How high will bond yields rise?

2.0%? 3.0%?

This isn't about yield curve control.

This is about when higher yields start to change the vector or direction of economic growth.

Some food for thought...

(Thread)

1/
Over the summer (July) we started to note a rise in cyclical inflation indicators and noted it was prudent to hedge a rise in inflation.

My process separates long-term (secular) trends and multi-quarter/year (cyclical) trends.

We have a cyclical upturn on our hands.

2/
This is not new or unique.

In fact, since 2010, we have had four major cyclical upturns in economic growth.

This is the fifth.

I don't use any technical analysis (not in my process).

However, we can use the last four cyclical upturns for clues.

3/
As the economy gets extremely overindebted, higher interest rates across anywhere on the curve starts to bite, and the impact happens quicker and quicker at higher levels of debt.

4/
In the prior four cyclical upturns, 30YR bond yields rose:

125bps

151bps

101bps

135bps

AVG: ~128bps

5/
In October, this reality was noted to clients when 30YR rates were 1.50%.

The implication was that an "average" cyclical upturn could see bond yields rise about 130bps from the low of 1.0%, placing 30YR rates around 2.30%.

6/
This is not a point estimate, nor a call for a reversal of bond yields exactly at 2.30%.

Rather, this is just some context around how much rates increased in past upturns and how in an indebted economy, 100-150bps really impacts growth.

7/
For short-term cyclical trends in growth/inflation, I use a host of leading indicators.

Those indicators are still pointing higher which means to me that this reflationary upturn is not dead yet.

8/
This upturn could be longer or shorter than average - we will have to watch the indicators.

But, a rise to 2.30% on the 30YR would place this rise in bond yields at just about "average" based on the last four cyclical upturns in economic growth.

9/
We have more debt and more problems, so this rise could be less than average.

This is a post-recessionary rebound so the rise could be more than average.

10/
Most important is the cyclical direction of leading indicators (higher), but this is just some context around when rates may start to bite.

At 1.95% today on 30s, it is well within reason to see rates back at 2.30% should this upturn continue.

11/
If the leads turn lower - bond yields should start coming down.

TLDR: we are in an upturn so the bias for rates is higher. Around 2.30% on 30s is when rates should start to slow economic growth based on the average of the last four cyclical upturns.

(end)

12/12

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eric Basmajian

Eric Basmajian Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EPBResearch

10 Feb
Quick thread on the recent CPI report

There is a battle between long-term (secular) disinflation and a short-term cyclical rise in industrial-based inflation

The market is desperately hoping the cyclical inflation wins, and it still has the edge for now, but not this month

1/
⚠️ Warning ⚠️

In the next few months, the base effect will boost inflation big time and it will be consistent with the cyclical upturn in inflation, but the CPI growth will fade after the easiest comp.

That aside...

2/
Headline CPI edged slightly higher in year over year growth rate terms but remains stubbornly low, and way too low based on breakeven rates.

See recent thread on DKW Model:

3/ Image
Read 13 tweets
10 Feb
What factors are driving Treasury yields higher?

Is it inflation, growth, or something else?

While the DKW model is imperfect, it provides some context around which factors are driving Treasury rates higher.

The DKW model was recently updated for EoM January.

(Thread)

1/
To start, as I have commented many times in the past, the economy is in a clear cyclical upturn, so we should expect the vector or direction in both growth expectations and inflation expectations to move higher.

2/
However, embedded within a 10-year rate is 10-year assumptions, not easily moved like Y/Y CPI or growth. These are long-term, slow-moving averages.

3/
Read 12 tweets
28 Jan
Quick Breakdown of the GDP Report:

Nominal GDP growth increased to -1.2% on a year over year basis.

This increase in nominal growth is clearly very expected.

1/
Real GDP growth increased just a touch, from -2.85% to -2.45% on a year over year basis.

The gains are predictably slowing (Zarnowitz Rule) but the y/y growth will look huge in Q2 due to the base.

2/
Consumption as a % of GDP actually declined in Q4.

Consumption fell to 67% of total GDP, basically flat since the 2008 crisis.

3/
Read 13 tweets
13 Jan
I have been discussing the trends in inflation lately.

Today's report showed more of the same.

Inflation is coming from the industrial upturn, concentrated in the goods sector while the services sector is showing declining rates of inflation.

1/
Headline inflation ticked up slightly and is mostly a balancing act between rising goods inflation and falling services inflation.

2/
Goods inflation continues to rise, jumping to nearly 4% on a year over year basis.

Goods inflation (and industrial commodities) are rising due to manufacturing backlogs caused by shutdowns and the overall shift to at-home goods consumption and away from services consumption.

3/
Read 5 tweets
12 Jan
Private inventories to GDP are rock bottom

This is because of a sudden & forced shift to at home goods consumption that caught everyone offsides

The restocking upturn is set to continue

Once the industrial upturn runs it's course, we'll be back to the same old trends

1/
There's been a secular trend of services consumption growing faster than goods consumption.

2/
That trend shifted suddenly but is unlikely to last for years after the economy re-opens. This shift is likely temporary and a result of forced lockdowns, fear of consumer-facing businesses, etc.

3/
Read 7 tweets
11 Jan
It is difficult to change a 10-year trend.

Long-term expectations do not change as frequently as daily market fluctuations would make it seem.

A quick update on Treasury rates through the lens of the DKW model

*As of Dec. 31*

1/
In previous threads, I made the distinction between long-term secular trends in growth and inflation and shorter-term (2-6 quarters) trends in nGDP growth



2/
Right now, the long-term trends are unaltered because long-term trends just don't change that fast but we have a very strong cyclical upturn in the economy, centered primarily on the shift to goods consumption bolstering the manufacturing sector and industrial commodities.

3/
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!