The trade related chapters of CETA were ratified by the European Parliament in 2017.
The investment chapter of CETA [allowing companies to sue countries] will only come into effect if the agreement is ratified by all 27 EU member states - including Ireland.
The ratification of CETA (i.e. the investment chapters of the agreement) could enable corporations to try to sue governments under a special "Investor Court System" (ICS) - a mechanism that would bypass our own domestic and EU Courts.
Canadian companies, or companies with 🇨🇦 subsidiaries (i.e. *many* US companies), could try to sue 🇮🇪 through CETA's ICS mechanism for changes in our housing, health, labour, environmental & climate legislation - on the grounds that it might impact their future profits.
Prof. John Sweeney explains that the threat of legal action alone leads to "Regulatory Chill."
"Fear of such claims arising would act to inhibit the state from imposing what citizens might consider appropriate future regulatory mechanisms in key areas."
In other words, if CETA were ratified, the Irish Government might not pass progressive legislation on climate change, workers' rights, health care or social protection for fear of being sued.
What might this mean in practice?
#Housing: As noted in @sli_eile_ webinar, 🇮🇪's biggest landlord is 🇨🇦 company, "Irish Residential Properties Reit" (IRES)
If 🇮🇪 were to enact legislation which could impact landlords (eg laws to prevent rent ⬆️), IRES could try to sue 🇮🇪 for compensation
#Health: Colombia declared a $$ cancer drug a "medicine of public interest" in an effort to⬇️costs of the💊
Novartis, who held a monopoly over the💊 threatened to sue 🇨🇴 in an arbitration investment tribunal.
#WorkersRights: French multinational, Veolia, claimed $174 million in compensation against Egypt through an Investor State Dispute settlement when Egypt raised its minimum wage.
#Environment: many Canadian companies are already mining or prospecting for minerals in Connemara and Co. Clare.
Mining has devastating impacts on wildlife & public health. If CETA is ratified, the Irish govt may not intervene for fear of an expensive lawsuit.
#ClimateChange: in Ireland, the smoky coal ban and the repurposing of the oil levy to fund climate action have both been significantly delayed as a result of legal threats.
Is CETA's Investor Court System really something to worry about?
YES!
As of 2018, govts had paid out $88 billion to corporations resulting from investor court rulings. 10isdsstories.org/isds-primer/
Can governments sue corporations through CETA's Investor Court System?
NO!
ICS is a one-way judicial system that could enable companies to try to pursue lawsuits against states to protect their profits.
States cannot hold companies accountable through these courts.
Is Ireland obliged to ratify CETA?
NO!
While in opposition @EamonRyan said CETA would "give big business power over governments and our courts and that the deal offers no certainty of protection of environmental rights."
Since entering govt, @EamonRyan has changed his position, citing [developments such as] the opinion of the Court of Justice of the EU & CETA's nod to the Paris Agreement. He said he would be urging @greenparty_ie TDs & members to change their minds.
There is no compelling argument to ratify CETA. We call upon the Irish Government - @FineGael@fiannafailparty - but especially the @greenparty_ie who campaigned so passionately against CETA while in opposition: #stopCETA!!
Full list of sources & more info at the link in bio.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ A 2050 decarbonisation target is far too late for 🇮🇪 on the basis of equity.
According to UNEP’s 2016 emissions gap report, all scenarios remaining below +1.5°C require global emissions to peak before 2020. They haven’t peaked, so we need to act *faster* after 2020.
2/ Setting 2050 as our target date means that having already contributed disproportionately to the climate crisis, 🇮🇪 will consume more than its fair share of the remaining “forever” global carbon budget for 1.5°C. On the basis of equity we need to act much faster than 2050!
So, today we're heading to the Supreme Court to demand protection of citizens' Constitutional and human rights.
Our case is one of only a handful of climate cases in the WORLD to make it to the SC ⚖🏛
But what is the relevance of our case in our current political context?
🧵
Our case is significant regardless of what any (potential) new coalition govt plans to do. We're seeking to establish that climate policy must be consistent with 🇮🇪's legal obligations to protect human rights, incl. rights under the Constitution & EU Convention on Human Rights.
Climate Case Ireland is seeking to establish recognition of a *legal limit* to the government’s discretion in making (and indeed delaying) urgently needed climate policy.
1/ Extreme civilisation, late-stage capitalism, whatever you want to call it: this thread👇🏼 is about THE. LEAST. SUSTAINABLE. THING. EVER! And it’s Irish...
As the Joint Committee on Climate begins its vital work, we need to talk about the Irish Farmers’ Association (IFA) and the Farmers Journal.
Other than membership, where do you think the IFA gets its €€€ in the millions?
2/ From the “European Involvement Fund” levy. What’s that, an EU tax? No, despite the name. Irish farmers pay this ‘levy’ on an *opt-out* basis on the sale of livestock, milk & other produce @ €1.50 for every €1,000 sold. Goes mostly to the IFA but also to @icmsa & others.
3/ The levy generated a whopping €4.16m for the IFA in 2016 (1/3 to 1/2 of its income). Is it any wonder they treat the senior lads so well, says you.