. Reputation is a fact in issue : John
John reads the Indian Evidence Act on "fact in issue".
I have every right to contest the so called impeccable reputation of Akbar. There can't be no objection to me producing evidence to the contrary.he himself filed a document to show that many women made allegations against him: John
I sought to establish a pattern of behavior: John

John reads section 14 Evidence Act.

#MJAkbar
Something which has happened consistently is pattern of behavior.. which is a fact in issue is relevant. I have every right to contest it: John
John urges the court to read a judgement from her compilation.
John reads the judgement.
John continues to read the judgment.
What the Bombay High Court said that when you challenge the reputation, it is a fact in issue : John
Questions on credibility of the complainant are allowed: John
John reads another judgement.
The reason that I went through sections 7,9 and 14 and these judgements is because I want to contest Akbar's reputation. my questions are relevant: John
I am answering a charge of impeccable reputation. I have tried to puncture the case of impeccable reputation at multiple levels: John
They have opened the door to impeccable reputation. Let me in this background read the evidence of Ms Ghazala Wahab: John
John reads Wahab's testimony.
John reads Wahab's professional credentials.
John reads Wahab's statement on her job at Asian Age.
..for the first time I was reporting to Mr Akbar.. he could watch me at my desk.. when he was alone, he left the door open: John

John reads Wahab's statement on intranet messages sent by Akbar to her on her clothes.
When I went inside and asked me to close the door.. Mr Akbar came up behind me and held me by my waist.. he ran his hands from my breasts to my hips: John continues to read.
The enormity of this violation overwhelmed me completely: John continues to read.
My colleague who had seen me run out followed me to the parking.. I told her everything. She suggested that I speak with Seema Mustafa: John reads.
I narrated the incident.. I was hoping that Seema would offer to speak with Mr Akbar. Seema said that she was not surprised. I was alone, confused and petrified. Asian Age had no anti- sexual harassment mechanism: John
In 1997, the workplace was very different from how they are now : John continues to read.
Is there any specific mechanism for the field of journalism? : Court

It came only after the 2013 Act. Vishakha guidelines were thete but Act came only after Nirbhaya. Compliance came only after 2015-16: John
Section 357A IPC also came in 2013. That's why Ghazala is saying so: John

John continues to read Wahab's statement.
Having realised that I was on my own.. I sent a message to Akbar that his unwelcome sexual advances were unacceptable. Akbar asked me to come inside and he lectured me on how I was humiliating him: John reads.
Meanwhile, Akbar's behaviour did not change.. I would stand on the doorway. Sometimes he would put is hands on mine or tried to kiss me: John continues to read.
My colleague would follow me on some pretext or the other : John reads
I had shared my ordeal with two more colleagues. Mr Akbar's personal secretary also came to know. Later Ms Veenu Sandal was sent to speak with me. She told me Akbar was in love with me. I was disgusted: John reads
Akbar told me that I was to shift to Ahmedabad and that Mr Akbar would stay with me whenever he came there.. I gave my resignation..: John reads.
I reached home and told my family that I was taking a break. I didn't tell them that I was sexually harassed because that would have been the end of my career: John continues to read.
Over the years, some women had shared their experience of sexual harassment at the hands of Mr Akbar : John reads.

On 6/10/2017, Ghazala says on oath that she tweeted about MJ Akbar. Ramani was mot the first one to tweet : John

#MeToo
6/10/2018*
On 9/10/2018, my friends and colleagues from Asian Age messaged me if I was not going to tell my Akbar story : John reads
I was not looking at seeking legal remedies against Akbar. I felt #MeToo gave a platform to women to unburden themselves: John
John reads that the Wahab wrote an article on her experience for The Wire which was published on 10/10/2018.
I wrote an article refuting Mr Akbar's rebuttal of my story: John reads Wahab's statement.
I've demonstrated that when they say he is a man with impeccable reputation, I have every right to rebut it. I'm establishing a pattern of behavior. Ms Wahab's statement is not hearsay. She tells us her story. It is direct evidence: John
These objections have to be dismissed. Ghazala's evidence is central to the case : John
Court takes a break for five minutes.
Hearing resumes.
John states that Wahab's tweet was before the tweets made my Ramani.
Johns reads the responses to Wahab's tweet.
John refers to Wahab's WhatsApp exchange with Meenakshi Kumar, a colleague at Asian Age in relation to the incident.

On Oct 9, 2018, there was no complaint. Women are coming forward to tell their story. Meenakshi is asking Wahab if she would tell her Akbar story : John
On 10/10/2018, she chooses to write. What she said before court on oath is what is written in the article. Complaint is of Oct 15, 2018: John
A very very serious allegation but Akbar chooses not to prosecute her : John
John shows that several people expressed solidarity with Wahab after the article.
John refers to the messages sent to Wahab from women in the industry after the article.
John points out a WhatsApp message from Rachna Grover saying that she was aware of Ghazala incident.

