Bloom Lab Profile picture
25 Jan, 10 tweets, 4 min read
Our study mapping #SARSCoV2 mutations that escape key therapeutic monoclonal antibodies is out in @ScienceMagazine. The study also shows that some of these escape mutations arise in a persistently infected patient treated with REGN-CoV-2: science.sciencemag.org/content/early/… (1/n)
I previously summarized the pre-print (), so in this thread I'll just update on new insights since we posted the pre-print in late November. (2/n)
In the study, we mapped all mutations to #SARSCoV2 RBD that escape binding by recombinant forms of antibodies in REGN-CoV2 cocktail (Regeneron) and LY-CoV016 antibody (Eli Lilly). These maps are useful because some of these mutations are appearing in new viral lineages (3/n).
Before summarizing key mutations, I'll add that at end of last week @tylernstarr just got data for recombinant form of LY-CoV555 (lead Eli Lilly) antibody. Not sure when we will have time to write paper on that, so I'm posting data below in same form as Figure 1A of paper. (4/n)
Here are impacts of mutations at some key sites on REGN-COV2 antibodies (REGN10933 and REGN01987), LY-CoV555, and LY-CoV016:

E484: mutations reduce binding by LY-CoV555 and to lesser extent REGN10933, little effect on REGN01987 or LY-CoV016. (5/n)
N501: mutations have little effect on any of the antibodies.

K417: mutations reduce binding by LY-CoV016 and REGN10933, little effect on REGN1097 or LY-CoV555

L452: mutations reduce binding by LY-CoV555, little effect on REGN10933, REGN01987, LY-CoV016. (6/n)
Importantly, these maps also have data for all other possible mutations, so as new mutations appear you can check if therapeutic antibodies will be impacted. Important to monitor this, since some of the antibodies are affected by mutations already appearing. (7/n)
Two other main findings in the paper. First, it describes how viral antibody-escape mutations arose in persistently infected patient treated w REGN-COV2. Since we posted pre-print, other studies have also reported viral antigenic evolution in persistently infected patients. (8/n)
Second, describes single amino-acid mutation E406W that escapes both antibodies in REGN-COV2. We don't think E406W is clinical risk as requires multiple nucleotide changes to codon, but would be interesting to know biochemical mechanism (we hope others are working on this!) (9/n)
Finally, all of this work including the unpublished LY-CoV555 data above was led by @tylernstarr, with important contributions from @AllieGreaney, @AdamDingens, @Dr_MChoudhary, @DrJLi, Amin Addetia, and Will Hannon. (10/n)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bloom Lab

Bloom Lab Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jbloom_lab

13 Jan
In this short thread, I am going to plot some experimental data in a way that provides perspective on concerns that #SARSCoV2 mutation E484K will completely abolish immunity. (Thanks @profshanecrotty @apoorva_nyc for inspiring this post.) (1/n)
Last week, we posted a study describing how some #SARSCoV2 mutations, especially at site E484, reduce binding & neutralization (). This study (& similar ones by other) have drawn a lot of interest since E484K is in B.1.351 viral lineage. (2/n)
However, E484 mutations *reduced* neutralization, they did not ablate it. The plot below shows how E484 reduces neutralization titers for 16 sera. The dashed orange line shows titers against unmutated virus (measured by Pfizer) after 1 dose of BNTB162 vaccine. (3/n)
Read 11 tweets
5 Jan
Here's plot of how mutating RBD sites affects average serum binding (y-axis) vs frequency of mutations (x-axis). E484K in S African lineage most worrying. But others affect some serum to various degrees & no such thing as "average" human when it comes to serum specificity (13/n) Image
Importantly, we only looked at RBD muts, since majority of neut activity of most sera from RBD antibodies (2nd tweet of thread). But NTD muts also important; see @10queues @mccarthy_kr @GuptaR_lab @e_andreano @McLellan_Lab: biorxiv.org/content/10.110…, medrxiv.org/content/10.110… (14/n)
This relative role of RBD & NTD mutations consistent w historical evolution of common-cold CoV-229E, where mutations concentrated in receptor-binding loops of RBD, but also in parts of NTD. Here is plot of mutational variability in CoV-229E spike: (15/n)
Read 16 tweets
5 Jan
We mapped how all mutations to #SARSCoV2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) affect recognition by convalescent polyclonal human sera (biorxiv.org/content/10.110…).

Among implications: E484K (South African lineage) worrying for immune escape; RBD mutations in UK lineage less so (1/n).
We first determined where in #SARSCoV2 mutations most affect viral neutralization. @veeslerlab had reported RBD-binding antibodies responsible for most neut activity of human sera: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…. We validated w sera from @HelenChuMD's HAARVI cohort (below) (2/n)
Since RBD is main antigenic region (although NTD also important, see below), @AllieGreaney applied method she & @tylernstarr developed for monoclonal antibodies (sciencedirect.com/science/articl…) to map how all mutations to RBD affect binding by *polyclonal* human sera (3/n)
Read 28 tweets
18 Dec 20
In new work, we show a human coronavirus evolves to escape neutralization by antibody immunity (biorxiv.org/content/10.110…). Specifically, we studied the historical evolution of the common-cold CoV-229E to learn how #SARSCoV2 might evolve & if we might need to update vaccines. (1/n)
We first built a phylogenetic tree of CoV-229E evolution from 1984 to the present, and experimentally reconstructed the spike from viruses at 8 year intervals (1984, 1992, etc; see large black strain names in tree below). (2/n) Image
Next we tested how well human sera collected shortly after 1984 neutralized each viral spike. Below is serum from 26 yr old collected in 1985: it neutralizes 1984 virus well, but 10-fold less activity against 1992 virus & no activity against viruses after 2008. (3/n) Image
Read 17 tweets
2 Dec 20
After posting our pre-print mapping #SARS_CoV_2 mutations that escape Regeneron antibodies, been getting questions about implications for therapies/vaccines. I'd like to contextualize results. Summary is don't be alarmed, but pay attention to viral evolution. Long version: (1/n)
Antibody treatments consist of a single antibody (or in some cases a cocktail of a few) that bind viral spike. Since an antibody binds to one small patch of virus, typically a single mutation is sufficient to escape binding by an antibody. (2/n)
We know from other viruses this can happen. One of the best examples is Regeneron's trial of an antibody to treat RSV in infants (academic.oup.com/cid/advance-ar…). They ran an entire large / expensive clinical trial that failed. Retrospectively, the reason was obvious... (3/n)
Read 21 tweets
1 Dec 20
We mapped all #SARSCoV2 mutations escaping key antibodies used to treat #COVID19 (biorxiv.org/content/10.110…). Surprising observations: one amino-acid mutation escapes *both* antibodies in @Regeneron cocktail & escape mutations selected in infected patient treated w cocktail. (1/8)
Specifically, @tylernstarr, Allie Greaney, Amin Addetia, and @AdamDingens used a deep mutational scanning system to determine all mutations that escape antibodies in REGN-COV2 and LY-CoV016. You can view these complete escape maps here: jbloomlab.github.io/SARS-CoV-2-RBD… (2/8)
Surprisingly, they found a single amino-acid mutation (E406W) can escapes both antibodies in REGN-COV2 cocktail. E406W isn't in structural footprint of either antibody (see image), so mechanism is unclear. But it reduces cocktail neutralization by 100-fold. (3/8) Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!