Before 11/08/16, I was secretly planning on shutting down (or at least mothballing) ACASignups.net as soon as the 4th #ACA Open Enrollment period was over. Traffic had been gradually dropping off as people got used to the ACA & it started to fade from the headlines.
My official day job as a website developer had suffered. What was supposed to have been a 6-month hobby in my spare time had turned into a full-time job, and I had lost web clients along the way. I figured it would be time to wind down ACA Signups & refocus on my web business.
Instead...well, you know what happened. On 11/09/16, I changed the header to this graphic, assuming that the #ACA was doomed. I even registered ACASignOffs.net and redirected it to the site.
I intended to keep the revised header up for 24 hours as a symbol of grief.
I was immediately flooded with texts, DMs, emails etc. from people pleading with me to keep the site up & running because "it's needed more than ever" etc etc. Instead of 24 hours, I ended up swapping it back again within an hour or so.
In addition, the day after the 2016 election saw over 100,000 people enroll via HC.gov in a single day. If the ACA was facing imminent death, you'd never know it from the 2017 numbers.
2017 saw the battle over Obamacare turn into a full-scale war of attrition, as Congressional Republicans crapped out one slapped-together garbage "replacement" bill after another. The Senate version was literally called #BCRAp. No, seriously. acasignups.net/17/03/06/after…
This chapter culminated in absurdly dramatic fashion with a vote in the wee early hours of July 28th, 2017, when, thanks to every Democratic Senator w/assists from Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski and John McCain's famous "thumbs down", the ACA was saved: acasignups.net/19/07/28/not-c…
Trump *thought* he got "revenge" in October 2017 by gleefully doing what he'd been threatening to do all year: "Blow up the exchanges" by cutting off CSR payments...which basically amounts to him stiffing contractors out of payments due, big shocker. acasignups.net/17/10/19/sword…
The thing is, Trump didn't know how CSR subsidies work. He thought he was screwing poor people. Instead, he was screwing carriers. His sabotage attempt may have worked anyway IF the carriers had bailed, and at least a few did, like HAP here in Michigan... acasignups.net/17/09/15/michi…
...but a funny thing happened instead. Due to the way CSR subsidies, APTC subsidies & policy premiums interact, the carriers, regulators & exchanges came up w/a pricing workaround which solved their problem *and* made policies *more* affordable for many. acasignups.net/18/05/23/four-…
The GOP *was* able to cut a pound of flesh out of the ACA in Dec. 2017 by zeroing out the federal individual mandate penalty (though the change didn't actually go into effect until 2019)...unsubsidized enrollees were hit with higher premiums as a result:
.nytimes.com/2018/12/27/opi…
...but even that didn't end up being as bad as expected (I estimated avg. 2019 premiums were ~8% higher than they'd otherwise have been, vs. the 20%+ higher that some had feared). Slashing the marketing & navigator budgets hurt enrollment somewhat, tho. acasignups.net/17/09/04/exclu…
Having failed to kill the #ACA legislatively, the Trump Admin, and CMS Administrator Seema Verma in particular, turned to see what they could do to sabotage it administratively instead.
Meanwhile, Trump issued an executive order to flood the market with #ShortAssPlans...not merely reversing Obama-era regulations on junk plans, but actively pushing these non-ACA compliant plans *hard*. acasignups.net/18/02/20/364-n…
Then Verma gutted Section 1332 of the #ACA. This section is supposed to allow states to experiment with the ACA *as long as doing so provides at least as comprehensive coverage* to *at least as many people* w/out raising the deficit, but... acasignups.net/18/11/29/red-a…
There was a BUNCH of other stuff Trump & Verma did to hack away at the ACA around the edges...but to their great frustration, like the first Rocky movie, the law refused to go down no matter how much it was bloodied.
But the Trump Admin. had one more trick up their sleeve: An idiotic lawsuit filed by 20 GOP hack AGs which used an absurdly warped legal interpretation roundly laughed at across the political legal spectrum to try and kill the law: The #TexasFoldEm case: acasignups.net/18/06/10/texas…
As stupid as the #TexasFoldEm case is (and believe me, I've written countless times how insanely stupid it is), it somehow managed to make its way all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments one week after the 2020 election. acasignups.net/20/11/11/texas…
The good news is that in spite of the newly-Trump friendly 6-3 makeup of the Court, the oral arguments did *not* go well for the plaintiffs. Even Justice *Alito* seemed awfully skeptical that the case had any merit.
HOWEVER...as @nicholas_bagley always says, even a small chance of a terrible thing happening is still a chance.
Anyway, we'll see what happens. I promise to continue to keep you posted on the latest craziness surrounding the #ACA, both good and bad, for as long as I can.
One way to help ensure I can keep doing so is to support my work either once or monthly: acasignups.net/donate
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The responses to this are absurdly stupid. We passed 410,000 deaths yesterday. Anyone dying for the next several weeks contracted #COVID19 before 1/20, and the worst daily toll will likely hit in around a week (~5,000).
Even if Biden were somehow able to magically bring the total number of new cases down to 0 *TODAY* that'd still be a good 75,000 more Americans dying by mid-February.
And we've been *averaging* 220,000 cases/day in January so far.
Let's say that Biden's #COVID19 team were able to (again, magically) reduce the number of new cases by 5% *each and every day* *starting today* (again, magic!). That would still mean another 130,000 or so deaths by the end of March (at which point it'd be down to ~250/day).
Personally, at the bare minimum they should flip the filibuster rule around so that you have to have 40 *affirmative* "nay" votes in order to block a bill instead of 60 affirmative "yea" votes. This may sound like a distinction w/out a difference but it matters.
Right now members of the filibustering side get to use it as a shield--they never go on the record as formally opposing a popular bill because there was no floor vote in the first place. This at least forces them to own their vote.
The upside of using a soft 'n fuzzy name like "BadgerCare" or Healthy Michigan" is that, like the "kynect" saga in Kentucky, it makes it easier to get people to actually sign up for the program, which is the most important goal. 3/
Since Ted Cruz is trending tonight for his idiotic "Paris Accord must mean it's only for people who live in Paris!" tweet, a reminder that neither Cruz *nor* Trump supporters are exactly the brightest bulbs in the socket.
Fun fact: “NewsBusters” is the only right-wing rag which has ever published an actual hit piece on me. They cleverly called it “Gaba In, Gaba Out” because “Gaba” kind of sounds a little like “Garbage”, see?
The premise of their deep investigation of me was that I’m not an unbiased source (which I never claimed to be) and that I’m active in local Democratic organizations (as I clearly had stated in my bio). Fine detective work, fellas.
No clue how @SenSchumer will do on actual legislation, but he's doing a good job with this speech...on Pres. Biden, VP Harris, Sens. Ossoff, Warnock & Padilla, & the Dem Senate Majority.
Shouldn't the @senatemajldr handle be shifted from McConnell to Sen. Schumer, @Twitter?
NO LONGER ACCURATE.
Senate MINORITY leader Mitch McConnell is now pushing hard on the "bipartisan/unity" angle.