1/ HAPPY #TESLA DAY, #bitcoin! Two things in the announcement caught my eye🧐& are worth pondering.🤔
* the $1.5bn #bitcoin purchase was 7.7% of @Tesla's $19.4bn of cash. Why only 7.7%?
* Tesla plans to accept bitcoin as payment but "may or may not liquidate upon receipt." Why?
2/ Why only 7.7% of cash? Well, @Tesla confirmed it's using indefinite intangible accounting, which is UGLY treatment (lower of cost or market+risk of impairment charges). We bitcoiners must work to get bitcoin acctg fixed. It's prob why Square only put 2% of its cash into #BTC.
3/ What gives? "Impairment charge"=☠️. Cos hate them bc they cause sudden hits to earnings. I'd guess Tesla & Square ran scenario analyses to see how big an impairment charge they cld tolerate in a #bitcoin bear mkt, & sized their investment based partly on that (+other factors).
4/ I'd guess they would've bought more #bitcoin if GAAP acctg weren't so ugly. Really we bitcoiners need to work w/ #FASB to fix this. Weird--if a co. invests in a bitcoin fund, value gets marked up or down. But if it buys bitcoin directly, value only marked down (until sold).🤦♀️
5/ But the "we may liquidate upon receipt" statement is even more interesting. I've been worried for a long time that a lien mess would eventually hit #bitcoin & this could be the start of it. @TraceMayer anticipated it & that's why #Wyoming law addressed it--to get ahead of it.
6/ What do I mean by "lien mess"? Follow me here. Most companies have loans from banks to help them manage cash flow. These loans give banks a 1st-priority lien on inventory & the "proceeds" from selling their goods. Yep, @Tesla has a standard one of these sec.gov/Archives/edgar…
7/ So, what does this mean? If @Tesla sells a car for #bitcoin, its bank has a first-priority lien on that bitcoin because that bitcoin is "proceeds." It's known as an "all-assets lien." It's VERY common & you'll find it in pretty much every bank loan pertaining to inventory.
8/ Why does a bitcoiner care? Well, let's consider the unlikely scenario that Tesla (or any other co. that sells goods for #bitcoin) someday goes bust. The bank *MUST* go after that #bitcoin & will sue whoever the co. sold it to, to enforce its *VALID* lien on that #bitcoin.
9/ Sounds scary & thankfully it's unlikely to affect you. But as #bitcoin's price climbs + more cos accept #BTC as payment for goods that are subject to such lien, we're going to start seeing disputes over this. Trace anticipated this eventual prob--#Wyoming got ahead of it. How?
10/ Wyoming law gives #bitcoin same treatment as money under commercial law ("supernegotiability"--innocent party "takes free" of such adverse claims as long as they weren't colluding to defraud) + has a 2-yr lien cleansing provision as long as the BTC is "located" in #Wyoming.🤠
11/ How do you "locate" a digital asset in #Wyoming? You could reside here. Or keep your private keys here. Or you use a #Wyoming#SPDI bank to custody them. Or you might use a #Wyoming legal entity to own your #bitcoin. You need legal advice on this. You don't need to live here.
12/ Other states have proposed the same (fair) treatment for #bitcoin--Nebraska, So.Dakota & Kentucky may enact Wyoming's laws this year & @FrancisSuarez is working to get 'em enacted in Florida. The Uniform Law Commission is working on it too, but it's a slow process.
13/ I'm optimistic that this stuff--the ugly accounting treatment for #bitcoin & the risk that bitcoin could get caught up in a lien mess--will eventually get fixed. We've gotta keep working on it though!
Let's get going! 🤠👊
14/ P.S. -- if you want a roadmap for how to get this fixed in your home state, just copy #Wyoming's UCC addendum. It has stood up well so far & the edge case critiques of it are being addressed. It's best for states (& for #bitcoin) to get ahead of the potential lien mess now!!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ FASCINATING few weeks for social media—the migrations away from big platforms by fed-up users has been MASSIVE. Users proved we’re MUCH more powerful in ecosystems than many ppl thought (vaguely reminiscent of #UASF event in #bitcoin).
