Important new study by Wibmer et al (biorxiv.org/content/10.110…) of neutralization by convalescent sera on wildtype vs 501Y.V2 variant viruses circulating in South Africa. It shows that mutations present in 501Y.V2 result in reduced neutralization capacity. 1/10
Here, I've replotted data from the preprint to make effect size a bit more clear. Each line is sera from one individual tested against wildtype virus on the left and 501Y.V2 variant virus on the right. Note the log y axis (as is common with this type of data). 2/10
It's clear that 501Y.V2 often results in reductions of neutralization titer, quantified as "fold-reduction" where, for example, a 2-fold reduction in titer would mean that you need twice as much sera to neutralize the same amount of virus in the assay. 3/10
Here, I'm plotting distribution of fold-reduction across the 44 individuals tested. You can see there is a median 8-fold reduction in titer when comparing wildtype to 501Y.V2 virus, though some individuals show no reduction and other individuals show a 64-fold reduction. 4/10
To put an 8-fold drop in context, the @WHO uses an 8-fold threshold when deciding to update the seasonal influenza vaccine (note this is a different virus and neutralization results may not be directly comparable, but it at least gives a ballpark comparison). 5/10
Also note that the mRNA vaccines in particular are really good vaccines and elicit strong immune responses. A reduction in neutralization from a high starting point will have less of an impact than a reduction from a lower starting point. 6/10
We urgently need "immune correlates of protection" determined for COVID-19 vaccination. This would allow extrapolation from reductions in neutralization into expected effects on vaccine efficacy. At the moment, it's guesswork. 7/10
However, if these results are confirmed by further studies, my guess based on the seasonal influenza comparison is that we need to investigate the manufacturing timeline and regulatory steps required to update the "strain" used in the vaccine. 8/10
501Y.V2 is still largely restricted to South Africa, but it (or other antigenically drifted variants) may spread more widely in the coming months. I would be planning this potential "strain" update for fall 2021. 9/10
And all this said, I'll be getting the vaccine as soon as I'm able. We have an amazing vaccine now that works against currently circulating viruses. And if it becomes necessary, this emerging situation can be dealt with through a forthcoming vaccine update. 10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
At this point, the countries with most genomic data to analyze spread of the variant virus belonging to cov-lineages.org B.1.1.7 lineage or @nextstrain clade 20I/501Y.V1 are the UK, Denmark and the USA. Here I compare growth rates of B.1.17 across these countries. 1/13
Working from @GISAID data, the UK has 18776 genomes, Denmark has 6089 genomes and the USA has 3093 genomes from specimens collected after Dec 15, 2020. Here, I'm looking at daily genomes with collection dates up to Jan 6 that were not pre-screened by "S dropout". 2/13
For the UK, we can see a steady increase in the frequency of sequenced variant viruses belonging to the B.1.1.7 lineage, reaching ~70% frequency at the end of December. Solid line is a 7 day sliding window average. 3/13
After ~10 months of relative quiescence we've started to see some striking evolution of SARS-CoV-2 with a repeated evolutionary pattern in the SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern emerging from the UK, South Africa and Brazil. 1/19
In SARS-CoV-2, the viral spike protein and in particular the receptor binding domain (RBD) is a locus for important viral evolution and is the primary target for the human immune response (figure from science.sciencemag.org/content/367/64…). 2/19
There had been little evolution in the RBD until ~Oct 2020 when we saw RBD mutations start to spread. Perhaps chief among mutations of interest are E484K and N501Y which mutate nearby sites in the RBD. The evolution of these sites can be seen here: nextstrain.org/ncov/global?c=…. 3/19
With data that has emerged in the last week, I'm now 80-90% convinced that infections by the UK variant virus (Pangolin lineage B.1.1.7, @nextstrain clade 20B/501Y.V1) result in, on average, more onward infections, ie are more transmissible. 1/10
My thinking primarily comes from three data points: 1. rapid increase in frequency of variant over wildtype 2. higher secondary attack rate of variant than wildtype 3. increased viral loads of variant over wildtype as measured by Ct
2/10
For point 1 (increase in frequency) we have pretty much the same data as of a week ago, where we see increasing frequency of variant over wildtype across the UK. This can be readily seen in this analysis by @TWenseleers. 3/10
Given that the US has not detected SARS-CoV-2 variant viruses 501Y.V1 or 501Y.V2, what bounds can we place on their current frequency in the US based on sample counts? 1/12
However, because the US is generally slower at turnaround of specimens into SARS-CoV-2 sequences than the UK, we lack confidence that 501Y.V variants are absent from the US. 3/12
Given the large discrepancy in specimens collected in Dec that were sequenced and shared between the US and the UK, I wanted to follow up on the relative quality of genomic surveillance in the US and the UK. 1/12
First thing to clarify, in the @nytopinion opinion piece yesterday (nytimes.com/2020/12/22/opi…), it's mentioned that "since Dec. 1, Britain has sequenced more than 3,700 coronavirus cases, compared with fewer than 40 cases in the United States, according to Trevor Bedford". 2/12
As of today, the UK has shared to @GISAID 23,377 genomes during Dec and the US has shared 8033 genomes. However, the UK turnaround time has been much faster with 5010 specimens that were collected in Dec shared vs 65 collected in Dec and shared by the US. 3/12
Following up on general thoughts on antigenic drift of #COVID19 from this weekend, I wanted to discuss what we know about the new variant of SARS-CoV-2 thats emerged in the UK. 1/17
This variant is referred to as the B.1.1.7 lineage in cov-lineages.org nomenclature and clade 20B/501Y.V1 in @nextstrain nomenclature and can be seen here within circulating viral diversity, where the variant lineage is highlighted in orange (nextstrain.org/ncov/europe?c=…). 2/17
Broadly, I'd characterize the source of concern as arising from the combination of: 1. Multiple mutations that from sequence composition alone are suggestive of biological importance 2. Observed rapid epidemic spread
3/17