Next presenter is Dalia El-Shimy, Senior Product Research Lead at @Shopify — So You’ve Earned a Seat at the Table. What’s Next?

#dr2021
At a stakeholder meeting in 2018, a few individual contributors were brought in to share their research with some senior stakeholders.
They started sharing back in granular detail the research with VP's, who didn't connect with that level of granularity.

Dalia saw a huge gap between what the researchers thought the VP cared about and what Dalia felt they cared about.
When we're talking with our team mates we're used to justifying the validity of our findings in granular detail — our teams might care, but our VP's and stakeholders want strong opinions and synthesis on what to do next.

That can make us uncomfortable.
How did we get here?
First we wanted approval
Then we sought stakeholders knowledge
Then we asked for more of their time
Then we asked for inclusion in the forums where our work was being used to make decisions
We have been focussed on so long for getting the 'seat at the table' but we've already been in it.
Having a seat isn't just being part of the right meeting, the moment they see your research, have conversations based on it, that's your seat

We're at risk of losing it if we're not going to use it effectively.
So what do we do now to leverage your seat for it's full potential?

Look for Patterns
Tell the right story
Close the loop
Looking for patterns:

Carry out research on your stakeholders — emails, presentations, check-ins, reports.
How do they communicate?
Positive based — 'upside' of a situation
Fact-based — 'numbers / hard evidence'
Intensity-based — 'if we don't do this the world will end'
What is the language are they using?

Money
People
Funnels

Do you understand the terms, and how comfortable would you be communicating this back to them?
Case Study: Investment Planning at Shopify

When shopify scaled they split the organisation into product lines to get investment from executive.

Research inserted themselves into the structure to get research in the hands of people before they had done investment planning.
Tell the right story

The story stakeholders want to hear is "should we invest in this" and we need to give them memorable shorthand they can reference the more complex narrative.

We take our work from the "What" to the "So what"
Top of this image is the granular research insights the product team were using.

Bottom is the reframing of those insights into more memorable shorthand for the stakeholders.

#dr2021
Closing the loop.

Feedback — If we're going to spend time, energy and resources crafting stories to share with executives we need to know how well they're being perceived.
After they delivered the research Dalia sent the stakeholders a survey asking for specific investment decisions that were made based on the research
Dalia encourages us to take as step back and find out what our stakeholders are trying to decide.

Our role is to expand the boundaries.
Thanks Dalia!

#DR2021
@threadreaderapp unroll please

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rohan Irvine

Rohan Irvine Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RohanIrvine

18 Mar
Next Up!

Katrina Ryl, User Experience Designer at Orica
&
Roland Wimbush, Principal Product Designer at ServiceNSW

— Get your hands dirty: Gaining the trust of hard to reach users

#DR2021
Kat is telling a story about the first time she went to a mining site for research — she managed to get 1 question in before the participant asked "why should I help you IT folk out, you're here to take our job?"
Orica is the number one global supplier of commercial explosives 🧨
Read 17 tweets
18 Mar
Next up is Michael Bloom, Strategy Director at Folk

— What They Say vs What They Do

#dr2021
Michael's going to talk about Journal Studies, how they're under used and hopefully inspire you to use them more!
Michael worked with a peak body to investigate education in science and students performance.
Read 32 tweets
18 Mar
First talk of the day:

Vidhika Bansal, UX Group Manager at Intuit

— Pensieves & Crystal Balls: Mitigating Bias When Investigating Past Behavior and Future Intent

#dr2021
There are a lot of cognitive biases.

Sometimes they help, sometimes they hurt our decision making. Image
Vidhika will be talking about the biases that crop up when we ask people to speak about their past and predict the future.

"What people say, what people do, and what they say are entirely different things"
Read 52 tweets
18 Mar
Final presentation for Day 2 of Design Research 2021

Paul Merrel, Rebecca Hendry, Sean Rom and Peta Marks

— The one-two punch: Context and co-design

#dr2021
Content Warning: Eating Disorders
People with eating disorders often present with at least one addition mental illness. Around 22% access support for their easting disorder and only a small amount receive evidence based care.
Read 29 tweets
18 Mar
Next speaker is Brooke Jamieson, Analytics Lead at PlaceOS

— The Persuasion Equation | how to effectively communicate results to people who don’t want to listen

#dr2021
Brooke's early process.

She was frustrated that putting in so much effort to get great research results but no-one cared about it ImageImage
We need to be talking to people — participants and stakeholders — and talk to the data to find answers.
Read 15 tweets
18 Mar
Next up is Styliana Sarris, Senior User Experience Consultant at Concentrix Tigerspike

— Reporting your User Research Findings like a Psychologist

#DR2021
A deep understanding of the people we're designing for is integral.

But for our stakeholders the research process can be unclear on how we can to our conclusions.
Some of our artefacts are such hi-fidelity that it can give a misconception about the finality of the research.

How do you take stakeholders who don't have direct access to your research along the journey?
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!