They pressed them on key points- should people get access to #BetterMasks?
Will the federal government help get these masks to people (N95s as an example)?
2/ Fauci responded saying "the most important thing is that you wear a mask"
Yes- we agree
A mask > no mask
But a high filtration mask > "a mask"
That last point is not really a "debate"- N95 masks are #bettermasks than cloth & surgical masks bc of fit & regulation on quality
3/ He then says we must "get everybody to wear a mask"
Unfortunately, that's not going to happen
Thankfully it doesn't need to!
Need enough people wearing masks in high risk transmission scenarios to stop cluster based spread
In these scenarios, high filtration masks key
4/ @CDCDirector also asked about this and her counterpoint was that N95s are "hard to tolerate" as she has worn one in clinical setting (as have I)
Thankfully, these don't need to be worn *at all times* -need these during indoor crowding (transit, grocery stores, frontline jobs)
5/ Also- for people that want the best protection they can get- they should be able to decide what level of breathability is tolerable for the activities they need to do
A bigger problem is getting the right fit- but even this isn't an unsolvable problem (see @FixTheMask & more)
6/ From a political standpoint, I can understand why it can be tough to acknowledge that #bettermasks will be a key part of this response, because once that is agreed upon, the government is partially responsible for getting these out to people & this can be complicated
7/ Alongside vaccine rollouts, operationalizing rapid tests, navigating stay-at-home orders & public restrictions, amplifying contact tracing programs, building better isolation options etc- #bettermasks is one more thing to do & I respect that is hard
8/ But remember- #bettermasks are key as the virus continues to evolve w/ already more transmissible variants circulating; they are meant to be one more tool in our response, not a silver bullet by any means.
I have immense respect for CDC & their work. More to come. #covid19
9/ @RanuDhillon@sri_srikrishna and I have been pushing for these since last spring. It took quite a while for this idea to even make it into the public dialogue at all. So it isn't surprising that it is met w/ some resistance now
If any single intervention worked *perfectly*, it could feasibly stop the epidemic- whether test/trace/isolate; fully supported lockdowns until transmission is dead; 100% usage of high-filtration masks at all transmission points; 100% vaccination
Real world doesn't work that way
2/ Instead, we are trying to do a bit of everything. That can work, but it won't if everything is done below standard, which at times it has
This is why trying to improve every intervention we have is critical
More testing
Faster tracing
Safer isolating
Better masking
Vaccines
3/ Sometimes, it feels like new ideas to get us *better* are shot down bc not *perfect*- like #BetterMasks recently; response from @CDCDirector was that they are hard to breathe through- sure, but that doesn't mean they aren't needed, or that they won't help.
Short thread 1/ As much as we have been tweeting lately about #BetterMasks, & as much as wearing masks that offer higher source control & personal protection could quickly paralyze #covid19 transmission- even these are but one more tool in our playbook; they are not the only one.
2/ With that being said, the responses to our push for #BetterMasks from Drs. Fauci & Walensky last night on #CNNTownHall were frustrating- essentially "a mask is better than no mask" & "N95s are hard to tolerate for long periods of time"
3/ To bring more nuance here, I have said many times this would not be as simple as "mass produce N95s"- you still need to make sure the fit is correct & that people are using them consistently during high transmission risk situations both outside AND sometimes inside the house
1/ One point of resistance from some is that we don't "need" #BetterMasks for the general public
Yet we still have people saying they took "all precautions" & got infected (while wearing a cloth or surgical mask)- many have reached out to me w/ this story washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/0…
2/ @RanuDhillon & I wrote this WaPo piece earlier in the epidemic to highlight that we still do not have a solid grasp on relative contributions of various modes of transmission (think droplets v aerosols as one over-simplified version of this)
3/ Part of the issue is that we have been falling behind on contact tracing since the very beginning of the epidemic & still are.
Moreover, if tracing is only looking for transmission within 6 feet/ 15 minutes, that is what it will find #covid19
"France has issued a decree banning certain homemade masks from being worn in public, saying they do not offer sufficient protection from the newer, more contagious #Covid19 variants."
2/ "Last Friday, two associations – one of doctors & a second of victims of Covid-19 – lodged an official demand to the state council demanding the wearing of FFP2 masks be made obligatory in public transport, shops & universities. The council will consider the demand this week"
3/ Have spoken w/ colleagues about this point that is being pushed saying that cloth masks don't protect as well "against the new variants"
Even these variants travel the same way- droplets & aerosols- so the equation is still the same as before- need to block both.
"As a whistle-blower report would later reveal, in January [2020], Department of Health and Human Services officials effectively dismissed an offer from one of America’s few remaining N95 manufacturers, Prestige Ameritech, to expand its production lines"
2/ "Steve Francis, a special agent in an investigatory division of the D.H.S., told me that the illicit P.P.E. market was so profitable that some transnational criminal organizations turned from smuggling humans and narcotics to moving masks."
3/ "The mayor of Los Angeles described cutting a check for a shipment of masks, only to have FEMA swoop in at the last moment. The governor of Montana complained on a conference call to President Trump that his state lost 4 or 5 orders in the previous week to federal agencies"
1/ So #LACounty is resuming outdoor dining after #COVID19 stay-at-home order is canceled-- this article quotes California health experts who are concerned that people need to remain vigilant.
It's strange that **outdoor dining** was a target though...
2/ As many of us have said, a key to controlling transmission is for people to avoid high risk situations.
Most if not all of these are *indoors*
If safer outdoor options are shut down, people are likely to migrate indoors where socialization isn't regulated
3/ California has the benefit of tolerable outdoor weather year round
The game plan here should have been to convince people to modify activities in a way that mitigates risk but gives them safer options to continue life.