While looking at the verse counts reported in the headers of Arabe 5122 I ran into a headscratcher: Sūrat al-Sajdah (Q32) (called tanzīl al-Sajdah here) is marked here as having 52 (!) verses. Traditional counts either have 29 (Basran count) or 30, so what happened here? 
Let us first confirm that the manuscript does not have some kind of bizarre count. In between this Sūrah and the next, one encounters 2 10 verse markers and 3 5 verse markers. The actual count must therefore be more than 25 and less than 30 (so likely the Basran 29).
So what is going on? I started thinking: wait a minute, there is another Sūrah that historically is ALSO called al-Sajdah, or more specifically Ḥā-Mīm al-Sajdah, namely Fuṣṣilat (Q41). Could it be that our ornamenter got confused and mixed up the counts of the two Sajdahs?
The answer indeed appears to be yes. If we go over to Ḥā-Mīm al-Sajdah (which is indeed the name he gives it) and check its verse count we indeed find that it is 52 in the count of this manuscript! . So it indeed seems like they got their Sajdah's confused!
This perhaps reveals something about how the process of header ornamentation worked in the time of production (ca. mid 3rd c. AH). Did our scribe have a list of the Sūrah titles with their respective names and when they got to Sajdah their eye fell on the wrong one and copied it?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
