For my chief year grand rounds presentation, a mentor suggested that I use it as an opportunity to share my experience going through surgery training and having children. He suggested I share both the good the bad.
I loved this idea. It felt like we would be doing an M&M conference on our lived experiences as humans going through professional and personal challenges. I liked the idea that what was seen as a “problem” (pregnant surgery resident)...
became an opportunity for us to change our culture to be more inclusive. I wanted to include the fact that we were able to increase awareness of surgery boards accommods for pregnancy during training among our residents, and as a result more women were considering fam planning.
I also wanted to share the layers that intersectionality added to this already difficult experience.
This is why I love surgery, I thought. We can focus on a problem with objectivity and learn from it. That is what we do with our own clinical complications after all, right?
Needless to say, I was very excited about this presentation ...
That is until I was told that it would have to be reviewed and approved by the leadership.
My lived experiences would have to be “approved” by leadership (who by the way disapproved of my choices)....
My experience with every -ism in the book would have to be verified and approved by leadership who turned a blind eye to them for years...
And that is when I realized that the objectivity of surgery, the commitment to continuous improvement and growth is only applied selectively.
The problem solving strategies we rely on to save lives are put to the wayside when the problems concern tearing down racist structures.
Academia would rather keep its head in the sand and remain comfortable with this racist structure and power dynamics.
This doesn’t work for the rest of us. And because of that, Black and people of color trainees and physicians will continue to be driven out.
When we say minoritized and racialized people in medicine, regardless of position, are afraid to speak up because of #retaliation,
👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾 is what we mean.
Academia will destroy someone’s career and livelihood before they even think about becoming introspective or take any responsibility for their bias and racism.
Dr. @ayshakhoury does not deserve this. Her students don’t deserve to lose their teacher. And her community doesn’t deserve losing a good physician.
I got a call from one of our NPs that a neurosurgeon was berating him and the icu nurses about why his postop patient was in the icu. He brought one to tears and was yelling at the charge as well. So I called.
Nsg: Who the hell transferred my postop pt to the ICU?
Me: I did.
Nsg: Who gave you permission to transfer my patient?
Me: I’m the admitting physician. You’re a consultant. Are you aware of their other injuries?
Nsg: Listen, hun, I don’t know who you think you are but...
Me: First, don’t call me hun. Second, it’s Dr. Hussein
The story of two attendings. One we’ll call Toxic and the other Nice.
Toxic is your typical surgery bro with a god complex.
Nice is a good surgeon and a patient teacher.
I was on call with Nice when Toxic came to sign out to us on the patient he just operated on. He shared his plans and some labs to follow up on.
I asked if the labs had already been ordered or if I needed to order them.
Things went off the rails quickly. This was routine for him to go off for random reasons. And it didn’t help that he and I never got along for some reason.
Does it have to take a national movement against racism for the discrimination BIPOC women face in medicine to be taken seriously?
Does it have to take a national movement for “all these disparities women face in the workplace are worse for intersectional women” to move from a one-liner in #DEI work to the forefront and for #SystemicRacism to be relevant in the women in medicine movement?
When Black women spoke up about the discrimination we face and asked for allies to hold systems and institutions accountable, why is our go to answer “academia takes time?”