The @CareQualityComm inspection report which found @TaviAndPort#GIDS service to be ‘inadequate’ is a truly shocking read. We are appalled at the spin that this is just about waiting times. It is not. This is a #safeguarding scandal. Full report here:
Questions must be asked (and answered) about why so many children were experiencing distress around gender in the first place. What has gone wrong in our society? Why are we failing to challenge gender stereotypes? What are children looking at online?
The regulatory capture in our society has gone so far that even the @CareQualityComm report into this scandal uses highly contested, ideological language such as ‘assigned sex at birth’. This must stop. Sex is observed at birth, usually by medical professionals.
We thank @ChildrensComm & all others who raised concerns to enable this inspection to take place. We are appalled at the inadequate standards of care & #safeguarding that these very vulnerable children have been subjected to. As a society we must reflect on how this has occurred.
We believe the inadequate record keeping, more details of which have been exposed by the #KeiraBell case, verges on criminal. Failing to work together with other professionals is a failing repeatedly found in Serious Case Reviews, once children have been seriously harmed.
The fact that some staff said they ‘felt unable to raise concerns without fear of retribution’ is horrifying & certainly not conducive to the effective #safeguarding of children. It is also disturbing that not all staff were up to date with mandatory training.
Anybody working with children must be up to date with all applicable #safeguarding training. They must be alert to all potential concerns at all times. It is paramount that they feel supportes to voice any concerns that they have.
It is bizarre that ‘a young person taking an overdose of over-the-counter medicines after their therapeutic session evoked traumatic memories’ & ‘member of the public posting abusive messages about the service on social media’ are seen as comparable, both described as ‘incidents’
Reading through, our shock increases on every page. Statements such as:
“Staff had only recently begun to record consent & capacity or competence clearly for young people who might have impaired mental capacity or competence.”
must not be overshadowed by waiting time concerns.
“the service provided an illustrated guide to puberty & hormone blockers for young people who may find it difficult to read detailed text” We find it absolutely staggering that children who needed pictorial guides were ever deemed capable to consent to potential sterilisation.
This sentence; “There appeared to be no framework for discharge other than young people reaching the age of 18.” appears to contravene claims that puberty blockers are merely a ‘pause button’ This is backed up by the recent judgement in the #KeiraBell case.
We would encourage people to read the report in full then support @KLBfax by either sharing or donating to the crowdfunder for her upcoming appeal
THREAD
We have been sent these screenshots from a Facebook group of teachers unofficially affiliated with a major union.
We are disturbed to see this misinformation and lack of understanding of safeguarding being circulated.
We agree that it is important for school staff to be mindful of any trans-identified student in their care, suffering from mental distress (or any students experiencing mental distress for whatever reason).
We understand that the #KeiraBell case will have caused distress to some, especially given the dangerous narrative being irresponsibly pushed that this will make children suicidal and was an attack on their rights, not an action to safeguard and protect them.
Safe Schools Alliance believe that school should be a safe environment for children to learn to discuss difficult issues respectfully, allowing for differences of opinion.
There will be serious knock-on effects for the rest of society if children are not given the opportunity to have open, honest and respectful discussions, and to be able to ‘agree to disagree’ with others.
Children should not be criminalised unless absolutely necessary; robust school policies that place safeguarding at their core, and acknowledge that children may need guidance in learning these skills, are best placed to deal with ‘non-crime hate incidents’. #edutwitter
From today’s judgement in the #KeiraBell case: “The third Intervener is @Transgendertrd, an organisation that provides evidence- based information & resources for parents & schools concerning children with GD. @cwknews is the director of that organisation...
she has filed a witness statement in these proceedings.
She set out concerns about the lack of evidence as to the impacts & effectiveness of PBs & in relation to which patients it is most likely to help. Much of her evidence focused on the increase of referrals to GIDS of...
teenage natal girls & the cultural factors, including material on the internet & social media, which may play a part in this. She said that GIDS does not offer young people with GD a range of ways to interpret their experience, & the GIDS pathway offers a minimal challenge to...
It is heartening how many individuals & businesses have responded to @MarcusRashford’s appeal to help children needing #FSM over half term. It is really encouraging that many people care about keeping children safe & healthy so they can grow up in the best possible circumstances
#safeguarding must always come first though. We are alarmed at some of the offers of help we have seen. We must not normalise unsafe practises such as encouraging online contact from kids, going to meet adults they don’t know & taking gifts from strangers. Safeguards must be used
We know people want to help but this must be done safely or the consequences could be severe. Sadly children have frequently been groomed with food. The guardian has reported here. Boys are more usually groomed into the drug trade. #ENDCHILDFOODPOVERTY
Tanya Carter says : “The BBC is promoting a damaging ideology to children. In so doing, they are breaching their own guidelines on editorial impartiality and the 1996 Education Act, which stipulates that an education provider cannot promote a political ideology to children”.