This is really quite bizarre... Christian Porter says he was not given opportunity to respond to allegations before they were published (anonymously) by the ABC. But also he would not have read them anyway as it would have been “inappropriate”?? #auspoltheguardian.com/australia-news…
Christian Porter: “No journalist has put the detail of the allegations to me in a way that would allow seeking a response, not ever.” What does this statement even mean? It does not make sense. #auspol
He said the same thing before Canberra Bubble episode. But @Milliganreports says: “We gave those ministers...two-and-a-half weeks’ notice of the story and … they didn’t answer any of our questions,” #auspol
You can’t just keep your head in the sand and pretend it’s all not happening and then accuse others of not putting the questions to you. #auspol
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“Internal research showed that swing voters soon tired of the Higgins story....After a few days, it morphed into frustration that Higgins had yet to go to the police.”
Was any “internal research” conducted into why rape victims don’t go to the police? What action have the police actually taken in relation to Higgins? Has the man been interviewed or charged? Is he even still in Australia? The public are currently in the dark on these questions.
#Accountability for conduct is not limited to the criminal jurisdiction “An inquiry may be able to interview other persons that were present. Mr Porter mentioned there were four of them [on the debating team] and that they may have gone out together that evening.”
“He holds the apex position for the legal profession and his conduct – and integrity – must be beyond approach.
“An independent inquiry would be able to look into whether or not he is a fit and proper person to hold the position of Attorney-General in the Cabinet”