- 252,803 addresses entitled to a claim
- Average airdrop amount is 593.3 UNI ($~6,800)
- Median is 400 UNI (~$4,600)
- Biggest claimer got 2,103,516 UNI (Over $20m)
- 55,224 addresses entitled to a claim
- Average airdrop amount is 1,629.76 1INCH (~$4,000)
- Median is 627.35 1INCH (~$1,570)
- Biggest claimer got 9,749,686 1INCH (~$25m)
- 32,262 addresses entitled to a claim
- Average airdrop amount is 64.31 BADGER (~$1,157)
- Median is 1.49 1INCH (~$26.85)
- Biggest claimer got 87,150 BADGER ($1.56m)
Seems like the Uniswap tweet of this thread got muted. Here it again:
- 252,803 addresses entitled to a claim
- Average airdrop amount is 593.3 coins ($~6,800)
- Median is 400 coins (~$4,600)
- Biggest claimer got 2,103,516 coins (Over $20m)
Assuming you were an "average" DeFi investor this past year and used only one address, you made nearly $20,000 in airdrops alone.
Not bad.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is pretty fascinating. @0x_b1 is attempting to purchase votes on a controversial Compound proposal.
DeFi is totally permissionless, so this is totally within what is "allowed."
For those that want more context on what exactly is going on here, here's a quick thread.
👇
In November, the price of DAI on Coinbase spiked to around $1.30.
As Compound uses Coinbase as a pair for its oracle, users borrowing DAI and with low health ratios (often leveraged COMP farmers) saw their positions go underwater.
In total, 85,220,000 DAI was repaid.
0xb1, in particular, was repaid 17,520,100 DAI.
The 8% liquidation penalty meant that 0xb1 "lost" around $1.4 million from their original deposit.
Prop 32 suggested that those affected by this liquidation event (some argue it was erroneous) should be compensated with COMP.