Did a lot of writing this year. What were my highlights? Here are six: (1) January. What should #Labour do after a humiliating election defeat? TL:DR, sort themselves out, they get taxpayers' money for this and they're a rabble: publicpolicypast.blogspot.com/2020/01/
(4) July again. This time in the @guardian, I argued that Dominic Cummings' ideas were just warmed-over policy tourism, nothing more than a crude load of stereotypes about other countries' 'successes': theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
(5) September. Again in the @guardian, I predicted exactly what was about to happen in Britain's universities... Since Ministers were too lazy to help, they were going to be pitched into a huge #coronavirus crisis: theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
(6) November. I wrote about #Labour's antisemitism crisis for @BritishGQ. The really sinister thing about it was all the people who stayed quiet because it was happening on their 'side', meaning that this could happen again and again: gq-magazine.co.uk/politics/artic…
So that's it really. I hope you liked it all, I hope it was enlightening, enlivening, annoying, right, wrong and all points in between. It wouldn't be worth it otherwise. /END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'd just like to place on record that #NoDealBrexit is just about the worst *political* idea I've ever heard. In the 1000% unlikely event I was advising the PM, I would be extremely strongly against.
It's the classic Weak Man's Strong Man decision, like Steve McClaren dropping David Beckham. Sugar rush of the call, then all your problems get much worse.
It supercharges your opponents, allows Labour all the political landscape, is a *vast* gift to the SNP, revives the Lib Dems - all at a stroke.
Astounding to see how #Labour has acted in three prejudicial ways that challenge law: 1. Timing. Many cases take *years*. One day if you're privileged. 2. Case subject. This case clearly about #antisemitism, even if technically not. One rule *again* on this, another elsewhere.
3. Treatment. This a bit more arguable, but there are signs of backroom dealing.
They have just been found to have *broken the law* *multiple times* on all these fronts. Yet they do it again!
These people are just total amateurs with no understanding of how even a medium-sized public body or private company would act in three circumstances. Just burning through reputation, credit and cash. Hopeless.
It's hard to get the tone right on this, but let's remind ourselves of why #Corbyn is having to go: he was a complete disgrace from start to finish. /THREAD
First and foremost, he made #Labour a frightening and unsafe place for Jews. He was so arrogant he invented a new meaning for the word 'Zionist' and then divided Jews into good and bad. Sinister and frightening.
He turned Labour into a site of hatred, threats and misogyny. His staff covered up and lied, and then covered up and lied some more.
Not on strike today because my branch did not reach the turnout threshold, but solidarity to all those taking action today in the #UCUstrike. It's complicated, but hear me out.
Let's leave the pensions dispute to one side, because it's complicated. I am hopeful of some sort of settlement here. More important are:- (1) Casualisation. Universities are making up for their real terms funding crunch with vastly exploited hourly-paid teachers. Got to stop.
Then there's (2) Pay. Here I've got my own issues with my union's approach. I don't need more pay. Across-the-board % rises in themselves regressive. But the same people being casualised (and everyone 'below') SL needs a big uplift to make the profession competitive.
So often I've thought that he's a very clear-minded and cynical actor, which is great in my book. 👍 That's what politics is about. He waited to resign in summer 2016, then wrote a more-in-sorrow-than-anger letter. That miner in his video was a masterstroke of cynicism.
He gradually eroded Labour's Euroscepticism until he got what he wanted. He appealed to Conference delegates to make him unsackable. I like it. Highly intelligent.
God, this 'on the one hand this, on the other hand that' equivocation from some Labour MPs. Shocking. Look, your party has been occupied at the top by people who hate it. /THREAD
They hate its grassroots trade unionism (which is why they have to stitch up its elections). They hate its liberalism, and all those Liberal MPs who helped to make it in the interwar.
They hate its Methodism. They hate its Christian socialism. They hate its debt to Catholic Social Teaching. They hate its outward-looking pluralism. They hate its commitment to the common corps of Europeanism.