The b4 vs after venn diagram of the...
2/ ...social platforms & news sources I use has surprisingly little overlap. I’m trying many new platforms (today I happened upon a great Clubhouse chat room on #crypto law w/ @propelforward. Clubhouse is gonna disrupt podcasts in a v big way, IMHO). Follow me if you’re there! 🤠
3/ I don’t plan to leave @Twitter but I’m not wedded to it either. None of us should be! When 40m people sign up for one new platform & 25m for another in just days, you know something big is afoot.
1/ HEY PEEPS—lots of folks asking abt @Anchorage OCC trust charter—again, congrats to Anchorage!💪👏 But OCC trust charter is narrower than #Wyoming SPDI charter. OCC trust cos can’t take deposits or directly access the Fed’s pymt system. Here’s the thread I promised. 👇
2/ Key=there’s a pecking order among types of bank charters. At the top of food chain are the mega-banks that can fund US govt. Next=banks ("depository institutions") that have direct access to the Fed’s payment system. Below them are banks & trust cos that don't have such access
3/ OCC trust cos are in the 3rd category but #Wyoming SPDIs rank above them, in the 2nd. To be eligible for direct pymt system access at Fed, the bank must be a "depository institution" (as defined in 12USC461). Wyoming SPDIs are depository institutions, but OCC trust cos aren’t.
WOW--#crypto lawyers will be EVEN BUSIER over the break (as if the Mnuchin rule, SEC v Ripple & CSBS v OCC lawsuits weren't enough...). There are weeks when decades happen, as they way. For crypto law, this is one of those weeks
2/ PS--I suspect both SEC moves this week are tied to @coinbase's IPO filing, which will force the open questions re: which cryptos are securities to be answered in 2021. As mentioned earlier, IMHO the SEC will be one of (if not *THE*) most important players in US #crypto in 2021
2/ But lemme connect 3 dots abt how it relates to #crypto
* There's a SHORTAGE of collateral (T-bills, etc)--the stuff big dealer banks NEED in order to fund themselves. Facebook Libra/Diem could worsen that shortage a lot, so you can see why central bankers view it as a threat.
3/ The #repo mkt periodically has disruptions caused by collateral shortages/undercapitalization of the big dealer banks. @JeffSnider_AIP looks at March 2020 in this piece but many other examples exist, eg Lehman in 2008. When repo mkt seizes up, the probs ripple across fin mkts.
As #Ethereum works thru its #hardfork, worth asking these ?s abt your exchange/custodian:
* if it no longer supports the old chain, can it just break its contract w/ you?
* can it keep the forked coins or must it give them to you? #Wyoming law has consumer protections for this!🤠
It's situations like this that will REALLY set apart exchanges/custodians using #Wyoming law to govern their contracts w/ US customers. 🤠Non-Wyoming law intermediaries tend to have contracts that favor the intermediaries🙁, & courts tend to uphold them: coindesk.com/appeals-court-…
3/ One thing seems clear--there will be more litigation in the US for situations like this (bc there's more value involved now vs past). Also Cred bankruptcy, which is first substantial #crypto bankruptcy in US courts, has already attracted attn of consumer protection advocates
2/ Lack of clarity has kept the HUGE #RIA & asset mgr market out of #crypto but this should help. Sum:
* banks are #qualifiedcustodian by def'n, but
* state-chartered trust cos may not be
RIA must defend that a state trust co provides as much protection as a bank, broker, FCM.
3/ Consider how SEC frames the ?s:
* do state trust cos have "characteristics similar to" institutions "SEC has identified as QCs" (ie, state trust cos aren't in group SEC identifies as QCs)
* wld state trust co as QC add gaps/enhancements? (again the ? presumes they're not QCs)