Throughout the Normandy campaign, Allied commanders anticipated that German soldiers would surrender in large numbers, but this... rarely happened.

Why? /1
#WW2 #SWW #History
Throughout the campaign this question vexed the Allies, not least as Intelligence Officers repeatedly felt the enemy was on the cusp of collapse.

Such problems coincided with confusion as to why Army Group B didn't just withdraw to the Seine.

Many didn't understand the enemy./2
About the time of Operation Epsom, German propaganda kicked up a gear as officers enthused about devastating new Vergeltungswaffen (vengeance weapons) devastating London night after night.

With such potent firepower on hand, the British capital was in ruins and victory loomed./3
Both Waffen-SS and Heer were made to listen to compulsory lectures by morale officers and hear dramatic dispatches describing London's destruction.

This was circulated around 2 SS-Panzer.*

*The quote not the meme, obvs. /4
This anchored propaganda directed at the British and dropped over 21st Army Group's lines.

It massively backfired, but that's another story. /5
Other briefings said that London had been completely destroyed and that there were over twelve million civilian casualties...

Yes, twelve million.

If this was true, then victory had to be in sight right? /6
Of course this wasn't true.

Initially morale was buoyed but over time, it started to ebb and quiet cynicism took it's place.

I mean every day the Allied shells and mortar bombs tore over, planes buzzed about, tanks trundled and... it was clear that the tales were exaggerated./7
That said... there was an air of pessimism from the top level down, as Rommel warned Wolfgang Pickert back on 6 June.

This got worse over time, esp with OKW's meddling, Hitler's grand plans and Jodl & Keitel's backbiting. /8
Erhard Beck in 277 Artillerie respected the Waffen-SS but, "they were not... to be envied.. they were ambitious and splendid soldiers. We respected them... for us the war had been lost for some time. What counted was to survive." /9
Waffen-SS soldiers had already gone through punishing indoctrination regimes with indiscretions harshly punished.

I mean harsh. Those who broke military law could be sent to the SS punishment camp at Dachau or topenal companies.

They were the lowest of the low. /10
Punishment at Dachau varied massively, and is the subject for another time, SS inmates were officially sent there for hard labour etc.

In reality this was supplemented by continued abuse, beatings, violence, sexual assault and rape.

And random execution. /11
Although propaganda permeated within the Heer, it was much more ingrained into the Waffen-SS with political education at all levels.

It was impossible for one to become a Waffen-SS officer without being a pretty ardent devotee to National Socialism. /12
There is evidence that some substantial cadres of 9th SS-Panzer Division were effectively 'volunteered' for service with light suggestions of cowardice and violence if they did not to so, with dissenters publicly humiliated. /13
British soldiers were repeatedly astounded by Waffen-SS soldiers who refused to surrender, especially younger soldiers.

The youngest cohorts had only really known Nazi education and to say they were radicalised is an understatement, most were fervent adherents to the cause. /14
Reports soon emerged from field hospitals and RAPs painted a worrying image, as Jewish doctors were spat at, nurses cursed and blood transfusions refused.

This stunned and horrified many IOs, as they struggled to comprehend the mindset that could bring this about. /15
Even so, some SS commanders felt that indoctrination had jumped the shark even in '43.

During 10th SS-Panzer's formation their comd, Lothar Debes, ordered his subordinates to change the racially focused subject matter of a lecture to focus on inner character and achievement./16
Although many civilians were treated well during the German evacuation of civilians from the battle area, British soldiers did encounter those who were locked into cellars and left to die by the Waffen-SS. /17
As positive reinforcement crumbled, more extreme methods were sought.

Propaganda officers did the rounds to brief men what would happen if they surrendered.

After the war, lists would be collated and those who were taken prisoner would undergo trial.

Regardless who won. /18
Some suggested they'd be considered traitors and executed.

Regardless who won.

Seriously, let that sink in. /19
Other lectures informed them how the Allies never took prisoners.

They executed captives. /20
This, combined with knowledge of the dire events at home and Germany's strategic predicament really did help prevent wholesale collapse... altho' the incident at Maltot in July does stand out as a watershed moment.

tldr Eastern Front vets just gave up en-mass. /21
Allied int continued to overly rely on testimony from deserters and more agreeable prisoners, and struggled to comprehend why the enemy was fighting in this manner.

