2/ "He was the first to show how human activities damage the ozone layer. This knowledge ... was the basis for the worldwide ban on ozone-depleting substances – a hitherto unique example of how Nobel Prize-winning basic research can directly lead to a global political decision.”
3/ “Paul Crutzen was also a pioneer of the sciences focusing on the impact of human civilization on the environment, whether through his findings on the destruction of the ozone layer or through his later scientific work on human-made climate change." nobelprize.org/prizes/chemist…
4/ So critical!🙏
"discovered [atm. effects from] nuclear war could lead to a 'nuclear winter' resulting in a dramatic decline of the Earth’s habitability. His findings were essential contributions to the global ... achievements in nuclear disarmament." researchgate.net/publication/23…
5/ "Paul J. Crutzen coined the term #Anthropocene, which he used to describe the current era in which human activity is shaping our planet through the profound influence on global atmospheric, biological, and geological processes." e360.yale.edu/features/livin…
6/ "He commented on the scientific and social debates that followed his proposal on the concept of the Anthropocene: 'I see the debate as an opportunity to achieve the ecological reorientation that is urgently needed.'" link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2…
7/ He was even critical to the inception of early #openaccess journal @EGU_ACP
"His limitless scientific curiosity, creative ideas and his charismatic personality left their mark not only on me and our institution but on many generations of scientists” said Prof. Jos. Lelieveld.
8/ And more than all of these, he was a wonderful person. He was obviously brilliant & creative, but also curious & kind. I am personally grateful for my intersections with him while in Germany & mourn the loss Paul Crutzen's passing will mean for both our planet & civilization.
9/ Many tributes will surely roll in over coming days. Here is one taste of who Prof. Crutzen was, through the experience of a (then) young PhD student, now Prof. @ManabuShiraiwa. #chemtwitter#atmoschem
Study showing nosocomial (in hospital) transmission of COVID to HCWs despite surgical masks & distancing.
Important b/c: 1) Virus aerosolized w/o AGPs; only possible if airborne 2) Surgical masks insufficient (weak filtration; bad leakage)
via @CPita3 1/x academic.oup.com/ofid/advance-a…
2/ Conclusions of the study are anecdotal, but they are important b/c they add further direct support to a mountain of diverse evidence suggesting #COVIDisAirborne, though not treated so by #WHO and others.
3/ One key, practical take-away: upgrade your #mask quality (#N95, when possible) and always make sure it fits snugly all around to reduce air/virus leakage & transmission risk.
3/ Much focus on importance of a #multidisciplinary approach. A few interesting quotes:
"The evidence is clear that SARS-COV-2 is airborne, yet guidelines in many countries do not yet reflect this, thus hampering the ability to control the spread and endangering health workers."
1/2 @DrLaPook on the importance of quality face coverings (i.e. N95s or even multiple mask layers), esp. as worrying COVID variants rise (via @linseymarr).
But wrt to multiple #mask layers; mask FIT and overall BREATHABILITY also critical, because ... cbs.com/shows/cbs_even…
2/2 ... If it's hard to breath through a #mask, it is too restrictive/thick. Air (& aerosol) will always escape mask. If air exits via gaps rather than THROUGH layer(s), mask is ineffective!
E.g. watch where/how aerosol escapes this poorly-fitting mask
3/2 (bonus) Since mask fit is so so important (even for N95s), there are various strategies to help improve air flow *through* the mask layers & improve fit. This preprint paper shows improvement in mask filtration efficiency by adding a mask brace/fitter.
Important new preprint from Lednicky et al. on #aerosol transmission of COVID
*Aerosol <0.25 - 10 μm collected in car driven by COVID-patient w/ mild symptoms
*Viable virus only detected in airborne particles in size range 0.25 – 0.5 μm
Paper shows: "the potential risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission by minimally symptomatic persons in the closed space inside of a car (w/ closed windows & air conditioning running), & suggest that a substantial component of that risk is via aerosolized virus." medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
This 👇 earlier paper by the same Lednicky et al. (published Sept. 2020) showed viable (infectious) SARS-CoV-2 was present in aerosols within the hospital room of COVID-19 patients.
1/ Adding #ventilation helps reduce (but not remove!) aerosols & risk from COVID. One simple measure of ventilation is to keep #CO2 sufficiently low. Simple CO2 sensors can be <$150 and are easy to take with you.
2/ The idea is that indoor #CO2 comes primarily from people breathing out; but breathing also produces potentially infectious aerosols. So keeping #CO2 levels <800 ppm (or <600 ppm) means air is likely refreshed rapidly enough to keep aerosol risk low.
3/ There are lots of good resources & articles on improving #ventilation & for using #CO2 monitors for rough checks. This article by @B_resnick from months ago is worth a read as a broad overview on various topics related to air safety wrt COVID/aerosols. vox.com/science-and-he…