A lot of people have been asking me what we know about lipid nanoparticles, mRNA vaccines and the placenta. Can mRNA vaccines cross the placenta? Here’s what we know… 🧵
The main reason that people are suddenly interested in this is because they want to know if mRNA vaccines are safe during pregnancy. So let’s start with the evidence that addresses that directly…. 2/
First, rats given either the Pfizer or Modern mRNA vaccines during pregnancy gave birth to healthy pups. 3/
Second, in the USA more than 44,000 pregnant people have so far received an mRNA vaccine. Passive surveillance of these people has revealed no safety signal, and the same is true for active surveillance of 1,815 pregnant people through V-safe. 4/
So the data we have so far tells us that mRNA vaccines are safe during pregnancy. But you asked if lipid nanoparticles can cross the placenta. Well, can they? 6/
Because we can’t look at the placenta of a person immediately following vaccination (they still need it!) we use evidence from animal models to tackle this question. 7/
The first question to answer is: do mRNAs in lipid nanoparticles even leave the injection site? We know from experiments in mice that they do. This paper used a luciferase mRNA cargo and you can see the livers lighting up 1-4 days post injection. 8/
And here’s a paper from Moderna, looking at an mRNA vaccine against flu. They looked specifically at individual organs, only seeing significant amounts of mRNA at the injection site, draining lymph nodes, spleen and liver. 9/
But what about the placenta? Well, this study aimed to *stop* a harmful drug given to pregnant rats from getting to the fetus. And it worked! So in this study, lipid nanoparticles do not cross the placenta. 10/
And here is a study which used gadolinium as a contrast agent for MRI in pregnant rats. When the gadolinium was contained in lipid nanoparticles, they could image the placenta well, but the agent did not *cross* the placenta. 11/
(These studies, by the way, used much bigger doses of their drugs than anyone will get when they are vaccinated. And remember, the mRNA vaccines aren't that stable either!) 12/
But actually lipid nanoparticles are pretty clever, and although they don’t usually cross the placenta, if we *want to* we can engineer them to get into placental cells. This could be useful if we ever want to target drugs specifically *at* the placenta. 13/
Here’s a nice review on this, for anyone who is interested! 14/
So, lipid nanoparticles *do* leave the site of injection, but they only really appear in the lymph nodes, spleen and liver. 15/
They don't cross the placenta (unless we specifically engineer them to) and we can harness this to give drugs to pregnant animals – and maybe someday people – without them getting into the baby. 16/
And - bonus material for those who are thinking instead about breastfeeding! - they also don't get into breast milk. 17/17
But before we get into the nitty gritty of the #COVID19#vaccine#fertility data, I think it’s useful to first talk a bit about fertility and vaccines in general, and mRNA vaccines in particular... 🧵🤰🏽💉
@strawbale23@CaulfieldTim@harrietsherwood@RCObsGyn The first thing to say is that no vaccine has ever harmed fertility. Many vaccines improve fertility (by preventing infectious diseases that make people less fertile!) but there has never been one that harms it. 2/
Over the last few days more people have asked me if the #COVID19#vaccine reduces fertility. The short answer is still no. The long answer is... also no, but now with EVEN MORE DETAILS. The UK government guidance has also changed since I wrote my last thread. So, an UPDATE... 🧵
I am instinctively uneasy about the proposal to delay/skip the second dose of #COVID19#vaccine. My worry is that the protection will be incomplete and/or wane. Here is some data that speaks to that worry, for the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. 🧵
(With thanks to @StridLab for drawing my attention to it.) 2/
First, I want to note that this data is from BNT162b1. This is the same platform as the vaccine that was approved (BNT162b2) but a shorter mRNA. It was equally immunogenic, but was not taken forward because it was slightly less well tolerated. 3/
People have been asking me if we might expect the #COVID19#vaccine to affect female #fertility. The short answer is no. The long answer is... also no, but with more details... 🧵
There are both theoretical and practical reasons to think the COVID19 vaccine will not impact fertility. I’m going to start with the theoretical ones, since the reasons for thinking it might are *also* theoretical. 2/15
The vaccine works by training the immune system to recognise a protein of the virus called “Spike”. Like all proteins, this is made up of a string of amino acids – like beads on a string. The string then gets folded up into a 3D shape so that the protein can do its work. 3/15
By popular demand (weirdly!) a thread I wrote a while ago is now an opinion piece in @OUPAcademic Oxford Open Immunology. But I’m here to tell you that now I think what I said in the thread was wrong… 🧵
Back in August, I got involved in a conversation with @notimmuneatall about reproductive immunology, which devolved into a critique of Medawar’s 1953 lecture on “the immunological paradox of pregnancy” 2/
A few people got in touch saying they would like to see the thread developed into something more citeable. But I was only just back on my feet after months of homeschooling by day/science by night, so I thought: no way! 3/
#HerdImmunity is a talking point again. So let's talk about it! What conditions do we need to fulfil for a herd immunity strategy to work? And is it possible to do this for #COVID19#SARSCoV2? 🧵
The idea behind herd immunity is simple. We know infectious diseases spread in a population that is susceptible to them. We also know people can become immune. If enough people are immune, the virus doesn't have enough people to spread to. Then small outbreaks will die out. 2/21
Instinctively, we can feel that the more contagious a disease is, the more people need to be immune to prevent it from spreading. 3/21