2/10 It's definitely the same photo, same hair same shirt, same everything - although the one on the right has been photoshopped with a smile and juicier beard...
3/10 However, the guy on the left is Dave Sharma, a very nice (I imagine) music teacher at Prelude Music Foundation, a setup designed to transform the lives of under-served children around Houston.
Hero.
4/10 Meanwhile, the guy on the right is Dr. Jhon Whiliams. @JhonWhiliams Beside the trailblazing spelling of Jhon Whiliams, which is unique, Jhon is a "Independent investigator, Journalist, Doctor on-call".
See look at his Twitter bio:
Also a hero?
5/10- Jhon is pretty well travelled, with US, UK , Italian and Saudi flags in his profile, and says he is American.
Global nomad, cultured.
...elegant
6/10 Despite this, Jhon really hates Iran and mullahs...and Shia muslims who he describes as 'humanoanimals' (charming for a doctor).
7/10 Despite his hatred for Iran, he is against hatred, which he knows will eat you up, make you blind, deaf and mute...
8/10 He loves Trump and the MEK propagandist @HeshmatAlavi
9/10 ....but hates Qatar, Turkey and Oman (devil in veil), and has made a handy list of the 'WORST' countries and 'BEST' countries in the Middle East. Saudi is the best of course, Iran is 'Hitler'. Qatar is a snake emoji.
10/10 So, sorry Dave, Jhon Whiliams is using your image to spread what appears to be pro-MEK and pro-regime change in Iran propaganda.
As a music teacher doing good work in Houston, you probably don't deserve this.
11- Update... @JhonWhiliams has updated his profile picture since this thread 😅
12- forgot to add that the account was probably appropriated between late 2017 and 2019. It was created in Dec 16 and was active until around Nov 2017, then all tweets were deleted until August 2019 when it started up again as a pro Saudi sock
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A few important notes on this great article. 1) I would caution there is a prevailing narrative about Saudi accounts, risks creating a straw man. 2) it is useful to make a distinction between bots and trolls as trolling is behavioural not computational; Trolls
could be hypernationalist real or paid real people attacking those who disagree 3) Saying someone is a real human risks conflating that with a troll whose *unknown* function might be to artificially generate support 5) As bots and trolls evolve it becomes more difficult to do
anomaly detection at scale and be sure of how many accounts have been missed in analysis 6) Twitter's own suspensions aren't a reliable or comprehensive barometer of what is and isn't definitely a bot - or troll 7) co-ordinated inauthentic behaviour includes trolls (real humans)
1/12"US Tech Companies like Twitter probably breathed a sigh of relief when Biden announced that he was not going to directly sanction Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman for ordering the murder of Jamal #Khashoggi." #JamalKhashoggi
2/12"...Not because Twitter bares any ill will towards murdered journalist Jamal Khashoggi, but because the Saudi Market and the cult of personality around the Crown Prince, in particular, offer a lucrative revenue stream for the US company"
3/12"Indeed, the amount of Saudi money in Silicon Valley has raised concerns that it will become a 'reputation-laundering machine for one of the least admirable regimes on earth'. And not without good reason, especially considering that MBS chairs the Public Investment Fund"
[Another thread on Saudi bots] 1/ On the day of the release of the CIA report onto #JamalKhashoggi 's killing. A number of hashtags seemingly designed to dilute criticism of MBS were trended, including the mispelled 'khasxoggi' and 3aaashogggi (عاشخجي), These trends were created
2/ by inauthentic networks amounting to thousands of accounts. The below graph shows approx 1,152 unique accounts all tweeting on the "عااااشقجي" hashtag (3aaashoggi). The fact they are individual and not forming complex networks indicates they are isolated accounts tweeting
3/ Of the 1152 accounts, 1147 (99%) used 'Twitter Web App', showing almost no source (application) diversity. Twitter Web App is often used for platform manipulation. Again, how something can trend with so many inorganic flags is beyond me. Most of the content is irrelevant
[Thread on Saudi bots] 1/ On 25th February, a day before the release of the CIA report on MBS's ordering of #JamalKhashoggi 's murder, the trend 'the people of the kingdom (Saudi) support the crown prince'. No doubt the purpose was to rally support around MBS before bad publicity
2/ Such trends lionizing the Crown Prince are very common. This one demonstrated some interesting inauthentic activity. The following analysis show how the tweet screenshotted below (which says MBS will overcome his enemies), was retweeted by hundreds of fake accounts
3/ How do we know? A network analysis of the hashtag reveals an unusual cluster of accounts in the bottom left. Here's the edges (relationships between accounts) have been coloured according to device used to send the tweet. The orange shows that activity around this account
In the wake of the CIA release of Khasoggi report dozens of identical tweets per second saying "I am Saudi and proud of this great country and trust and have faith in the wise leadership". So much for Twitter's spam and platform manipulation policy...
The influencers are on board, all repeating the same generic message. Enjoying this healthy debate
For more context on how this is being done - exploiting a marketing function from twitter