It's not just that this is unromantic, it's that it fundamentally misunderstands sexual relationships. Relationships are not transactions in which one person (a man) asks an other party (a woman) for sex, who then, reluctantly, agrees.
Relationships are spaces of mutual desire, lust, communication and ongoing negotiation.
Consent should be thought about in the same way. It is not a transaction. It's a mutual process requiring ongoing communication and sometimes even negotiation.
An app like this cannot capture that. It treat sex like a commodified transaction, one which does not match the realities of how people's actual relationships work. It cannot deal with the complexities of sex.
Worse, it promotes the idea of sex being a commodified transaction.
In that way it could easily be used as a tool for perpetrators. What happens for example when someone who has agreed to do something but then decides they don't want to do it any more. In this case this app could be used against a victim.
Apps like this suggest that consent is a tick box exercise. All you need to do is get someone to sign the dotted line and then everyone's all in. It's not how relationships work.
Finally, one other important point, is that an app like this would either be developed by the Government or a big tech company. I do not trust either to hold onto data about my sex life. No thank you!
This has that big tech energy, which assumes an app can fix everything, written all over it. But an app can't fix sexual assault. That requires changes in our community at a grass roots level. Fuck this idea.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This proposal (and the responses to it) are a perfect example of the serious challenges we face in the regulation/moderation of discourse on the web. Thread. 1/15 #Twitter#Birdwatch#SocialMedia
It is clear that Twitter has, rightfully, concluded that they want to remove themselves somewhat from the process of moderation. They, alongside other companies, have faced significant backlash over their approaches and are searching for ways to outsource the process. 2/15
This controversy is well deserved, and we should be very skeptical of these companies having complete control over these decisions. Twitter's main priority is profit and they make decisions primarily to appease advertisers. 3/15
One thing to note is that this research is about relatively low-profile bans on Reddit. The ban of Donald Trump is much more serious and is leading to literally hundreds of thousands of people moving to platforms like Gab. It moves these platforms away from the fringes.
While not every Trump fan will move to Gab or Parler (if it comes back online), many many will. His reach overall will decrease, but those people who do move will encounter more extreme places.
This video is a good example of a lot of the things I find frustrating about #masculinity discourse, particularly in gay circles. 1/10
Initially it's an interesting discussion. Jacob Michael talks about the issues with masculine norms and I agree that gay men can be good at challenging these. When you break one norm (around sexuality) it can become easier to break them around gender. 2/10
But I find the way he talks about male behaviour frustrating.
He speaks as if men, in particular gay men, can only into masculine things (sports, gyms etc.) because it's the way to show their masculinity. Those things are all just about proving masculinity. 3/10
Some, not entirely complete, thoughts over the suicide of Wilson Gavin after the drag protest earlier this week.
First, as I said yesterday, this whole this is absolutely awful. Their protest was awful, and his suicide is awful too. The whole thing is awful. 1/10
Similar to the thread I retweeted from @maevemarsden, I am extraordinarily uncomfortable with people trying to diagnose why Gavin committed suicide.
We don't know why he did it, and attempts to describe why based off the little information we have is unhelpful. 2/10
I think this is particularly true for those who are assuming that he must somehow have been 'conflicted' about his same-sex attraction and conservative politics.
It is possible that is the case, but it is also entirely possible it wasn't. Again, we just don't know. 3/10
Inside at the Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux event. Will keep all thoughts on this thread.
First thing I noticed was how many people of colour were working on tickets and security for the event. All smiling and doing an amazing job. Rather awkward really.
The venue is packed though. Hundreds of people here. #laurensouthern