Nick Chong Profile picture
28 Feb, 15 tweets, 4 min read
Vitalik recently proposed the removal of the gas refund tied to 'SELFDESTRUCT' on Ethereum in the London upgrade.

This has seemingly lowered demand for gas, driving down prices to double-digit Gwei.

Let's explain what's going on and why this matters for gas tokens ($CHI, GST)👇
Each Ethereum transaction requires gas.

Generally, the more complex a transaction, the more gas the transaction consumes.

The gas is paired with your specified gas price to determine your transaction fee.

(Old MetaMask interface gang.)
The variable transaction fee model exists to ensure that miners are paid equally for any increases to Ethereum's state size.

The Ethereum state is the collection of information about contracts and addresses stored on nodes.
'SELFDESTRUCT' is an EVM-level opcode that sends a contract's balance to 'address'.

it's also unique in that executing the opcode to destroy contracts, the EVM actually refunds the user some gas to disincentivize state bloat, helping nodes manage state size.
That may not sound interesting, though a few clever devs realized you can transport cheap state space into the future by storing gas in contracts when gas prices are cheap.

By self-destructing elements and contracts when gas prices are high, you can get cheaper txes.

E.g.
Users take advantage of this arbitrage through gas tokens like $GST and $CHI, the latter of which was launched by the 1inch team.

These users can mint/buy gas tokens when gas is cheap, then burn them during times of volatility to realize gains.
This explains why many arbitrage transactions on Etherscan are preceded by many "Self Destruct Contract 0x..." prompts before you can view the details of the transaction.

Check out the image below.
This is quite clever.

When one is running arbitrage bots that spend thousands of dollars worth of ETH each day in transaction fees, the savings that one can achieve via using gas tokens add up over time.

But at what cost?
The existence of gas tokens, some argue, has contributed to considerable state bloat as 'meaningless' contracts are injected into Ethereum nodes when gas is seen as cheap.

By increasing state bloat, uncle rates may increase.
That's why... well, potentially why, Vitalik yesterday proposed to remove gas refunds for SELFDESTRUCT in the London upgrade.
CHI and GST have crashed in the wake of this move.

CHI is down 40% since the proposal.

GST is down 30% since the proposal.
Since the proposal, gas fees have dropped into the double-digit Gwei region for the first time in a few weeks, even months.

Because these coins may soon be rendered useless, it may be that there is no incentive for users to mint CHI or GST.
All this being said, we may have Vitalik to thank for the gas price finally returning to double-digit Gwei for the first time in what feels like forever.

Make the most of it while you can.

Harvest those farms. Unapprove sus contracts. :)
My focus when I started this thread was to illustrate how gas tokens work — it wasn't meant to be an extensive commentary on gas prices.

Though it's worth pointing out that along with maybe dropping the "floor" price as @lemiscate put it, it may decrease the # of arb events.
Gas tokens allow power users to realize large gas savings as illustrated earlier.

The removal of gas tokens may make certain arbitrage transactions *unprofitable*, meaning they may not be executed

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick Chong

Nick Chong Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @n2ckchong

26 Jan
When people ask me how they should learn about DeFi, I tell them to load up an account with some money and starting playing.

The reasons:

1. IMO, there is no better teacher than getting ur hands dirty
2. It pays to be a tester

A thread about the top airdrops of the past yr 👇
@UniswapProtocol (UNI):

- 252,803 addresses entitled to a claim
- Average airdrop amount is 593.3 UNI ($~6,800)
- Median is 400 UNI (~$4,600)
- Biggest claimer got 2,103,516 UNI (Over $20m)
@1inchExchange (1INCH):

- 55,224 addresses entitled to a claim
- Average airdrop amount is 1,629.76 1INCH (~$4,000)
- Median is 627.35 1INCH (~$1,570)
- Biggest claimer got 9,749,686 1INCH (~$25m)
Read 11 tweets
16 Jan
"But have we *earned* it?"

Vitalik famously posed this question in late 2017, when the crypto market cap first reached $500 billion.

We're past $1 trillion now. Let's see what has changed in crypto, especially in Ethereum and DeFi, since then.

A thread. 👇
2017 and 2018 were marked by vaporware.

Projects like Dentacoin, which promised, uhhh, great things but had little to show for it, garnered hundreds of millions in value.

Look where they are now.

Literal billions in market cap reduced to ashes. And that's good.
We've seen the capital allocated to these ghost projects seemingly flood toward quality.

Bitcoin dominance currently sits at 67% after bottoming at 33% in January 2018.

Ethereum dominance is also up from its lows.

Projects with big promises and no execution were flushed out.
Read 10 tweets
14 Jan
This is pretty fascinating. @0x_b1 is attempting to purchase votes on a controversial Compound proposal.

DeFi is totally permissionless, so this is totally within what is "allowed."

For those that want more context on what exactly is going on here, here's a quick thread.

👇 Image
In November, the price of DAI on Coinbase spiked to around $1.30.

As Compound uses Coinbase as a pair for its oracle, users borrowing DAI and with low health ratios (often leveraged COMP farmers) saw their positions go underwater.

In total, 85,220,000 DAI was repaid.
0xb1, in particular, was repaid 17,520,100 DAI.

The 8% liquidation penalty meant that 0xb1 "lost" around $1.4 million from their original deposit.

Prop 32 suggested that those affected by this liquidation event (some argue it was erroneous) should be compensated with COMP. Image
Read 6 tweets
3 Jan
By far, one of the most interesting Ethereum addresses I've seen is @0x_b1.

It's quite an interesting social experiment as well - a $300m whale starting a Twitter account for fun. Check their bio.

Let's break down the address and see what they are doing with their capital. 👇
0xb1 was created in mid-August, amid the food farming craze.

The address is active every day of the week and consistently makes transactions between 12:00 UTC and 6:00 UTC (sleeps between 7-11).

Likely U.S. based individual or team based on this history.

h/t @nansen_ai
0xb1 is a yield farming beast, to say the least.

It's industrial farming at its best - hundreds of transactions, swapping in and out of the latest yield farms on Ethereum.

Fun fact: the address has spent $111,000 in ether on transaction fees since its inception. Ow.
Read 17 tweets
30 Dec 20
Mithril Cash now has over $400 million in total value locked just three hours after its launch.

This includes over $200 million worth of stables and dozens of millions in YFI, CRV, and more.

Let's take a look at the second-order effects of the launch of this Basis Cash fork. 👇
Quick intro: Mithril Cash (MIC) is a Basis Cash fork that can be farmed by depositing stablecoins, some blue chips, MITH, or CREAM.

Reason for the latter two being, Mithril Cash is coming courtesy of @machibigbrother, founder of Mihril and Cream.
Disclaimer: While the contracts are similar to the Basis Cash contracts, Mithril Cash is unaudited.

Ape at your own risk.
Read 7 tweets
24 Dec 20
It appears that 1inch's governance token is right on the horizon.

1inch is the leading Ethereum-based decentralized exchange aggregator. Since its launch, it has done $7.6 billion in volume.

Here's a thread on what we know so far. 👇
First off, some context:

1inch is a decentralized exchange aggregator that routes liquidity through a number of exchanges to find the optimal prices.

This is often useful for larger traders, who may need to spread their buys or sells across exchanges to minimize slippage.
e.g. Here is Three Arrows swapping 4,000,000 USDT for 4,001,307 TUSD via 1inch v2 around four weeks ago.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!