Hasn't been a week, but @POTUS has a diplomatic headache.
A #FakeNews story that 2 Hindu Americans holding senior roles in the Biden campaign are not being given jobs in the Administration because of ties to "RSS/BJP" is causing outrage. How did this happen? Let's unpack: 1/
First, the Indian American Muslim Council teamed w/ a few internet handles to write a hypocritical open letter demanding those 2 Hindus not be given prominent roles. Why hypocritical? No mention at all of a nominee with ties to the shadowy separatist Stand With Kashmir front. 2/
Not to mention that the claim is false & horribly mean-spirited. The 2 Hindu Americans being targeted have never had ties to Indian politics. The claim is that their fathers were friends with some Indian leaders--but the father of one of those targeted passed away years ago. 3/
Then, Pieter Friedrich, the gadfly "South Asia expert" funded by an IAMC co-founder, highlighted the IAMC letter in a Medium piece, implying that @JoeBiden had delivered a stinging rebuke to BJP/RSS by excluding anyone with ties to them. This was too tempting a story for some 4/
The @thewire_in & @thetribunechd ran this story with no sourcing or confirmation. The story quickly spread among Indian opposition party mouthpieces like @NH_India.
the @WhiteHouse seems to have tried to quash the false story & legit journalists determined it was fake. 4/
But it was too late. The fake story made it into vernacular press--and more important into WhatsApp/Signal chat groups. Folks in India are incredulous.
And now the Biden team has a headache to deal with and will be forced to allay outrage among sections of India's government.5/
There will be many efforts to pressure the Biden Administration on India. The Indian govt. can deal w/ that. But all Americans must strongly oppose any targeting of Hindu & Indian Ams on charges of dual loyalty, amplified by anti-Hindu activists and peddled by fake news outlets.
Addendum: Have received many questions about the bonafides of those who signed the "open letter" that Friedrich and irresponsible sections of Indian media amplified. Several anti-Hindu hate groups among them. Here you go 👇:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is a disturbing tendency among groups in the diaspora to religionize what are fundamentally political reactions to political actions. This religionizing creates a binary where every political actor & policy is necessarily pro-x or anti-y. 1/n
In this paradigm, abrogation #Article370 is anti-Muslim ignoring KP's and its anti-terror ramification. #CAA a pro-persecuted minority amnesty law is anti-Muslim, and the protests glorified. Now the #FarmersBill is portrayed as a anti-Sikh and protests romanticized. 2/
The protests are, in fact, merging, as anti-CAA #Dadi & a Dalit political party head join the farmers. But when roads & highways are blocked for months on end, at some point, commuters will demand roads are opened. But the religionized context-artificially constructed-means 3/
Rupa, you make my point when you & media orthodoxy conflate Hindu nationalism with Modi, hence India. Ergo, supporting US-India ties (nuclear deal, defense coop) & Indian policies=Hindu nationalism, & any policy disfavored by the ecosystem=anti-Muslim. (thread)
@HinduAmerican was founded in 2003 and promoted U.S-India ties throughout MMS govt.
@HinduAmerican believes that free speech, religious liberty & equality are principles that are good for Hindus in America and around the world are good for all people regardless of faith or none.
Is supporting U.S.-India ties, abrogation #Article370 to fight cross-border terror & promote KP resettlement, amnesty for religious minorities seeking refuge or end to govt. control of temples nationalism or parochial?
Why circumscribe freedom of religion issues as nationalism?
@AmarShergillCA is a Democrat, but doesn't:
-deny connections to @FriedrichPieter's campaign to smear Hindu American candidates & donors
-deny his connections to a CA based Khalistan operative
-deny his attacks on @TulsiGabbard@RepBera & other Democrats
That a senior CA @TheDemocrats party leader is not condemning-but amplifying-attacks on only Hindu American candidates, is an election scandal of 2020 for our community.
My friend @dhume analogizes social media outrage over a racy depiction of the Goddess Kali with the beheading in France. Raises the Enlightenment. I agree that Hindu anger on social media is often crass/crude (experienced it!), but sharing some quick thoughts (thread)
Comparing inchoate tweets to a beheading in France or an attack on a politician in Bangalore over a FB post fails as an equivalence in my eyes. @dhume may be right in Hindu outrage seeming new when deities are defiled, but there's a reason certain speech was outlawed in India.
Muslim demands that certain speech be made off-limits led to hate speech laws in the Indian Constitution. Hindus reciprocating utilizing those extant laws is more a response to what they see as Muslim success in rendering speech that's intended to outrage or insulting as criminal
-hired Pakistani activist to write anti-India report hinduamerican.org/blog/us-religi…
-held multiple hearings perpetuating misinformation on India
-falsely alleged Indian hospitals separate patients based on religion