If you say stupid shit like this in an investment bank, they take you down to the print room and shoot you. I'd rather read 50 shades of grey than this pseudo-valuation bullshit. Companies are valued on their FUTURE earnings performance - i.e. tomorrow's earnings performance!
Wait, there's companies with zero revenue & high valuations? Yes! Some even have $1bn+ valuations
Most are SPACs BUT there are single companies with $1bn+ valuations with no revenue
Nikola was valued over $30bn at one point & never sold a one truck. Now at $5bn, still not zero!
Assigning a zero value to Kanye's GAP deal assumes the man will not sell a single shirt across the next 10 years
GAP (as a brand) is at least 25% of the business & is showing strong digital growth
Even at modest assumptions - sales are expected well over $100m in the first year
The Kanye/ GAP deal is one of the smartest deals any celebrity has ever made. Why? He gets a chance to cash in on warrants. Basically he can get to own a stake in GAP for cheap (8.5m shares= 2.3%)
Here's an extract from the SEC on how the ratchet (revenue targets) work for Kanye
Quick stock math
- 50% at issuance (GAP closed at $10.16)
- 50% at $25 (fixed)
If Kanye hits $700m net sales, gets full slug of 8.5m stock (GAP spot price - $30.88)
Kanye pays: 4.25m x $25 + 4.25 x $10.16= $149m
Kanye gets: 8.5m x $30.88= $262m
$113m banked, shout-out Axelrod
Let's run this play forward. What if GAP stock gets up to $50 across the next 10 years?
Kanye pays: $149m
Kanye gets: $425m
Banks a juicy $275m
GAP stock is up since 204% since Kanye received warrants
Tom Ford did a similar stock deal with Gucci ended & up as Vice Chairman
Forbes also fucks up the valuation of Yeezy. First rookie error is using 2020 sales, second more criminal mistake is running sales of a ridiculously low valuation multiple AND then applying a further discount.
Stephen Hawking's legs worked better than this valuation
Running numbers on Yeezy royalties
Kanye gets 15c gross on every $1 in sales on Yeezy kicks. After expenses you're looking 10-11c net. UBS estimates at $1.7bn, Kanye takes home $191m
My calcs have Yeezy royalties roughly $5m lower at $185 net, with a slightly higher expense %
Valuing Yeezy (1)
Yeezys grew 31% last year to $1.7bn, even if you low-ball FY21 y-o-y growth at 12% - you're at $1.9bn
Yeezy EBIT margins are c. 12.5%
Apparel EV/EBITDA multiples are 14.7x -15.0x (shout-out to my homeboy @AswathDamodaran) ++ my trusty old comps model confirms
Valuing Yeezy (2)
Let's run a 20% pvt discount on 14.7x, now at 11.8x
Across last 5yrs D&A as % of EBIT is c.29% (Adidas).
$1.9bn at 12.5% EBIT margin = $238m
Scale up D&A over EBIT to get to FY21 EBITDA: $306m
Apply multiple = $3.6bn
At some modest assumptions: Yeezy = $3.7bn
Yeezy Valuation:
Forbes: $1.5bn
UBS: $3.9bn
KK: $3.7bn
On the Yeezy valuation alone, Forbes undercooks Kanye's net worth by at least $1bn - $1.5bn. By zeroing out the GAP deal, they're excluding the upper end of another $900m.
We don't even need to get into music royalties...
Forbes went out & declared Kylie Jenner a billionaire off unaudited, unverified, financial statements. AFTER announcing her as a billionaire, Forbes realized their rookie mistakes & threw her under the bus
....yet here we are, using fucking ridiculous numbers on Kanye?!
Forbes is no stranger to publishing dodgy net worth numbers, running guesstimates & then trying to buy back credibility through long think pieces.
Seems like the media will still tell you something... even after you get your money right
By now you would have seen the media storm over Goldman Sachs analysts working 100+ hours a week.
I've had the fortune (misfortune?) of being both a junior banker and a few years later, team staffer. Here's a bit of insight on why investment banking hours are so long [Thread]
Investment banking is a 6 hour work day stretched across 16 - thanks to long standing inefficiencies, a rigid hierarchy and archaic elements of measuring performance.
Your "game time" when you're running hot and grinding hard is a fraction of the total time you spend on the desk
Across most product areas, you're carved into origination and execution.
Senior bankers are the hunters bringing in deals (originating). Junior bankers are running point on day to day on the deals (executing)
It's two entirely different jobs across the very same client
The Mr Price // YuppieChef deal will make the headlines today... but it triggers much more fascinating story about deal making by SA companies [Thread]
Think of an acquisition as a marriage. A scary number of marriages fail, just like deals. Sometimes the person you date is different to the one you marry (poor due diligence). Both marriages and deals fail when the future isn't what you expected it to be.
Back in 2003, Mr Price tried something different. They dated a South American expansion. They had a couple of test stores in Chile. It failed & they shut it down.
In 2008, Sun International (SUI) tried dating in South America. They started out very slow.. then it went really bad
You're essentially minting a tweet, creating a NFT, transacting on the blockchain & settling payment in ETH
NFT is a non-fungible token
Fancy term for a digital certificate for intellectual property. Think of it like an autograph. Someone pays for your autograph and keeps it as an investment.
Your autograph (NFT) here is a digital certificate of your tweet.
Instead of borrowing money from a bank, a company (or government) will borrow from investors. So investors will give the company money & in exchange they get paid interest (called coupons)
Fancy term for the IOU is "bond issuance"
I'm an investor, how do the mechanics work?
Company sells you a bond for $100 and promises you 5% every year for 3 years. They also pay you $100 at the end.
Yr 1: $5
Yr 2: $5
Yr 3: $5 + $100
That's $115 (or a 15% return) after 3 years. Right?
Quarterly earnings reports are a catalyst in rewarding short term-ism, introducing volatility, soaking up management time & distorting strategic focus.
Against the lifespan of a company, 3 months is inconsequential, yetyou're expected to deliver a certain outcome.
You're facing return hungry shareholders & Wall Street analysts with massive expectations.
It's the equivalent of stepping on a scale every single day on a diet.
The worst part of short term-ism are the incentives that accompany it.
Many exec compensation schemes are tied to targets short term in nature.
Rewarded for a higher EPS?
Ah, let's go out & trigger a buyback
Rewarded for scale?
Ah, less do some value dilutive M&A