Ankit Panda Profile picture
19 Jan, 9 tweets, 1 min read
Austin takes on the civ-mil issues up front. Emphasizes that USD(P) (@ColinKahl) will be included in high-level decision-making.
Austin pledges to "stamp our sexual assault" and "to rid our ranks of racists and extremists."
"While I did not seek this job, I consider it an honor," Austin says. "I will uphold the principle of civilian control of the military as intended."
Austin ends his remarks; Inhofe immediately calls him "General Austin."🤦🏽‍♂️
Inhofe now asking Austin about the necessity of the nuclear triad, describing nuclear deterrence as DoD's most important responsibility. "I personally support the triad," says Austin.
Inhofe pop quizzes Austin on Western Saharan self-determination. (?) Not sure I grok the sequencing of these questions.
Tom Cotton says he opposes a waiver for Austin, adding that he regrets supporting a waiver for Mattis (and that George Marshall shouldn't have gotten a waiver either).
Not often I say this, but I don't think I disagreed with a single part of Cotton's justification for opposing a waiver.
Coda: Do I expect Cotton to maintain his principled opposition the next time a GOP president puts forward a retired general for a waiver? Not quite.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ankit Panda

Ankit Panda Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nktpnd

20 Jan
This doesn't get said enough. Everything can't matter equally and we should be creating incentives for local partners to step up; don't ignore the IOR, but recognize that it's not the fulcrum for US interests in Asia.
This was gnawing at me during the whole First Fleet trial balloon. Resources are already thin and overstretched; over-emphasizing the IOR is a setup for failure. India and Australia should be taking the lead.
Along these lines, I've admired the clarity in some Indian strategic documents (like the Maritime Security Strategy), which notes clear "primary" and "secondary" areas of interest for New Delhi in Indo-Pacific. It's okay to say certain things matter less than others.
Read 4 tweets
20 Jan
There's a big error in this document pertaining to North Korea's ICBMs that I think is worth digging into. It's disappointing for an IC product.
The document notes that "North Korea debuted the Hwasong-14 ICBM in an October 2015 parade." (USIC calls the October 2015 ICBM mockups the KN14, but this designator system is not used in the NASIC report.) Image
Page 28 of the NASIC report then includes this photograph, from North Korea's July 4, 2017, launch of an *actual* Hwasong-14 ICBM (KN20). The caption notes it's a "modified Hwasong-14." Image
Read 15 tweets
19 Jan
NASIC's quadrennial ballistic and cruise missile threat report is out. media.defense.gov/2021/Jan/11/20…
Come on, NASIC. KN14 is not Hwasong-14.
If DF-41 is no longer CSS-X-20 (the 'X' implying developmental) then this sentence doesn't really make sense. Is the DF-41 past the development phase or not?
Read 20 tweets
19 Jan
Yes. And note that it comes on the same day Pompeo swipes at "multiculturalism." Hard for me to take the concerns of people who wouldn't want a practicing Muslim Uyghur family for neighbors seriously.
Calling what's happening in Xinjiang a genocide is warranted by the facts. It should have happened earlier.
And this is not about boxing in the incoming Biden team. Because they agree.
Read 4 tweets
15 Jan
First high resolution shots from #NorthKorea’s latest military parade.
One more of the new SRBM.
And, for convenience, a few close-ups of the new SLBM (Pukguksong-5) and the new unnamed solid-fuel SRBM.
Read 6 tweets
14 Jan
Well. There we go. #NorthKorea
Pukguksong-5?
New short-range solid fuel missiles.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!