It occurred because RH's risk management process nearly failed them. "Nearly failed" sounds damning, but realistically what happened was not modelable.
RH's massive success, to that point, laid the groundwork for the challenge.
5/n
In financial markets, un-modelable outcomes occur with disquieting frequency.
Practically speaking, 5 or 6 sigma events should "never" happen, yet we keep running into them.
That doesn't mean "abandon the models." It means the models should be an input, but not THE input.
6/n
RH's $GME et al problem was the confluence of a variety of seemingly uncorrelated factors becoming very correlated, breaking down other expected correlations.
Two evergreen solutions are to always *hold lots of extra capital* and allow for common sense adaptations.
💰💸🧠
7/n
For RH to bridge the time gap between "not having enough capital" & "having plenty of capital," RH needed to hit pause on a small list of securities. It literally could not afford for clients to add more of the same risk to its books.
I discussed this ad nauseum in my primer
8/n
RH had no desire for $GME et al's stock prices to go down (or up) - it simply needed clients to stop adding incremental GME risk until RH had the capital to support that risk.
Vlad and the RH team acted incredibly quickly.
Truly.
9/n
Think of what they accomplished in five days: 1) Worked with DTCC etc to manage down capital requirements; 2) Drew down LoC; 3) Implemented trading restrictions on its client base to buy time (which was needed to protect its clients; I know many people disagree with this);
10/n
4) Dealt with resultant blowback; 5) Processed record new customer *signups* throughout the crisis; 6) Raised $1 billion of capital in ONE DAY 7) Dealt with, and provided access to, a deluge of media inquiries; 8) Raised a further $2.5 billion in ONE WEEKEND;
11/n
9) Reinstated full trading within a few trading days; 10) God knows the behind-the-scenes work that RH has been doing over the past week; 11) Dramatically increased transparency; 12) Almost certainly unexpected challenges, like employee concerns, safety threats, etc.
☮️🕊️
12/n
13) Embraced a healthy conversation around PFOF and "zero commission" trading (my thoughts on Payment For Order Flow linked below).
Whew. 😓😰
This was a PhD level Crisis Management course, being forced on RobinHood in real-time.
..but the train wreck that is post-deal SPACs is epic.
Each day the SPAC machine issues 5-10 more, driving future shorting profits to the moon.
🤑🚀💥
1/n
Post-deal SPACs skew toward 𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜 company quality. The best analog is IPOs c1999.
With luck, SPAC-mania lasts for quite a while, REALLY stocking the pond.
We are going to witness Desperation Buying (TM) by sponsors, as they fight to deploy capital into shitcos.
2/n
Why Desperation Buying (TM)?
Sponsors either: get a deal approved & receive massive pay; or fail to get a deal & lose their sponsor equity, is a perverse incentive driving bad behavior.
It’s going to get MUCH worse, as this vintage matures.
🤮
It's pretty clear @jack is fired up about what's coming at Twitter. The rebuild of $TWTR's tech stack & ad server have increased speed to market with new features.
Jack all but promised that Twitter's ability to innovate and iterate has accelerated dramatically.
1/n
A few days ago, @kayvz hosted a Twitter Spaces event, where he was live testing the experience. Kayvon said many of the same things Jack did.
Below is a portion of my raw notes from Kayvon, if interested.
If the business of Twitter isn't your jam, no need to read on:
2/n
Kayvon runs Product at Twitter - the non-revenue side of Twitter, aka product development. He founded Periscope.
Recall: Spaces is Twitter's competitive response to Clubhouse. An audio hangout.
3/n
Those emergency investors will get a quick win, as RH likely IPOs later this year.
“[RH] told investors they still plan to take the company public sometime in the first half of the year...To do so, he will have to clear the high growth bar set by Wall St. investors.”
Summary for what’s coming:
“Buckle up” - we are in uncharted territory.
Quick Notes:
Hard to predict future when the background is so unusual. Very dif than c2000. SDtTouches on positioning, including $BTC
1/4
Druck is:
Short long-dated USTs
Long commodities
“Very very short dollar”
Asia is the “big big winner” - $SEA
Next 5 years, Asia better than US (due to fiscal/debt, current account surplus, etc.)
2/4
$BTC - could be both a mega-bubble & a store of value. I don’t believe or not believe. I own some, and have for a while. I’m also long commodities.
“Possible, perhaps even probable” that the extreme stimmy will be here as vaxes complete. Massive pent up demand will unlock.
3/4
“Many customers aren’t aware of the complicated machinery behind each trade... And regulators and industry watchdogs decide things like how much capital and collateral brokerages have to post.”
“Behind the scenes, Robinhood and other brokers were dealing with a jam in the machine that moves shares from sellers to buyers.”
“Because of a lag between when investors book new positions in a stock and when their cash is actually exchanged for securities, brokerages ...have to maintain deposit accounts at the clearing firms that help finalize trades.”