The new $LINK vault on @iearnfinance is a very welcome addition
Currently generates 70% APY
Zero impermanent loss risk
Lowers slippage of large LINK trades
Uses Chainlink oracles (Synthetix)
DeFi composability sandwich
A side bonus from this cross-asset swap liquidity pool design is that there's usually no impermanent loss, which happens when two assets in a pool diverge in price from one another
This makes it far less risky for liquidity providers, further lowering trade slippage
Token subsidies:
The other (majority) source of yield is from $CRV token subsidies given to liquidity providers
Essentially @CurveFinance pays users with $CRV tokens if they deposit their funds into their liquidity pools
You get more yield, they get more liquidity, win-win
An interesting way Curve designed their $CRV token subsidy is that there a base yield which can be boosted up to 2.5x
You boost your yield by locking up $CRV for a predefined amount of time (up to four years)
A 23% APY base rate can be boosted up to 58% APY with full boost
Normally as a user there's friction, you need to buy and lock up $CRV to boost your rewards while the majority of your yield (token subsidy) is in $CRV and needs to be regularly sold to $LINK to realize your gains
This takes time and costs a lot of gas, impractical for most
What the @iearnfinance crvLINK vault does is abstract both of these away
You don't need to lock up $CRV to boost yield because Yearn does this for you with their $yveCRV vault
You don't need to manually sell your $CRV for $LINK, Yearn does this for you, compounding returns
Your $CRV yield will be regularly liquidated over time into $LINK, which is then deposited back into the Curve pool and then into the Vault
It uses an economy of scale to socialize gas costs so your yield will almost always be higher than doing it on your own
For this service of yield automation, @iearnfinance (if the docs are up to date) is a 2/20 structure with a 2% a year management fee and 20% of the profits
Your yield should definitely be above 2% APY and the 20% of profits is worth it for the auto reinvestment of yield
This all being said, it doesn't come without risks
The Curve LINK pool is currently imbalanced with about 75% in LINK and 25% in $sLINK
This means $sLINK deposits earn a rebate, but $LINK deposits incur a slippage penalty, sometimes as high as 1% of your deposit
If you deposit LINK and later withdraw LINK when the pool is the same weighting, you actually don't lose anything, this is a form of Impermanent loss, which again only occurs if the prices diverge
Currently 1 $LINK = 0.98 $sLINK on this pool
So my recommendation is either depositing $sLINK or an equal balance of $sLINK and $LINK to prevent this slippage
With the current yield, the slippage is probably worth it anyways but that's up to you to decide
This process could be made even simpler with a wrapper contract which would allow you to just deposit $LINK one time, interacting the curve LINK pool and Yearn crvLINK vault for you
Just some potential UX and gas improvments for the future but not necessary by any means
Thank you to @AndreCronjeTech and the @iearnfinance dev team for creating the $LINK Curve pool and the $crvLINK Vault
Even though [REDACTED] is getting all the yield attention atm, that's short lived, Yearn is the gold standard long term DeFi yield solution
Good luck on your journey through DeFi my frens, avoid the rugpulls and any projects using centralized oracles
We're all gonna make it, might as well earn some yield in the meanwhile :)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ Off-Chain Reporting (OCR) is where the collection of oracle responses is done off-chain
A single transaction is submitted on-chain containing every oracle's individual observation and signature
Median value is determined on-chain because the observations are already sorted
3/ The reason data isn't medianized off-chain before delivery in the OCR model is because the individual ECDSA signatures can't be used without the original pre-medianized data to compare against
We need the cryptographic security of signatures or observations could be falsified
1/ While I believe #Ethereum is and will continue to be the dominant settlement layer for smart contracts, ultimately there is a way to bet on all of them
Every single blockchain in existence needs a decentralized oracle network to achieve its true value proposition
2/ Communication protocols have a natural network effect where the protocol with the most connections is the only solution used at scale (HTTPS)
#Chainlink is the universal communication standard for any and all blockchains to connect to any and all off-chain data resources
3/ Chainlink is not only a data delivery network but provides everything blockchains natively cannot
Price Feeds
Proof of Reserve
Verifiable randomness
Cross-chain interactions
Insurable events and IoT
Keeper transaction automation
Trust-minimized off-chain computation
Much more
2/ In 1997, computer scientist Nick Szabo (@NickSzabo4) described what he termed the “God Protocols"
This is an envisioned set of computer protocols that could facilitate the execution of an agreement between independent parties without any bias, error, or privacy concerns
3/ Through this, contract participants would consistently get what they are owed, when they are owed, and from whom they are owed, based on a totally objective view of reality
We believe that the combination of blockchains, smart contracts, and oracles are making this a reality
I think he's misconstruing what Sergey is saying about market coverage and not providing the full context on oracle security and the Uniswap TWAP
Thread for context below 👇
2/ Sergey was emphasizing the importance of proper market coverage
This does not mean taking a simple median or mean across exchanges
But instead aggregating data from all trading environments by taking into account liqudity, volume, time and other differences across exchanges
3/ Market coverage is important because it ensures price data reflects the true global market-wide price and not just that of one or a small number of exchanges
Chainlink covers this topic of market coverage and data quality extensively in this blog post blog.chain.link/the-importance…
I originally attempted to post this proposal on the Compound Governance Forum, however after over 22 hours, it is still "awaiting approval" from the Compound team
As a project based around “community driven governance,” I find it concerning I am being censored in this manner
For the sake of transparency and due the urgent nature of the matter, I am posting this proposal on my own Medium page so the $COMP community can decide for themselves if this is the path they want to take.