My friend @dhume analogizes social media outrage over a racy depiction of the Goddess Kali with the beheading in France. Raises the Enlightenment. I agree that Hindu anger on social media is often crass/crude (experienced it!), but sharing some quick thoughts (thread)
Comparing inchoate tweets to a beheading in France or an attack on a politician in Bangalore over a FB post fails as an equivalence in my eyes. @dhume may be right in Hindu outrage seeming new when deities are defiled, but there's a reason certain speech was outlawed in India.
Muslim demands that certain speech be made off-limits led to hate speech laws in the Indian Constitution. Hindus reciprocating utilizing those extant laws is more a response to what they see as Muslim success in rendering speech that's intended to outrage or insulting as criminal
Galileo was jailed for arguing that Earth revolved around the sun. So France's hard secularism that @dhume seems to admire is rooted in a hard break between the Dark Ages and the European Enlightenment. India's historical trajectory is different & secularism defined differently.
Indian/Hindu civilization is predicated on a pluralistic worldview -- Ekam Sat -- accepts existence of more than one path to Truth/God/Guy in the Sky, does not proselytize, and has no conflict with physics, astronomy, evolution, etc. Social evils, retrograde thoughts? Of course.
But India doesn't need a Judeo-Christian Enlightenment. Solution to problems, prejudices, patriarchy, etc. is right there in Vedanta, Upanishads, Gita. Vishesha-dharma requires fighting adharma. Time and place matter. So how do we go about it? With truth, restraint & compassion.
May I offer my approach to Meena Harris' depiction of Durga as an example. Don't take the bait. Don't pile on. Explain, contextualize, educate. If you champion free speech, use your voice to argue and convince.
Having a right to say something doesn't necessarily make it right. And remember and be proud of the fact that the Dharmic traditions have flourished because of an intrinsic freedom of thought & exploration that opens up when there's no fixation on only one way or one true God.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
-hired Pakistani activist to write anti-India report hinduamerican.org/blog/us-religi…
-held multiple hearings perpetuating misinformation on India
-falsely alleged Indian hospitals separate patients based on religion
A disgraceful piece, and illustrates so much about popular #Hinduphobia in the media that @HinduAmerican highlights daily. Let's count the ways: 1) Ostensibly document recent events in #Kashmir, but completely erase #kashmiripandits. Not a single mention. None. (thread)
@HinduAmerican 2)Tie revocation of Art 370 to the tired, overused media narratives of Gujarat/Godhra, hagiography of @RanaAyyub, Ram temple, RSS, etc, without a single bit of original reporting. Could just read the annual (discredited) @USCIRF report instead. Goal is to make 370 about Islam (2)
@HinduAmerican@RanaAyyub@USCIRF 3)No context that the revocation of 370 is about equal protection, one law for all Indians, that those pushing for "self-determination" are pushing for a theocratic state. Dexter Filkins reported extensively on #ISIS in Iraq, but ignores #ISIS flags being unfurled in Kashmir. (3)
Whenever @narendramodi comes to town, Hindus like @tulsigabbard and Hindu orgs come under attack by activists trying to connect them to Hindu nationalism. @mehdihasan takes it further by connecting them to a mass murderer. This is wrong. This is tiring. This is Hinduphobia. 1/5
@mehdihasan claims Anders Breivik was motivated to kill by Hindu nationalism. Breivik repudiates Hindu nationalism in failing to take to the streets. He never even mentions the RSS. But Breivik mentions Christianity over 2,000x, Bible more than 300x, Zionism/Jews 300x.2/5
Would @mehdihasan point to Islamic scripture or Muslim advocates as responsible for ISIS or 9/11 since OBL used them to justify his attack? He wouldn't, because it would be wrong. But Hindus are uniquely acceptable to be targeted thus? 3/5