I'm getting a lot of questions about the prayer before the #ImpeachmentTrial at the Senate. This #THREAD has your answers.
The prayer is given by Senate Chaplain Barry Black. Yes, the Senate has a chaplain. Yes, your tax dollars pay his salary. And the numbers are shocking:
From 2000-2015, Congress spent more than $10 million on prayers, the vast majority of which are to the Christian god (more than 96% of prayers in the House were Christian).
Do chaplains do other things? Sure. But they're paid to pray. The claim that they accommodate the religious freedom of Members of Congress may have made sense when DC was an unpopulated swamp...
...but not in an age where houses of worship are on every street corner in DC and when members can zoom with religious counselors of their choice back home or anywhere else. Religious consolation is easy to find.
They chaplains are paid to pray.
And they are paid an awful lot.
The House Chaplain makes $172,500 (2018)
The Senate Chaplain makes $160,787 (2018)
Now, my numbers are 4 years old, but we were paying $800K each year for prayers back in 2016 because the chaplains each has staffers. Five staffers plus two chaplains for 7 total. I believe that's changed somewhat.
And even with those fat salaries, the official chaplains let “guest chaplains” deliver many of the prayers—about 40% in the House. The House chaplains gave 1,341 invocations from 2000-2015, or about 84 invocations each year. Guest chaplains gave another 857 over that same span.
Can you imagine making $170,000 a year to work for about 3 minutes a day for 84 days?
I can't. But we are all paying for it. That's our tax dollars at work.
And one more thing before we get to the legal questions: nobody in Congress really listens to the prayer.
A few years back, I asked U.S. Rep. Mark Pocan how many members actually sit through the prayers. He said, "no one's in the room...it's pretty much in an empty room." Watch for yourself.
So we pay $800K each year for, at most, a couple of hundred prayers that nobody really pays attention to.
Sure, the chaplains do other things, but Members of Congress can get those services for free at any house of worship.
Yeah, you should be pissed.
So, here's the big question. How is this constitutional? How is this allowed?
Well, it's unconstitutional. But the Supreme Court said it was OK. Why? Because we've been doing it for a long time.
The argument from tradition is awful. If a practice can't stand on its merits, it should fall.
"We've always done it this way" is not a legal argument, it's an admission that you have none. Slavery. Segregation. The subjugation of women. Where would we be if tradition held sway?
The First Amendment says that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." And yet, Congress has established and funded two national preachers.
In that 1983 case, Justices Brennan and Thurgood Marshall said his stupidly unconstitutional:
"In sum, I have no doubt that, if any group of law students were asked to apply the principles of [the First Amendment legal test] to the question of legislative prayer, they would nearly unanimously find the practice to be unconstitutional."
This. Is. Easy.
One last thing...
What terrible calamities would befall Congress without the chaplains? If the court were to declare the positions unconstitutional, as is clearly required by the First Amendment, what would happen?
Nothing. We'd all be just fine.
Nobody attends the prayers anyway, but even if they did, even if prayer was crucial to some Member's daily routine, they could still pray. Nothing would stop them. But we don't need paid chaplains for a Senator to bow her head in prayer.
Steven Hotze is a #ChristianNationalist radio host/TX GOP bigwig. You'll remember him as the guy that asked Gov Abbott to issue "shoot to kill" for #BlackLivesMatter protesters this summer.
Glad to see so many people waking up to threat #ChristianNationalism poses to our republic and our pluralistic democracy.
If you've just recognized this existential threat, welcome to the fight. It's not over because Trump is on his way out the door. There's a lot left to do.
@kathsstewart's The Power Worshippers is a great look at the power players and monied interests that drive CN. She opened the back of the watch and showed us the interlocking gears. amazon.com/Power-Worshipp…
Check out @C_Stroop's writings on #ChristianNationalism. As an #exvangelical, she's got a valuable perspective and is especially erudite and observant when it comes to the authoritarianism inherent in CN.
The Supreme Court did not determine or declare that we're a Christian nation. It said so in dicta: an unimportant aside not relevant to the case's holding.
The case involved a nativist law similar to Trump's Muslim ban. Here's what happened:
Congress passed the Alien Contract Labor Law (or Foran Act) in 1885. It said businesses couldn't sponsor foreign laborers (have them immigrate and then work for the companies). It was an extension of the racist Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882.
The court ruled that the law did not prevent churches from contracting to bring pastors from other countries to minister to their congregation. That’s it. It was an issue of statutory interpretation.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is about to hear argument in a case that might weaponinze religious freedom. Not only could it make "because god" a license to discriminate, it might also give discriminating religious orgs a right to contract with the government to provide services.
This case is not about faith, but whether adhering one particular brand of conservative Christianity is right that Trump's all others, including the rights of other Americans. This is about codifying Christian privilege in the Constitution.
The goal is to rewrite or redefine the Constitution so that it creates two classes of people: Christians and everyone else. Or to be more accurate, the right kind of conservative Christian, and everyone else.
That absurd portrait is deeply problematic without the MAGA addition. Asked about the relationship between Christianity and white supremacy, Prof. @AntheaButler said, “It’s a huge relationship. Every time you see a white Jesus you see white supremacy.” religiondispatches.org/fundraising-fo…
Other entries for best Christian Nationalist photo of #Election2020 include
I'm getting tons of questions about what happens if Trump dies before the election? Or after? Is it Pence or can GOP just pick anyone they want? 25th Amendment? And every possible variation of these Qs and more. I'm a constitutional attorney and I'll answer them all now.
THREAD
These procedural questions are fascinating and the short answer is that there is not a lot of precedent for most of what people want to ask. There are so many variables, so many unknowns, and so much could change between now and the inauguration. So there's a lot we don't know.
But we know enough. We know that if Biden wins—and especially if he wins in a landslide—none of these questions matter.
So...that is the answer to everything. Stop fretting over hypotheticals and do something. Vote early. Donate. Volunteer.