If you’re not rethinking how your business model and company could be disrupted and made better by software products, you’re not truly doing a product “transformation”.

A thread on the power of #prodmgmt 👇 /1
Over the past 7 years I’ve worked with many large enterprises which are what I call “software enabled”. That means they don’t primarily sell software for revenue.

Banks, insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies, manufacturers, etc. /2
These companies typically were run on a traditional IT approach - the business tells tech what tools they need, and tech builds them. Tech is a Dev shop, a services org. Not strategic but reactive. /3
Flash forward 20 years and they usually have thousands of tools, no insights into how they have been used, and a massive amount of tech debt.

So they decide to “transform”. They start to adopt #agile teams, restructure, and create the product role. This is where I come in. /4
When I work with leadership to understand the outcomes of the product transformation I hear:

- streamline our products
- stop being reactive
- Lower cost of ownership
- better prioritization

Everything is cost related because IT is seen as a cost center. /5
So I ask them “if you really want to transform, how is this transformation going to disrupt your business?”

They’ll look confused. But we’re just making a new product portfolio? We’re streamlining. We are making things better for our business customers. /6
While that’s a fine way to optimize your tech teams, it’s not a true transformation.

The reason older enterprises get disrupted is because they don’t see software as a strategic lever to further or disrupt their business model. /7
They want to be more strategic with their software, but they are worried. “We can’t just stop serving our business needs to build something radically different!” No one said you had to, hence a portfolio approach to building horizon 1-3 products. /8
But usually the problem is no one in leadership saw this as a true transformation. They claim they want the product teams to be strategic but there is usually no clear strategy anywhere, not even at the business, that software could align to. /9
And the software leaders and teams are worried that no one in the org will get behind the idea of these teams changing into a strategic player because that means saying no to some requests from the business. /10
So here’s my advice, so you at least level set before you get into planning on how to build #prodmgmt teams.

Ask yourself if you are transforming or streamlining. Is our goal to lower costs or transform our business? /11
There’s a very different approach to each of those. And very different outcomes.

One will give you cost savings, the other will help defend against competitors and grow your business.

Knowing where we are all going is key to undertaking any big product transformation. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Melissa Perri

Melissa Perri Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lissijean

5 Mar
Here’s my current saga with @HomeDepot and a story about their technology that is completely broken.

I returned $1000 worth of brick I bought online to the store. It said I could. The store accepted it but had to call homedepot.com to process the return. /1
This is an issue I run into all the time at @HomeDepot. They can never return the things I bought online without help but they still tell you to return to any store. So they accept the return, I leave. Here’s a pic of it sitting in the store. /2 Image
I call to make sure it got processed when I leave, and they said yeah everything fine.

I get a call a week later from their shipping company trying to schedule to have it picked up. I tell them it’s at the store they can’t. They said they’ll cancel the pickup.
Read 6 tweets
25 Aug 20
Calling your Product Managers something else may solve some issues in the short term, but it's just going to prevent you from hiring great people in the long term.

Anyone who says titles are not important is either trying to screw over someone or in a very privileged position.
Salary bands are determined by seniority. Salary bands are determined by job titles and positions.

This is from @BuiltInNewYork but I don't necessarily agree with these, just pointing out discrepancies in title. ImageImage
Director of Product vs VP of Product salaries are HUGE differences. ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
14 Jul 20
One big issue I see hold scaled companies back from doing great #prodmgmt is the lack of team work in middle management and exec layers. /1
We promote “scrum” teams and collaboration in an agile transformation, but we rarely talk about how middle managers and execs need to work too. /3
I worked with one company of 5000 people, about 50ish Director levels, and 10 VPs. It was a massive platform that was highly interconnects.

Every single leader set strategy themselves in a bubble. Then they started duplicating each other. /4
Read 10 tweets
13 Jul 20
I’ll caveat this for #prodmgmt.

If you are brand new to the field and the first PM, it’s hard to grow as fast compared to those who have someone to learn from.

Being a PM at a startup accelerated my career, but I had a great VP of Product to learn from.
If you do have a bit of experience in PM or someone to learn from there, I think startups are great. I had an opportunity to be employee 40ish at OpenSky or go to Amazon. I would have made a lot of money if I went to Amazon. My career would have never been the same.
Also I know there’s privilege in these choices, and I’ll say this- if you can negotiate a pay that’s comfortable, I’d recommend a startup. I had to do this to pass on Amazon (OS matched their base). I lost out on stock, but 10 years later my career has more than made up for it.
Read 4 tweets
10 Jul 20
Thread about product ethics.

I agree with Nate that we need WAY better education around finance and investing.

But I disagree that we can't blame Robinhood for investment mistakes, especially due to it's #UX. This is why /1
When things are broken, it gives companies an opportunity to solve the problem and exploit it for value. That's what Robinhood's doing. It's SMART. You find a problem, you solve it. Good business.

But we have to be careful not to exploit our customers as well. /2
When you specifically target unsavvy customers in a complex industry, the burden of education falls on you.

The risk to keep your customers safe falls on you.

This is where Robinhood went wrong. /3
Read 7 tweets
9 Jul 20
I don't know of a single Chief Product Officer who has a PhD. What is this trash advice, Cleverism? Image
Also, make sure you brush up on those Microsoft PPT skills if you want to be a CPO! You know, because that's SUCH a good investment in your time, and it's not like you could hire someone to help there. Image
Let's go back to 2005 and break out the Fireworks, shall we? That will REALLY get the board to invest in our roadmap. Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!