In pre summoning evidence, Mr Akbar had listed Rachna Grover as his witness. After summoning, her name was dropped after seeing that we would attack her credibility : John
After coming back from Africa, Akbar had issued a press note attacking the women who made allegations against him. Ghazala replied to the release: John
In response to Akbar's refutation, Ghazala wrote on 15/10/2018: John
Ghazala has exhibited the messages sent to be her: John
From her statement, a very painful story has come out. It happened to a young journalist. An extreme case of harassment. It attacks his reputation. So many women have said it : John
The case against me if that Ramani started it and thereafter people went crazy. Ramani didn't start it. Ghazala herself said that she tweeted on 6/10/2018: John
Ghazala says that in 1997, Asian Age had no mechanism against sexual harassment and female journalist were not encouraged to speak up : John
Sexual harassment has a law. People have begun speaking up. The time we are talking about, had nothing of this like. This is 90s: John
That time, the law had nothing to let women complain internally or externally. Women were hesitant in speaking up. 20 years ago, it was more difficult than today : John
#MeToo came to India in 2018. It wasn't a crime to speak up on #MeToo platform: John
These are acts of extreme courage that require celebration. These are not the acts for which one should face defamatory: John
Face defamation*
Several people spoke up about past incidents and unburdened themselves. They are not guilty: John
We have proved that Akbar's reputation is not impeccable.. Does it mean that all 15 women were petty liars? : John
Did everyone lose their mind in October 2018? Mr Akbar started his defamation campaign only against Ramani. When you isolate, are you singling out someone and why? : John
In defamation cases, if I plead an exception, the onus on me is to prove that exception. But what is the standard of proof? It is simply preponderance of probabilities and not beyond reasonable doubt : John
John refers to a judgement on standard on proof.
Standard of proof*
Per se defamation happens only when I don't plead an exception: John
John reads a judgement to support her claim.
I have pleaded both first and ninth exception: John as she continues to read a judgement.
John moves on to a full Bench judgement by Allahabad High Court.
John comes to KM Nanavati case.

This was the last jury trial case: John begins reading a portion of the judgement.
This case says that unless the statute provides for it, the Prosecution has to prove its case. Once I've lead evidence on preponderance of probabilities, the onus shifts back to the Prosecution: John
It shifts from prosecution to defense to prosecution. Per se comes only when one has not pleaded any exception : John
I've lead evidence. Accused herself has come on the witness box. To dislodge prosecution story, I've applying the test of preponderance of probabilities, proved my case : John
If my truth is accepted, it can't be nobody's case that it is not in public good: John
How will the court believe me? It is seen through these judgements: John
Reputation is central to their case and I've disputed it. I've established my truth: John
Exception 1, 3 and 9 stand satisfied: John
I will conclude on the next date : John
Court proposes taking up the case on December 17.
Hearing adjourned for the day.

Hearing to take place next on December 18 at 2 pm.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

15 Dec
#MadrasHighCourt again suggests that State should have mechanisms to monitor media reports so reported offences can be acted against without waiting for a complaint.

Says print media, visual media reports should be checked.

"Each and everything, let us not wait for a PIL." Image
It is seen there is no mechanism to take note of acts of negligence, damage to public property, civic duties which may be reported in the media, Court notes.

#MadrasHighCourt
Court says there should be a special committee of officials from all government departments which could go into media and social media reports and act to address any reported problems then and there.

#MadrasHighCourt
Read 6 tweets
15 Dec
#BombayHighCourt begins hearing the plea filed by Sunaina Holey accused of making objectionable statements against the Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray and Cabinet Minister Aaditya Thackeray.

@SunainaHoley
@MumbaiPolice
@OfficeofUT
@AUThackeray Image
Bench of Justices SS Shinde and MS Karnik begin hearing the submissions of Advocate Abbi av Chandrachud appearing for Holey.

Chandrachud gives a brief recap of his submissions yesterday before proceeding with his submissions today.
Correction: *Advocate Abhinav Chandrachud
Read 27 tweets
15 Dec
#MadrasHighCourt, Madurai Bench while hearing PIL re misuse of Advocate stickers pasted on vehicles:

"First of all, what is the legal sanctity of the sticker? ... When widely it is misused, and it is reflecting (badly) on the profession, why not the Bar Council give it up?” Image
Court also orally expresses reservations over a proposal that directions may be given so that Advocate stickers are only purchased from the Bar Council, which may be verified by the police.

#MadrasHighCourt
Court: It may not be possible for police to verify if sticker is issued by Bar Council or not.

People are fabricating calling letter and #NEET card. It is not very difficult (to fabricate advocate stickers as well).

#MadrasHighCourt
Read 6 tweets
15 Dec
#BombayHighCourt begins hearing plea of #BhimaKoregaon accused #varavararao raising grievance against violation of his fundamental rights by not providig adequate medical facilties to him. Image
Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh begins by submitting that Rao was in hospital and now as per the hospital he can now be discharged.
Court indicates that they want to hear the plea finally.

ASG pointed out that the reliefs sought by the petitioners are on medical grounds.
Read 18 tweets
15 Dec
#BombayHighCourt is hearing the plea filed by ARG Outlier parent company of Republic TV challenging the FIR filed in the TRP scam case implicating the channel.

@republic
@MumbaiPolice Image
The matter came up in the first half of the court session when the lawyers appearing for ARG Outlier sought for an adjournment so that Sr. Adv. Harish Salve can appear for Goswami through video conferencing tomorrow.
Bench of Justices SS Shinde and MS Karnik hearing the plea asked the lawyer to seek everyone's consent for VC and come at 2.30 pm.
Read 17 tweets
15 Dec
Delhi High Court begins hearing petiton against reservation of 80% ICU beds in private hospitals for COVID-19 patients.

Challenge is by Association of Healthcare Providers (India).

#Covid_19 #ICUbeds

@CMODelhi @LtGovDelhi Image
Petition is before Justice Navin Chawla.
We have filed affidavit and decision of December 11 is filed : ASG Sanjay Jain for Delhi Govt.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!