In part, at least, what the extremes encountered were felt to be nonsensical and just beyond reason. /thread

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Ware

Jonathan Ware Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ReassessHistory

11 Jan
So how easy was it for British & Canadian soldiers to keep clean and healthy in Normandy?

Couldn't be too hard, right? /1
#WW2 #SWW #History Image
You're an front line infantryman in a two man covered slit trench. Maybe 100m from the enemy

From dawn to dusk you're hunched underground, making the best of things in a covered trench 6' long, 3' deep and 2 1/2' wide or so.

With your mate crammed in there with you. /2 Image
You know you're under constant observation by enemy observers and marksmen, who scan the ground looking to punish any foolish or unlucky opportunity target.

They may not get you, but their rounds may well kill or maim your friends. /3 Image
Read 20 tweets
9 Jan
So when it first appeared in Normandy, the Sherman Firefly and it's meaty 17 pounder represented an ideal combo of reliable chassis, great gun and devastating firepower right?

Ummm...

Truth is a bit more complex. /1
#WW2 #SWW #History
Deliveries of Firefly to units only commenced in April 1944,
just a few weeks before Overlord & left minimal time for familiarisation.

Armoured Regiments mostly utilised Fireflies on a basis of 1 per troop of 4 tanks. /2
Finally each armoured regiment troop had access to integral, meaty, anti-tank firepower capable of dealing serious damage to any German AFV likely to be encountered. /3
Read 25 tweets
8 Jan
The Luftwaffe took a massive pounding over Normandy.

As the Heer's ammunition supplies interdicted by Allied tactical aircraft, Luftflotte III tasked medium bombers such as the Ju88 to hit British arty, employing night time airpower as overwhelming counter battery. /1
#WW2 #SWW
Army Group B was losing the battle of attrition thanks to a cocktail of Allied advances.

Superior artillery, sigint, counter-battery, AOP, survey, sound ranging, logistics, POL, and prioritisation of unloading 25 Pdr and 5.5" shells, all favoured Second Army. /2
The Royal Artillery's professionalism as a technical arm of service really showed itself, as did the need to keep the guns fed - so what did Second Army do?

Build the mega Bayeux bypass, bridges, huge tank tracks dedicated for tracked vehicles to take them off other routes. /3
Read 19 tweets
8 Jan
So what tanks did 2 Fife and Forfar Yeomanry, divisional cavalry regiment, have before fully upgrading to Vickers Mk VI before going to Northern Ireland in June 1940?

Well...

It's another dive into Invasion Summer: 1940!* /1
*Memes and pics.
#WW2 #SWW #History
2 FFY formed from 1 FFY's B Sqn in March 1939 when Chamberlain made the fundamentally bloody bonkers decision mega-belated decision to double the TA.

A recruiting frenzy followed and within 14 days they hit full establishment of 32 officers and 403 ORs ./2
Lt-Col Alexander 'Sandy' McIntosh commanded the regt, having served as B Sqn's OC prior to duplication. Educated at Merchiston Castle School, he became a director of a furniture manufacturing business in Kirkcaldy, damned competent in leadership, direction and overseeing men.* /3
Read 17 tweets
6 Jan
So after Dunkirk, did Britain really stand alone or in a prime strategic position ready to assail any invasion?*

Umm... let's look at the Home Forces and Territorial Army a bit. /1

*Sealion is STILL not viable.
#WW2 #SWW #History ImageImage
It is really, really, really, REALLY, hard to see the crisis in June/July 1940 through a jolly lens.

Whilst much of the BEF managed to make it back to Britain, they left huge stocks of kit, guns, equipment, uniforms, webbing, ammunition, motor transport and AFVs in France. /2 ImageImageImageImage
Even before the fall of France, the Army had actually been short of tons of kit - with the situation steadily improving on the continent, less so in Britain.

The photographic record for Home Forces during this period is pretty shit, so there will some memes. You are warned./3 Image
Read 24 tweets
23 Oct 20
A brief thread on technological fetishism in #WW2, #military #history, #PME and how it's held us back.

This tweet's a great case study on how we can look at tanks outside of any context and embrace a top trumps approach to complex topics. /1

#SWW
So we look at Cromwell through firepower and protection, and note popularity with Armoured Reconnaissance Regts.

OFC Cromwell mostly served in Armd Recce Regts so... it's a bit like saying, "I like cheese in a cheese sandwich."

Not particularly insightful. /2
Of course it's notable that developments in munitions also left the latest German weapons vulnerable to the latest Allied weapons.

By this stage of the war technology has leaped ahead, and even this line still plays to subtle fetishism of German kit of being superior.

Was it?/3
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!